Interesting. I had never really considered before whether the negative entities really have any “self talk,” per se …! I suppose they must … At least the Orion entities, and assuming all accuracy of interpretation.
[I feel the need, now, to state publicly for the sake of transparency that my belief system is not entirely in concordance with the information presented by Ra and the other entities channeled by LLR, though it is exceedingly close. There are differences in details that are generally, I believe, quite academic, but notable. My mind is open to all new information and I am actively integrating this on a daily basis, particularly as I draw close to concluding the original Ra Material and continue to explore. That being said, there are certain areas – and they are *remarkably* few and far between; hence my high degree of interest in this material – where my original interpretations of “stuff” differ from what is presented by Ra and other entities, and/or by those who have read the material. There is “old” terminology that I will sometimes use, still, not out of force of habit but for reasons of precision. One of those terms and differences is in the use of the term “demon” versus “STS Entity,” “Negative Entity,” or “Orion Entity.” To me, the middle two are interchangeable (STS and Negative) but the former “old school” term has different connotations to me than “Orion Entity.” I’m well aware that the consensus among the so-called “New Age” proponents is to state that so-called demons are, in fact, negative aliens or what have you but I wish to state simply that, while I respect and acknowledge this viewpoint, I am not so sure. I have shared my viewpoint with a couple of other people who are not familiar with the Ra material and to them, it makes perfect sense; however, it is out of alignment with the ontology of Creation as presented by Ra – or would, at least, indicate the stated ontology as semi-incomplete – and thus, my mention of it is indeed controversial as far as this forum is concerned. For now, I simply request the patience of others as I work through how precisely to integrate these viewpoints and terminologies into my existing framework.]
YES.
This section of the Ra material was most profound to me when I read it just a few weeks ago. I was, at this time, only beginning to coming to grips with the idea that an experience that I had was, in fact, a contact experience (something that I believed at the time but had worked very hard to deny, for “reasons”). Reading this was a profound relief to me. (… A little … Uh … Bizarre, given circumstances, but a relief.)
It is this sentiment that leads me to believe that the OP’s experience was more likely with a negative entity that was impersonating Ra than a lesson from Ra itself. I appreciate the sentiment expressed by others that it could be a signal for the OP to integrate or “deal with” some stuff, but, given that his/her “take-home message” was, “Ra gave me pain,” that seems unlikely, to me. Not only does it seem quite out of character for Ra to use pain as a teaching aid – at least from what I have read thus far of their channeling – but if that was its intention, it obviously failed miserably. Not only did the OP not have any immediate spiritual revelations following this pain, but he/she revealed in a subsequent thread that the experience happened a year or two ago, and in all that time, the pain is the only thing remembered. That just does not sound like Ra – or any positive entity – to my line of thinking.
I will not speak to my own experiences much here as this thread is about the OP, and the discussion surrounding his/her experience, which is dramatically different from mine. I wish to only point out a very very interesting point raised by Patrick, perhaps inadvertently, which is in his phrasing, “… what type of entity you contacted.” (Emphasis mine.)
In the OP’s case, the contact was intentional – he/she asked Ra for aid. In my case, as in many others’ cases, I did not reach out for contact. This made things, for me, dramatically more confusing.
All’s I can say about that is, “A-YUP.” 
) and I am getting 2 things that is all. But the consumer kid inside of me takes over and I leave with 59$ spent… at 1$ each… ya. That is kinda of how it feel every time I say to myself I’ll just say like … just one tiny little sentence and then… it just goes on and on and on:)
.