Personally, the way I “resist” the system (or STS) is by living my life in a way that demonstrates alternatives to how the system raised us. This then can hopefully inspire others to emulate some of it. And when enough people have become more loving, then STS (or the system) loses its hold. Simply because those subtle negative teachings can no longer successfully influence us.
As you pointed out, if instead we “fight” them, we play into their hands and help maintain the age old status-quo.
That is because there is no “them” and so there is no “them” versus “us”.
The Confederation has many times explicitly told us how to “win” this perceived conflict which is actually taking place inside of us.
That’s why this threads is named “Some clear words”.
It’s easy to teach something when you have not to suffer under the situation or to be involved in violations of you free will.
Please forgive for pointing out that there is the impression, that the Q’uo are not helpful any more in the concrete situation of the humans now. This does not include Quo’s endless expositions about love and the one creator, which are certainly still spiritually helpful to many individuals.
Reading the following from this channeling leads to laughing out loud:
I am Q’uo, and I’m aware of the query my brother. And we thank you for this elaborate and rich query, for we feel that it touches upon a very central aspect of your journey as spiritual seekers. And [it] particularly touches upon an aspect of the culture of the, what has been called, “new-age community” of which circles like this are a part.
This clearly shows how the questions are classified and treated by the Q’uo.
There can be no clear words expected any more - it’s only like answering questions to a little child.
Your question is already nudging and therefore not correct.
To be peaceful has nothing to do with helping STS.
But endorsing a system that is not faithfully and supporting STS is not acting STO.
That’s the slight and hidden difference.
It’s possible to say it is active ignorance or (unconscious) looking away, or judging in different ways that has been implemented into the thinking.
We are confronted with really clever mechanisms like nudging and gaslighting everywhere that keeps everyone trapped into a programmed way of thinking.
Maybe it is a good way to reflect about the word and relation of Wetiko or the Mátchi-Syndrom to all of us.
That’s the really dangerous part of it, that there are not clear borders.
It is a creeping process, mostly induced and enforced of the behavior of the society.
At least I would say that the definition of STS and STO from Ra is a misleading and bad one.
It is good for the nexus that has been explained in the Ra channelings, but it does not really cover all aspects we are confronted.
The system is designed in such a way that passivity is interpreted as consent.
So you are forced to say active NO, when it is your own free will to be passive.
Yes - that’s needed, but positive energy is interpreted as resistance, at least when you must say NO.
This is a really important point!
Everyone who says NO will be provoked, for example with being barred from nearly everything or with unfair treatement. This includes being pilloried and put under massive psychological pressure.
Saying “NO” is already “fighting” in the eyes of the Elite / government.
This even goes far beyond that, if you take a closer look at the philosophy and way of thinking of the Illuminati.
So the term “Illuminati” is not about any membership or about a certain grouping, but about a mentality: the self-important opinion that one is “better than the others”, which is why “our” end " sanctifies" the means.
This includes war, torture, genetic and mental manipulation, and any other means.
If needed some more explanatory quotes can be given.
Then you are really already part of them and this illuminati philosophy?
You know why this question is so provocative.
The confederation and the Q’uo are not a substitute religion.
And I am sure that they don’t want to be one.
In one of my favourite zen stories a university scholar, curious about Zen, comes to visit Master Nan-in. They sit down for tea. The monk quietly pours his visitor’s cup full, then keeps on pouring.
The scholar watches the cup overflow until he can no longer restrain himself. “It is overfull!” he shouts. “No more will go in!”
“Like this cup,” Nan-in says, “you are full of your own opinions and speculations. How can I show you Zen unless you first empty your cup?”
Everything changes in progression of time, as time serves as a mean to mark the changes.
Universal wide; the degree of oppression, exploitation, violence, mistreatment also change in progression of time but always in balanced with each respective opposite. The “Is Not” exist and so does the “Is” as it’s opposing pair. When the “Is Not” no longer exist then so does the “Is”.
I partially agree. I believe Ra’s definition, while simplistic, isn’t necessarily wrong or misleading. I have often related Ra’s definition to mundane issues and everyday situations.
Ra is clear and specific enough to be considered as an element to better understand STO/STS, they just never exhausted it and one still has to educate oneself by comparing different kinds of sources and think for oneself.
Let’s lighten this up.
This is what I’m referring to when I speak about passive resistance, let’s take an example: They want to vaccinate me. In line with my own free will, I wholeheartedly reject their proposed vaccination and ignore their calls for vaccination.
In my mind, I asked the Creator to eradicate all vaccination-“promoting” activities from the Earth, envisioning a return to normalcy, to a situation resembling the one prior to this “promotion.” Besides the requests, I also expressed resentment and responded with indignation to the thought of being forcibly vaccinated.
On the other hand, let’s consider what I did not do: I did not engage with the opposing argument with people without being open about it. I did not encourage others to either accept or reject vaccines, acknowledging that it was ultimately their own decision. I did not verbally or physically attack anyone who could potentially cause me harm or restrict me in any way.
In general, I came out of the whole situation unscathed, and nothing happened that was something violent against me. So I think I made the right decisions.
Now, the question we must grapple with is understanding the nature of appropriate resistance for us. Do you perceive actions like the ones above as STO or STS? Or perhaps partially STS and partially STO? Was my behavior at all suitable, and did I manage to resist STS effectively in this manner?
Love & Light my brother - and thank you for the quotes of the Q’uo i have missed from you.
Keep your positive way but please be more careful with your believes and who you give your energy.
Of course everyone must find a way for his life in this incarnation and in the final game of this Kali-Yuga.
The same can be reported, without never made a test and infections could be overcome for my own in a short time.
The good thing is that “No” is a complete sentence.
It is clear and needs no explanation - even when it is enforced.
You can maybe add “No - this is the own will of a living being” to clarify.
You mean the actions of manipulation and pressure on people?
Every violation of the own free will is STS.
It is a naturally law to have (always) the right to defend.
Otherwise it is the acceptance of a foreign will - here closes the circle to STS.
