Thank you for sharing so much food for thought. In some cases, in striving to help another - our intent aligns to a benevolent agenda, it may improve STO polarization, it may act as a model of possibility for others, it may help bring a better side of us out, and it may actually help to make things better somehow. There may be some golden rule going on, help another and possibly we are better able to discover and receive help ourselves when we need it.
To help the environment, the concept of balance in global warming suggests that there’s carbon in the atmosphere that needs to be pulled out. Planting trees may help. Another thing I was thinking of was the idea of a seaweed, like a GMO seaweed that can survive in warm water, can pull a bunch of CO2 out, but not necessarily farmed, just planted like a forests in the oceans.
I think also, a lot of our carbon footprint is related to transportation. Instead of having a car and buying gas, we have everything delivered by big diesel trucks to our house, may not actually help reduce our personal carbon footprint. However if we can keep a garden or buy local produce, that may be like a baby step improvement. Mel Bartholomew’s square foot gardening comes to mind. The idea reduce, reuse, recycle may have come out of the Great Depression of the 30’s - where people grew mindful of not wasting much in effort to do the best with what they had.
A Russian doll model of government doesn’t seem farfetched, like some pecking orders at play but only a few at the top graduate as highly polarized STS. We share the world and tolerance of choice in polarization seems important for STO as contrast of what not to do. The idea that we urgently stop and do nothing - paradoxically, may benefit an STO beaten down by some STS agenda.
However, there are STO organizations that aim to provide relief to people contending with earth changes. There are non corrupt charities that operate transparent and efficiently route resources to those in need. LLResearch comes to mind, thank you. Maybe a form of helping is like a choice of attention - do we feed helpful attention to an STS organization or an STO organization, why or why not?
From a 6th density perspective, possibly spiritual mass related to toggling 5d negative to positive in some way more compatible with 6d. Such opportunity can seem odd, because it’s like an STO spiritual warrior in an STS environment - so not passing judgment as all people in STS organizations as STS polarized.
The Ukraine conflict might on some level demonstrate a 4d perspective that when cornered and loved ones are threatened, war is necessary. I think a 5d perspective is no, it is not - distance is the great peacemaker, better to drop your pride of home ownership and leave elsewhere in chance as alive, there’s better chance to help another. The idea of humility as a spiritual virtue may be a 5d lesson that many, many Ukrainian refugees are learning first hand. Giving charity for refugee relief may be a way to help.
Strange as it sounds, some say that 10% of the population control 70% of the money. I think part of the financial strain on the economy is economic disparity, and like many things in nature, imbalance gives way to breakage for better balancing ongoing. Short of breaking something, consciously encouraging charitable redistribution may help somehow.
In United States, health care costs seem on the up and up, and insidious as it may be - the health care system capitalizes on the misfortune of others. Big Pharm seems to get its claws in people of the older demographic where probability of health problems increases. Taking responsibility for your own health and well-being may be an alternative to supporting yet another STS agenda. But it is not all bad - I trust that enough STO health care providers are contributing in ways health care improves. In the extreme, people might choose to migrate out of situations of dysfunctional healthcare systems to places where healthcare is more socialized. If we cannot afford health insurance and a trip to the hospital renders bankruptcy, is there another choice? Proactively waking up to harsh realities may be a way of helping somehow.
The word responsibility rooting in an ability to respond, might be catalyst to evolve ourselves more agile in ways we can flexibly adapt to change in ways that we can still retain our helpfulness bandwidth. Pondering this, we take on roles that may not be our first choice - many people prefer living in a house over living in a tent. If we’re conditioned to live in a tent, maybe we’re more fearless of that situation if things ever came to thatt, and as more fearless maybe we can be more loving kind. And that idea suggests again the Archetype of the Choice, the fool as running on low baggage and is mobile - a sort of less as more approach. For some, strange as it sounds - giving things away, donating unused stuff and running lighter, may be a way of both helping others and helping yourself.
