That’s an extensive perspective - thank you for it.
I would not see it that someone get in the way - every other or new perspective can be helpful to think about.
Thank you for confirming this - sometimes it seems that such a view is denied for the Q’uo.
Really nice examples. 
when they are sitting in an expensive neighborhoods with a lot of land they are doing are good business or not? 
I would say these people are a mirror of the society and a system, that sells an illusion of safety and wealth.
Maybe the reason is that you can trace so many aspects back to the same cause?
This is a good proposal to handle this today.
I think there are many people who are feeling that nothing “is right” anymore, but they are not able to ask themself what are the reasons for it and the question is to painful, because of the cognitive dissonance.
When you talk with such people you can find out quickly how deep they are caught into some kind of (programmed) self-deception and if there is a real willingness for a change of thinking.
Mostly one leaves it then with a few careful questions to stimulate to think and which are then mostly accordingly fast displaced from the opposite.
My feeling is that the time now is less of enlightenment and more to think and reflect of any belief and acting.
Why does it always have to be limited to the two alternatives of fighting / not fighting?
That is why the concept of the difference between rebellion and revolution was presented.
I would say each density is acting with the given means according to their own level of development.
I never believed that i could change patrick’s opinion, but hopefully the discussion with him shows the different possibilities with their respective strengths and weaknesses that are given to us.
That’s the fascinating result and it shows that there is not “the one way” that is correct or better, there are only individual ways.