Well Jesus was not Christian, whileo I believe that he contributed to the formation of Christianity, in ways that we are not even fully aware of. However those mainstream Christianity made him the Son of God, which is just a myth and a sectarian ploy, in my opinion. Undoubtedly, it could have happened that the myth of Jesus Christ is based on the real figure of Jesus.
As for the source of the teachings, various sources can be distinguished in my opinion, as it comes to the Jesus: 1) the real Jesus, 2) the mythical Jesus, and as it comes to the Christianity: 3) mainstream Christianity, 4) the real deeper Christianity as a set of essential philosophical, spiritual and psychological teachings live in what I can express as a collective consciousness of the involved part of humanity. All this can be considered as a completely different source and at the same time intersect somewhere.
If you have time then I invite you to read, maybe I will suggest something to all of you. I would like to bring up a few things that are not normally brought up…
From my thinking the long post came out, very long. I doubted whether to give it in this form. However, on the other hand, I thought that if someone will not be interested in it, they do not have to read it and can scroll through the post or possibly find something that interests them in it. Inserting a long post, does not mean you have to read it.
Let me start with the basics from my point of view. For me, Jesus has a primarily spiritual dimension. At my call, praying to Jesus and contemplating Jesus, I have repeatedly opened to positive energies and noticed changes in my thinking and behavior for closer to the positive. Unfortunately, I have no basis for claiming that it was that real Jesus with whom I had contact.
I believe that focusing on Jesus in my life has many times fulfilled the role of a gateway to connect with the higher densities of Service to Others, with the 4th and 5th density especially, I think. When I asked for love and wisdom and defense against the evil spirit and various demonic beings, which I identify mainly with 4D STS, then 4D STO balanced and supported me, through asking Jesus for help.
Note that the higher densities are selectively received and perceived by our consciousness and will match our expectations and free will. If one connects with the higher densities of STO, and call Jesus in one’s personal experience Jesus can come to him, even if it is not Jesus. Which doesn’t mean it won’t be a positive entity. Someone will see Jesus due to the fact that it will be so chosen by him, and this being representing Jesus will not forcefully in any way precipitate it so as not to violate the free will, becuase for such entity it is more important to convey love and knowledge and even they don’t really look physical as we are used to in 3D…
In general, belief in Jesus and the idea of love and live spirituality behind him is considered by me as very important, because it is an expression of the will of the individual, who through the faith in this can open himself to contact with the worlds of higher densities of positive polarity. Expressing his will clearly in his faith.
As for the question of Jesus as a historical figure not as only spiritual, by all means, I am inclined to believe that there was someone who developed himself on the spiritual path who the name was Jesus or Yeshua or Yehoshua. As someone who was a seeker and was engaged in metaphysical work, developing and sharing love and knowledge with others, even exploration of areas far beyond Palestine. Adding to the general body of spiritual knowledge and including the development of deeper Christianity (understood by me, as the collective development of consciousness based on a broad cultural and religious perspective, as I briefly described in a previous post: Message From Jesus - #29 by K.K.33). However, this Jesus was in no way a superhuman or exceptional figure. He was like anyone else, learning from others and teaching others. He was a link, out of tens of thousands of other links, seeking and developing spiritually.
On the other hand, there is another version of Jesus. Mainstream Jesus Christ. Here I mean this most popular version of Jesus. The famous carpenter who became the messiah. Personally, I may surprise you with this, but I simply see it as the work of the secret services of the ancient world. At its very foundation, it looks like psy-op and cult formation.
In the creation of various types of sects, such a message is created, where the leader of the group is shown to come from a lower social stratum or to have an ordinary, simple background, even if he/she is a substituted agent. It could be a carpenter, it could be an ordinary housewife, whatever…
Then, when these impressions of familiarity and hailing from the “one nest” are inculcated, the illusion of uniqueness and anomalousness of leader is created, some extraordinary ability to assimilate knowledge and understand reality or connection to God or some spiritual higher source is linked to the sect leader, or just the ability to perform miracles like in the story about Jesus…
Such records of miracles are no accident. If something is already appearing in important writings, it is intended to evoke a corresponding purpose. And so in this, too, I see the actions of, for example, some Greco-Roman security forces who edited early writings adding stories of miracles to give incredulity to Jesus, to possible further form a cult on such grounds.
One more characteristic feature is the status of Jesus Christ as the Son of God. This is also very sectarian and helps to legitimize the superiority of an individual over other individuals, and those who are close to the supposed Son of God or are his direct messengers automatically gain a higher status. All this in the future brought the creation of an ecclesiastical hierarchy that is pure STS…
So to summarize what mainstream Christianity is in my opinion. It is a sect and cult that was created to fuse all those wonderful (really wondrful) ideas like the Egyptian belief in one God or the Greek pursuit of trandescendal love, which I personally recognize as half of the Christianity, this positive half off distortion-free form of Christianity, and get it under control with a single powerful authority, what is the negative part of the story of the mainstream Christianity.
Also in this we find references to Mithraism, the practice of bathing in the blood of a bull was only for the chosen ones for initiation, and in Christianity what do we have? We have Baptism for all (not just the elect) and not in the blood of a bull, but in the water, and this already makes the religion more accessible to the masses, new religion makes the range. So for it various associations with other spiritual heritages were being prepared.
According to my theory, all these references to various religions were meant to attract people throughout the Roman Empire and adjoining states, giving all people something to be interested in and to use for spiritual development and for objective spiritual development - this is the positive part of Christianity.
The negative one is that all of this, according to my theory, played out as a psychological operation by the secret services like some deep state of the Roman Empire, through the establishment of a sect, a cult of the entity Jesus as the Messiah for the creation of a mass religion under one supervision in the future. When small cult groups began to grow… to make it all look like a grassroots movement, then the moment they became larger and could not be ignored. Subsequent changes could have been made.
It’s all a bigger plan and STS has to take its toll. Mainstream Christianity has elements of this valuable teachings, which are links to various other teachings derived from various earlier philosophies, beliefs and rituals of a positive nature. With the ultimate goal of bringing it under control, by the combined political, military and religious power structures. Important role in this play the Son of God illusion, one man, which narrows down the entire spiritual world suggesting that only through him can you get to heaven. And when you leave his flock you will be, perhaps even condemned. Since there is only one way to God, those closest to the top of this pyramid on which is the Son of God constitute their prestige and consolidate their power.
…At my room on the wall I have a picture of Jesus the Merciful. I watch it a dozen times a day, maybe even more. An important element of my room, this image is symbolic of the idea of unconditional love. And it is as OK for me. However, when it comes to mainstream Jesus Christ, who was Son of God died on the cross and rose again… well, for me it is purely a story told for the sake of distraction. No one like that has ever existed in my opinion, as Jesus Christ, in the way he is generally presented to us. Jesus as a symbol and gateway to the Density of Love, that is ok. Jesus or Yeshua, who was a seeker and someone involved in metaphysical work, who worked on his polarity and studied, perhaps influencing his immediate circle that’s ok. However, I reject the mainstream version of Jesus and others close to it.
Story about Jesus Christ, a humble carpenter, a young handsome man cuddling sweet lambs, whose teachings remarkably embraced a good portion of the globe, the 2 billion people in the domination-oriented STS reality, and if someone see no trap in it, then someone like this has to be really naive. And he himself (Jesus Christ) at the same time was not intelligent enough to leave behind some of his own writings. And all “his” teachings, they are in fact someone else’s work. To me, this is not very realistic. For me, this official version of Jesus is simply mystification.
It is still a matter of years away. How would it look that from the year, let’s say 0, to the adoption of Christianity by Rome in 380, so many years passed and that Christians were persecuted by the Roman Emperors. I believe that the old order simply did not want to accept the new religion that was in the mind of the underground organizations (or the deep state of the Roman Empire), who were interested in uniting the entire Roman Empire and the surrounding area, under one religion and go on to launch further invasions spreading civilization and removing pagan beliefs. The Roman emperors and the arrangements there did not want change, including many of Roman citizens. They wanted to preserve the status quo.
As for the year around 0 as the birth and later activities of Jesus. Well, I would dismiss that as the beginning of Christianity in general. In my opinion, the beginning was an already crafted sectarian version of beliefs in the messiah and his teachings of this sect took the expression of indoctrination. This involved adopting an irrational belief in Jesus Christ, the messiah who died on the cross. Even if it so happened that it was this positive soul of Jesus/Yeshua and his body that was crucified, I see the whole story around this heavily stretched and crafted for a new cult. Of course, some of these teachings were, as I wrote earlier, positive and collected many important things from other philosophies and religions. Which, however, did not eliminate the negative side and the push for the Christian religion to spread. This is shown, for example, by the various feuds in the background between Christians and Romans or Jews. Christians were not an adapting force to the prevailing miry Roman tradition… They were not warm gentle beings, guided strictly by STO and surrender to the outside world, without initiating anything that could be misconstrued. Someone really wanted Christianity to dominate…
However, I continue to maintain the positive sides of Christianity. Such St. Paul, whom I respect, for example, never writes about Jesus. He writes about God not Jesus. He writes about love, unity between people and evokes the spirit of Christ as a spirit that exists on the other spiritual side, a spirit of a positive nature, with whom he suggests to join together. This corresponds to my own attitude towards Jesus, about whom I wrote at the beginning of this post. It is simply connecting with energy and consciousness from a higher positive dimension and for this process to take place, work on love and unity with others is needed.
I suggest turning to Greek philosophy, for example, which can tell you more about positive part of Christianity than the Bible itself… For example, the philosophy of Plotinus and Neoplatonism will be very important. At the foundation of his philosophy. Plotinus writes about the the foundation of all existence as the One and according to him it is perfect and simple substance that is unknowable. This corresponds to Ra, which speaks of the Plenum, the One, and that creation is for discovering the unknowable (adding that creation is also the Creator itself).
Plotinus says that the further we move away from the One, the more we delve into the illusion. And the more we move towards the One, the more we come out of the illusion. Only One is perfect. Similar to Ra, which says that everything comes from One, and the further we move away from this One, the more distortions and illusions we enter. In turn, as we move out of the illusion and move towards higher Densities, our existence also becomes less distorted, until finally, when we reconnect with the One, we leave all distortions behind.
Plotinus speaks of three hypostases: “Hypostasis (plural: hypostases), from the Greek ὑπόστασις (hypóstasis), is the underlying state or underlying substance and is the fundamental reality that supports all else. In Neoplatonism the hypostasis of the soul, the intellect (nous) and “the one” was addressed by Plotinus.[1] In Christian theology, the Holy Trinity consists of three hypostases: Hypostasis of the Father, Hypostasis of the Son, and Hypostasis of the Holy Spirit.[2]” Source: Hypostasis (philosophy and religion) - Wikipedia
So the three hypostases were practically copy-pasted from Plotinus and Neoplatonism to Christian philosophy. And originally the Son of God/Hypostatis of the Son meant Logos. And what’s the point of pushing the famous carpenter here as the physical human being? It does not make sense. And it was never intended to make sense, it was to divert attention and create a cult of the mythical Jesus Christ. And the fact that Christianity, for example, is very much based on ancient philosophies and religions, and is nothing new itself, and is a processing and eventual expansion of that, is actually not surprising, because the development is gradual, and the concept of these already exists ideas, yet is actually very important and really spiritually developing!
And to sum up Jesus: as a mainstream version of Jesus Christ, this is nonsense, in my opinion. As an alternative version of Jesus, suggested at least by Q’uo, then I am willing to accept. Also, Jesus as a strictly spiritual being from the higher densities of STO is as acceptable to me as possible.
as the final embarkation point before Jesus embark on his ministry.
