I agree with what Patrick is saying if I could expand on his words…
The Ra Material is very much based on polarity and free will. When I began this journey, I was very taken by these two subjects and then mortified of breaking the law of free will and had no clue how to bring polarity into balance.
Polarity, let us say the positive path is a choice that has been made over many lifetimes and has become what Ra states; “a spiritual bias”. If you are thinking about your positive path you no doubt have chosen a pole. It is within your field of consciousness.
Balancing comes really from choosing or making choices; living by experience, life experience. As like Patrick said…to do a good thing for another is awesome but to sacrifice all is not very balanced as you may end up hurting yourself. What would be better is to help yourself, help another but not hurting anyone in the process including yourself.
Help yourself first through study first, prayer, deep contemplation and meditation (that is not harmful); then try what you have learned. Really it is best to teach a man to fish rather than to empty our entire fish basket to him.
Balancing is not useless because it is a self conscious act. You are consciously aware of what you are choosing. To bring things into better balance is to reflect upon your choice at the end of the day before going to sleep. Play your day in reverse. Think about the thing you did last and go through the day until you reach the beginning of your day. This reflection should aid you in knowing when if your choices were balaced or not. I mean, this is simply put.
Actually, knowing what you are doing and are capable of doing is critical. It is self consciousness.
Free will is just honoring another’s freedom to choose his own way no matter how you may feel or think about it.
The spiritually immature brothers and sisters who choose the darkness do the opposite. The more advanced dark brothers and sisters are few but they try to control larger groups of people because they think they have a right and that we must be kept in line or in our place to create order fashioned by them. They use various means to control including black magic done on a large scale using various techniques. These, like I said are few in comparison to the people who desire goodness. So no real worries there. They should never be a focus as they do what they will do. Your focus is your own healing and balance in order to serve others better and more appropriately.
Totally Dieu9, totally. 
I have come to believe the answer to this question is fundamentally inaccessible to most of us. We can only see it from our own perspective, not have any idea what it actually is because only God does.
It reminds me of that poem “Tyger, Tyger”.
What I have observed as to how I see sixth density entities on earth handle this subject, is that they really do have a very strong moral framework. They speak for hours on ethics in general. They teach a message that pressures and looks into the service to self as much as it is possible for them. Not in relation to global machiavellian weirdness. But in relation to peoples personal experiences.
It is not that the sixth is above morals. It is that the sixth is integrating the confusions of potential negative polarisation into their world view - which is moral. It is filtering the negative behaviours through the filter of morals and explaining why it is wrong. Really understanding and having sympathy for people that are walking that path sometimes. And recognising at others they can’t be negotiated with and are dangerous.
As someone that is fifth density. I have not got there yet. So for me, the service to self and how their psychology works is largely a mystery - and there are a lot of things I have determined it is not useful for me to care about in that area. Where my attention should be more solidly on my own stuff. This goes back to the whole ‘transcient’ thing potentially.
Where I do pay attention though, is when a sixth density entity explains stuff in this area. It is also relevant to absorb that for the practical reason of being aware that the negative might trip us up in our everyday lives.
I feel it is no mystery. The truly negative are not going to use and will refuse to connect to the heart or their 4th chakra and when they do it is but for a brief moment. They don’t want it. We do and that is why we are working toward our goals of wanting to be closer to God or whatever your word is for It. I say God because it is easier to type than The One Infinite Creator plus I am comfortable with that term.
We want it (love and goodness)…they don’t.
I feel Ra and all the others are beyond the framework of morals. I think they may see it as there is this and then there is that…but no matter what you choose you need to balance the light and shadow within. If I remember correctly, Ra doesn’t use any term like moral or immoral but rather they use terms like the light and the dark. And the dark is a viable path whether we attach a term to it or not. It just is a spiritual power as long as the ones who enjoy it are consciously aware of their choice and work toward a single goal if you will. Just like us.
Well, I agree with that too, although some deeper aspects may always remain a mystery. Nevertheless, we still know a great deal.
Also, here I’m addressing @Phoenix specifically—there is no such thing as a distinct ‘service-to-self psychology.’ It is the same psychology as ours. For me, many thoughts and choices revolve around an internal ‘competition’ between STS and STO, as everything can pass through me.
Now, regarding the broader perspective—the worst way to approach understanding STS and STO is to equate them with the concepts of good and evil or right and wrong or morality and immorality. These are highly subjective notions. A more accurate distinction would be ‘in alignment with the Heart Chakra’ vs. ‘not in alignment with the Heart Chakra,’ or viewing it as light vs. darkness, or in a more ‘technical’ sense, positivity (radiant) vs. negativity (absorbent).
Yes, but in practical terms. The statement, in the real world of “refuse to connect to their 4th chakra” doesn’t explain much. It is coherent and makes sense as a philosophy, and it means something to us here. But in the real world it doesn’t mean anything.
I can’t look at someone in my life and say they are 68% activated in the heart chakra. In real terms a lot of moral issues are clouded. Of course, I believe a lot of these can be explained adequately. But it is easier to be fooled.
For instance, think about Christianity. Is receiving money from the government and giving it to “refugees” a legitimately positive thing to do? There are a lot of points on both sides and this is a grand societal thing relatively easy to understand. In comparison to subtle emotional issues in our real lives.
No, not at all. I do not agree. In order for us to ascertain what is good or bad in our lives, and what we instinctively know to be true. These notions are important. To use a gruesome example. Say some sort of luciferian child trafficking ring was busted and there were loads of mutilated children in a hospital. And someone took you to one of them and you saw the damage done. You would know within yourself this is evil. There would be none of this postmodern relativism of values.
I heard recently a description of dysfunctional psychology. Not service to self per sey, but a description of how people slide along that path. This is not my definition and idea. The person said that in people like that, they suppress their conscience, and then their relationship to their conscience and suppression of it demands the most important place in their psychology.
So if you walk up to them and want to discuss whatever it is they did wrong. They will break their connection with you. Even if it is their own child. Because their need to suppress their conscience takes priority. Perhaps for some people, because if they were to actually face it they would kill themselves. So it is a survival requirement.
This is a distinctly different psychology to people on the service to others path.
Well, from their point of view, it may seem beneficial for those children. For example, according to these traffickers, those children would have amounted to nothing anyway because, in their view, they had nothing of value within themselves. This way, they could become support for something higher than themselves, which the traffickers believed they represented. They might have hundreds of arguments to justify their actions, believing they have done nothing wrong.
On the other hand, if they acknowledged the distinction between positivity and negativity—particularly the importance of respecting free will—they would clearly recognize their actions as negative. At that point, they could choose whether to continue consciously violating free will in the hope of achieving a correspondingly high level of negative polarity, even at the cost of the karma resulting from such violations, or to abandon these actions and begin developing in a positive direction. Changing their lives completely for STO.
However, I assume they don’t see it this way, whereas for us, this perspective may seem natural and rational based on what we learn here.
By the way, for me, child trafficking is also clearly an evil act. However, I understand that this is my subjective perspective on good and evil, and that the STO vs. STS dichotomy is ultimately more significant. Of course, in this particular case, what is evil is also STS at the same time.
Okay, in a sense, you are right. At the level at which you consider it, it actually makes sense, and there is a lot of truth in that. However, it would be worthwhile to refer to what Q’uo, at the very least, teaches—that we are 360-degree beings.
One should be aware that our subconscious contains various positive and negative aspects of ourselves, which prevail at different times. Ultimately, though, it is up to us to integrate both. Somewhere within us, we are rapists and predators; somewhere within us, we are saints and angels. In the end, we must integrate these aspects, as this inner unification allows us to develop a constant and stable gravitational center—one in which the fully known and recognized negativity within us, when drawn inward, is balanced by radiating outward as love, warmth, smiles, and joy.
The more stable and fully integrated our negative core, the broader and more complete our expression of positivity and radiance. This is unity.
I so agree K, I see us as being all of it and then this being a matter of choice. So agree.
I think, that if you actually did go to said hospital you wouldn’t recover. The reason that it is relevant to me I believe. What I am trying to say. Is that spirit, the higher self, has a language. It is a feeling based language but not really feeling. This language recognises good and evil as genuine characteristics. If you were taken to said hospital your spirit would scream “this is evil”. Then you would not be able to uncouple from that. Because the situation has allowed spirits voice to speak loud enough.
Sounds like a fairly female centric spiritual understanding to me. I have noticed with women that they have this view of themselves as saints and it can block everything in their lives. When an actual understanding of their lives is that there were negative motivations in parts of it.
Then women will in the next breath tell you about something really, deeply unpleasant and unethical she has done. Unaware that this reflects on her character. They are so good at rationalising.
For me, and I think many guys. This was never in doubt. I have never had rape fantasies. It’s just not the way I lean (but there’s nothing wrong with it as you said, also, a lot of women have rape fantasies as well). But people have been tied up and had various parts of themselves cut off in my mind for “walking too slow”. It’s not such a big deal for men that there are parts of the self that are less than perfect in that non violent sense. Men are hunters.
I saw people suffering, yet nothing inside me screamed. The question is: is what happens to them good or bad? On one hand, it seems bad, but on the other, I don’t know—because ultimately, it is good, as it allows them to learn. It is simply someone experiencing the harm they once inflicted on another—the balancing of karmic energies. So, is this good or bad?
We have free will, and at some level, these individuals must have granted permission for such experiences—this incarnation and its lessons. Since this process arises from cooperation with their own Higher Self, it is ultimately good, not bad.
On the other hand, what is certain for me is that this is not a matter of good or bad, but rather a matter of observing negativity and distortion. And still, nothing in me screams. I simply recognize the special need to support those who have been harmed—if they ask for help.
Forgive me, but you misunderstood me. I wasn’t referring to being disconnected from self or deceiving self. On the contrary, my perspective is about getting to know and integrating different aspects of oneself. I am speaking of unity, not separation or self-deception.
As for women, I see things a little differently. To me, every woman has both a devil and an angel within her—just as I described the concept of a 360-degree being. In a very overall sense, when it comes to self-honesty and spiritual self-awareness, they are no different from men.
However, it is often observed that women are more in touch with their instincts than men. They tend to be better at reading emotions and body language, as well as controlling their own body language. They can also simulate various emotions and conceal their true feelings when they wish to influence or manipulate those around them easier than men. On the other hand, when they work on themselves in a positive way, these same abilities allow them to better understand the needs of others, show deeper care in a practical way, and express their own positive emotions on a more integrated emotional-physical level, what men can’t.
Men are hunters. Well, was Jesus a hunter? Perhaps—if he had been the only one who could provide food, he likely would have hunted to survive. But his role was different. He primarily shared himself—his positivity—through care, love, and even a simple smile. He transformed those around him; he was the embodiment of positivity. He had a particular concern for those in difficult situations, whose lives were dominated by bitterness and sadness.
Was this a feminine trait? In a sense, all service to others can be seen as ‘feminine,’ while service to self is often considered ‘masculine.’ However, both men and women find fulfillment in service to others or service to self, depending on choice.
Jesus used his masculine qualities to walk great distances and travel extensively—something that would have been much harder for women at the time. He also relied on masculine resilience and risk-taking to interact with difficult individuals and confront negativity with positivity. An activity not for girls.
Ultimately, I believe that on a broader and higher level—within his Higher Self—he was destined to make a grave mistake in his past, where he harmed and killed another boy. This karmic debt eventually led to his crucifixion, providing him with an intense catalyst for growth—one that he fully embraced. As a woman, he would have had different tendencies towards aggressio, and then he would not have attacked physically and ended up on the cross ultimately.
The path of service to others will be different for women. We know of various female saints, mystics, and intellectuals too.
Ultimately, my will is to emphasize that due to our rich spiritual depth we can, externally we can manifest and narrowly define ourselves in different ways. Deep within ourselves we are Creators, we have the potential to be everything, and in order to return to being Creators as a conscious state of being. We must fully unite ourselves internally, and this means integrating and transcending all dualisms within ourselves (femininity-masculinity, positivity-negativity, etc.).
I just had the most bizarre synchronicity while reading your post there. I wouldn’t normally confide this sort of thing because I hope to err on the side of caution with free will matters. But it was so precisely timed to me booting my laptop to respond here that it seems it might have been meant to share.
A light I have just switched itself on while I was reading your post. Then off once I had finished. This light very rarely does do strange things like switch on or off, one time. Never on then off. Never timed like this.
I have been getting a lot of synchronicities lately, perhaps linked a little to studying archetypes. A lot more than usual.
Has left my thought process here a little less organised than usual. A few of my thoughts have taken flight.
I would say with the first of your three points that no, I don’t agree. When it comes to that kind of evil that goes beyond normal experience to something out of a hell raiser film. That is not the same thing as many positive peoples experience with SOME duress, probably in their formative years.
In my understanding, my thoughts on this. Is that we are in either a positively or negatively polarised space and if people for whatever reason are thrown to the negative space, then things happen in accord with the fashionings of the negative polarity. This would explain “hell” NDE’s. It could be that some people go back to hell between lives and have no life review or anything like that. They just get tortured. If negative time/space exists on earth, which the Law of One stated it did, then this seems perfectly logical to me.
I see this as a possible reason for the experience of pure malevolence I described. But I am unwilling to say that the babies/ children involved were negatively polarised before this life and this justifies this. I don’t know, there could be other factors at play. The negative polarity simply takes what it wants without reference to peoples preincarnative “life paths”.
To me then, a positively polarised entity (A “limited” positively polarised entity. A human). That level of negativity has no place and needs to be flatly stamped out. There is no deeper meaning to the tortures of the negative path they are just all mad. It serves no utility to consider some grand plan meaning for it all.
I will leave it there for the moment. I basically agree with your other two points. The second more or less without modification.
Back from a walk. Shaken off that “spiritual feeling”… Yuk! (Jk).
Some of my “path” recently has involved looking at and thinking about Jesus, something I have not mentioned here. For instance, I have continued to find I am not an energy healer. But my fascination with that kind of thing can be satisfied by re reading the gospels. I still think those stories are pretty amazing. However, my subjective experience of a lot of spiritual things are at odds with a more rational and skeptical part of my mind that subjects everything to a lot of tests.
While philosophically. The tendencies of evolutionary psychology and such, make a lot of sense. Also, I tend to think atheism is the best way to go for most areas because of a lot of different reasons. There is still this spiritual element that can’t really be negotiated away. That “shakes my life” semi frequently.
I would say Jesus is an incredible outlier. So a lot of people will be dealing with a lot of grounded things that he did not discuss. I would say that in my personal life so far I have observed it far more common in women to attempt to justify away all their bad qualities. And for men to not have that same tendency. But to even want to promote the degraded and violent sides of themselves.
So from that perspective it does seem likely that is more of a female teaching. All this shadow self stuff.
In reference to what the male and spiritual paths turn out to be as our society “matures”. I think the male is pretty worked out from what I understand. It is a kind of heroism. A kind of entrepeneurship. It definitely has as a fundamental part of itself a commitment to fight what is considered evil and evildoers. It often wants to take care of women and children and most especially by having a wife. It often has a lot of powerful wisdom or skills to show the world and make it a better place.
What is the feminine spiritual path? I don’t know. I don’t need to know I don’t think unless there is some utility in me knowing. Female fantasies often have the main character as the most normal kind of woman that ever existed. Who is suddenly obsessed over by a guy several times higher than her status.
I also don’t have a famous female figure I can point to. Up until like, a few days ago Carla was that. But since I read the Quo reading where she promoted abortion that has swiftly ended.
So there is yet more for me to understand in this life.
I wonder something. There are here many observations of behaviors of both masculine and feminine traits, but do you not feel that many of these are based on generalizations and perhaps some of our fixed views of what men and women are based on specific memories of what we have seen ?
How much of these generalizations are actually created by us on just very few examples ?
I think that men and women are much more varied in their deep /makeup’.
Women who become sole provider for their child when their partner leaves, show great amount of stoicism and heroism.
Men who are, for example, thrown into war show often great compassion and care to the enemy soldiers who become their prisoners.
Those are only just a few exemples of crossing over virtues who are assigned to one gender in particular.
I think generalization of what traits belong to one gender or another ends often by being a limitation.
Hello, here, probably, a being of sixth (I’m not sure because it would be a violation of the law of confusion), sincerely, I think the same, evil must be eradicated, this philosophy of the law of one, allowing negative polarity, allows and encourages chaos, with the “privilege of incarnation”, while the positives are born in poor families to give love and light, that is, an asymmetry that favors chaos, since the abuse and suffering of the innocent has a value above the entities, like any control mechanism or policy that justifies their acts above people, I have had dreams of Orion and other contacts of negative polarity, and they have shown me some catastrophes on their planets, it could be a lie, but the fact that it makes sense and everything fits with what RA says, is what is most scary, because I have even dreamed that Nietzsche told me that angels are “celestial abusers”, which At that time, when I was a child, it left me perplexed, and I have also had dreams where they tell me that evil is democratized and systematized, and lo and behold, it turns out that there is a god who controls the incarnation and allows evil.
That was probably a manipulation by Orion, but who knows?
Well, I didn’t pick up on it before but KK said that in general, the masculine correlates to STS and the feminine correlates to STO.
Not really how I see it. I see masculine as an incredible light. If you think about systems such as the I ching. The masculine is yang lines. Three yang lines is heaven. The feminine are yin lines. Three yin lines are earth.
A group of men to me are laughing and doing something fun and unique. Such as the guys that made a giant paper aeroplane. When I have dealt with women in general. I have often had the sense of unfathomable darkness since they hide absolutely everything. There is no “warmth” there only tends to be gossip and such. An ocean of feelings perhaps, but these feelings are not enthusiastic and outgoing.
The idea that women are the positive ones and men are STS is something that seems to me to be societally based. It’s consumerism. In general, women are the ones that spend a lot of money. (80% of consumer debt etc.) So if you want to promote that culture you push this “Sex and the City”, Lipstick heavy, strange debased culture. Then the companies rake it in.
Three women I can think of as interesting. One was Florence Nightingale. She literally felt like she heard a call from God to do the medical stuff she did. Another is Pearl Davis. But Pearl is so heavy on the courage and such that she just doesn’t seem to be travelling a typically feminine path. Also, I suppose Ayn Rand was super smart.
Well, I don’t know. But it sounds to me reminiscent of William Blakes output. He talked a lot about the negative polarity but from a poetic perspective. It’s nice reading through some of what he wrote about it. “The negative sees others in chains but does not realise that it is in fact the one in chains”.
I do have a book called “Dear Angel” which has ‘angel prayers’ in it. The authors/ company name is ‘human angels’ and it has two prayers to say before bed - one of which is specifically to avoid negative stuff visiting us at night. The Law of one stated specifically that people can pray and increase their positive polarisation with no conscious effort during sleep!
On Densities. Maybe I should write a few blog posts on this. How I feel that I determined my density and such. Someone else asked me on here recently about this. But I don’t want to go into a whole explanation everytime someone asks. So a blog might be better. I do feel the information is very useful and relevant.
Regarding your illustration of the masculine spiritual path, I fully agree. The archetypes that shine forth the strongest in the masculine path of spiritual development would be something like the King, the Warrior, the Magician, and the Lover. The energies you alluded to off creating, sustaining, inspiring, and protecting can be mapped on pretty well to these images.
As far as the feminine path pertains in its relationship to Intelligent Infinity and the One Infinite Creator, I hypothesize its archetypal patterns would be something like Queen, Huntress, High Priestess, Muse/Lover, in retaining symmetry to the masculine archetypes.
These archetypes, both masculine and feminine, could also have their shadows found in the negative path, being the Tyrant, Warlord, Witch, Temptress, etc, etc.
Archetypally, I have understandings. Such as this. The lower level is fully female. The upper level is fully male. The right side is the spiritual female. The left is the spiritual male. There is a mix of genders in the “spiritual” expression of these types.
So for the female we start at Maia, makes more sense if that is called Gaia to me. Then move through Lakshmi and Parvati, then to Ma’at. You also have Harmony and Minerva (Minerva is an Athena type thing, strategy). Also Kali is female (spirit and wrath!)
But like I say, there aren’t many examples out in the real world of these things. The way women in the new age talk about love and such, makes me think that they would benefit from more of a mainstream new age “religion” as such that included the Christian community but was not as confused as Christianity. But this is something that doesn’t exist in the world.
I read a fiction book that I thought was on point on a lot of metaphysical concepts. The Warded Man by Peter V Brett. Had demons that correlated with LoO understandings in some ways. Delineation between 4D neg and 5D neg. Auras, Magick etc. The fictional world was a matriarchy where women judged each other quite harshly based on female standards. Like “birthing hips” and such. In that fictional world obviously, with magick being real healers had more power and a lot of the healers were female.
But it’s really them that should be doing the work of determining and promoting that stuff not me. If there are so few examples of female heroism and coherent archetypes, that is not my issue really.
Honestly, I don’t like to pray, since they are requests, it’s quite funny that those from ORION said, “confess your sins to God”; the result, negative requests, probably, at least when I was younger it happened to me, long story, in itself praying is like throwing a coin into a well where we don’t know if it’s going to be a positive or negative entity, too dangerous, besides that I don’t like to bend down before anything, but surely that’s not the only way to pray and it’s somewhat reminiscent of ORION.
What you share is very interesting, “the negative sees others chained”, it’s really very useful to me.
Wow…unreal