Why I Believe Our Logos Is Cruel And Mistaken. (As We All)

A warm welcome to you

I will start by saying that I do not know how to express my thoughts correctly so that they are understandable. The thought is simply within me.

It is such that I wonder why so many teachings call people “wrong, evil, unspiritual,” and how often I have heard that many teachings say roughly the same thing in their messages: “look at the state your world is in,” as if implying that everything is terrible and wrong.

But what is actually right? How can one define what is right? Undoubtedly, I would say, let’s look at the foundation. That from which everything comes, the basis. We have a body that we perceive every day; there is also something internal, an inner “Self,” a voice inside our head that allows us, at the most basic level, to be aware of our own desires and, in a sense, think to ourselves, for example, “I want to eat, I want to drink water.” These basic needs layer upon one another, intertwine, and ultimately the first thing we all truly want is to survive. This is a catalyst for pain; if one does not eat or drink for a long time, it becomes painful, and therefore people begin to invent ways and methods simply to satisfy their simple needs, to rid themselves of pain.

Perhaps I am expressing myself unclearly, and it is not understood where I am going with this. My point is that pain strongly influenced people’s choices. The struggle for food and simply a warm shelter/cozy hearth would not have been so cruel if there were no major problems associated with poor nutrition, for example, no diseases of the organs or body parts, and so on. But the body is structured in such a way that all of this required simply enormous effort. And primitive people clearly began to notice more in their search for survival, in their search to reduce pain—for example, performing various rituals, and so on, for something “invisible” that would grant a good harvest, luck, and the like. And the first “priests/mages/shamans” were highly revered because they worked for the common good and ensured survival. It did not even matter if you were just sitting there pretending; you would be brought many honors if your actions really brought luck. And later, when people were able to settle down, learned to create fire in “domestic” conditions, and pain finally subsided a little and quieted down, the opportunity appeared to start deceiving, to start taking more, because the pain still exists, the body still asks.

I would put it this way: “the body ruled the mind of ancient people,” or “fear and the unbearableness of pain ruled ancient people.” As you can see, the foundation—the body and its needs—ruled how people sought paths to survival. At first, it was unity, which was needed only at the initial stage when people were generally “stupid” and knew of no other ways; let’s say, there was no technology for it. But as soon as technology appears, as soon as the basic needs of the body begin to be satisfied better and better, more and more separation appears. And people simply begin to act more wisely—wisely from the point of view of survival and needs—and to use others; slavery begins to form.

And at this moment, I want to return to examining the foundation. Namely, the fact that people possess no developed mental abilities. There is no realization of the spirit. All they really had was a body, very weak and vulnerable to everything, which created a constant catalyst in the form of pain, in the form of an insane feeling of hunger and thirst for water, let’s say in the simplest form. I will also add here the desire for lust and reproduction. I can also add the structure of the body, which is such that it became much easier and simpler for people to learn to use their hands (rather than learning to think and use the mind), so people developed themselves physically, invented various tools needed for violence, and so on. There was no real need for any meditations or reflections on life, because all of that gave no result “here and now”; it was simply useless. All of this began to appear after a very long time, when humanity had already gone deep into separation.

And all because this was the most logical and reasonable way to survive, the most logical way to ensure that your loved ones and dear people would prosper, because everyone would want everything to be well for their loved ones, and thereby they resorted, consciously or not, to paths of separation, and this includes the accumulation of wealth (instead of giving it to the have-nots), the use of slavery, and one way or another the desire to enrich oneself and break out of the cycle of pain.

And all this is for the simple reason that from ancient times our ancestors were in such terrible conditions that left them no other choice but to do exactly this. Because the world is insanely cruel even now, but people have managed to adapt very well, and this is considering that they still have not been able to unlock the abilities of the mind. No one can remove pain by the power of thought, simply fall asleep at night by the power of thought, or materialize money in their hand by the power of thought to go and buy themselves delicious food. The problem lies in the foundation, in the fact that the body is so strong and the mind so weak, and all of this comes from the initial “experiment” on the separation of the conscious and the unconscious.

But what is the point of all these beautiful words? One can say it more simply: someone went and weakened people, weakened their abilities—be it some Logos or whatever one calls it, or whoever else did it—but it does not change the essence; people chose the most reasonable and logical way to withstand the conditions of this experiment. Therefore, it causes me sincere bewilderment why many “higher” beings complain and get angry that people are so stupid, oh how stupid, that they do not see beyond their own noses. But in me, this evokes irritation and a feeling as if I am being deceived, as if the real picture is being hidden from me.

I see the very cause and problem in the Logos, or the being who created all this, all these conditions. And also the fact of how strongly the “importance of free will” influenced all of this, but for me, this only means a desire to preserve the purity of the experiment, so that no one interferes, to really see what this will lead to. Otherwise, people would have been helped long ago and given the opportunity to open the abilities of the mind, given the opportunity to remove pain, to be wiser, to be stronger. But no, this all looks like a pure experiment. So that no one interferes. We “must” develop these abilities in ourselves, and God willing, someone will succeed. So that later, somewhere, we could use them, and apparently in those places the pain will be much less, and the beings there are much freer.

But it seems to me that they are unfree precisely because of this rule of non-interference, which allows every such cruel experiment to proceed “as it should,” so that people go through all these horrors simply because they were deprived of their “innate” abilities (if one can say that) to control the forces of intelligent infinity. In this sense, for me, our Logos is cruel because It allows such things to happen, and the entities that somehow try to judge the human race are foolish to me, because what right do they even have to judge if they most likely have not gone through this themselves? Perhaps their essences did not encounter such strong veiling as to forget about something important (about love and unity, for example), and this would stop them from cruelty. But our people were simply blind—although even that word is inappropriate for me to use; they simply did not see and could not see anything greater, and were we among them now, we would do the same, I am simply sure.

In a word, I feel deep compassion for all people, I feel how much is misunderstood and unfair towards all those who chose the path of wars and cruelty :broken_heart: . It seems to me that these people are deeply misunderstood. I by no means encourage wars, do not encourage any evil or negativity; I simply really feel that they are misunderstood by many “higher” beings who seem not to fully realize how deep the forgetfulness due to the veiling can be, and how all the conditions simply forced people to act in exactly this way.

It seems to me as if intelligent infinity itself wanted to walk this path, and could fully realize where all this would lead. But for me, it is cruel and wrong, because if everything is one at the deepest level, then you are simply allowing a literal part of yourself, your hand, to feel pain, and then you blame it (your hand), saying “well, why are you behaving this way? I ordered you to behave differently.”

I do not know if I was able to express this thought, but the essence is that unity inflicts pain upon itself; I see it this way, and I consider it wrong, and I consider that every such experiment should cease immediately, and that even the very structure of these densities, that which entities must go through—somewhere in the depths of my soul it seems wrong to me, that it shouldn’t be this way, that it could have been done somehow more wisely, and there would be more joy in living and sharing experience with each other, and so on and so forth. Unless infinity desires to suffer and simply goes against itself by choosing all of this. I simply cannot judge humanity, because everything is deeply intertwined and everything is truly not as simple as “higher spiritual scriptures” speak of, and this is what I am pondering and what I wanted to share today. :heart_with_ribbon:

1 Like

I too have felt this way from time to time. Especially when I start thinking about the Holocaust, and how all of those innocent people suffered under the hands of such cruelty. How could our Logos allow that suffering to occur. I wonder how if we are all One, I would desire any of this suffering for myself. I wouldn’t desire anyone to experience one second of the worst mental and physical suffering that I have ever been through and yet I know that I have never suffered anywhere near to the extent that a majority of people and animals are suffering through on a daily basis. When I think about the most intense physical suffering, I think about burn victims who survive and go through months and years of the most intense pain that a human being can ever endure . Why would the Infinite Creator want to experience such a thing? My mind can never give me an adequate answer for the suffering of animals and people that go on here on Earth. When it starts to depress me too much, I have to try to balance out that depression and find the joy. While I have truly never found any joy in my life, I am able to find a medium ground. This is by realizing that I am behind the veil right now; and since I am behind the veil, I must believe and have faith that there is a reason for all of this. I don’t have any of the answers, but I must have faith that all is well. The Infinite Creator that I believe in is LOVE, so I must have faith that there is a reason and a purpose for all of this suffering. There is so much mystery in creation. All I can do is hope for the harmony of ALL of the entities living here on Earth and on other Earths all over the creation. Maybe I will find the answers when I reach the other side of the veil. I hope you do as well. I hope we are both not disappointed by the answers as well.

2 Likes

The way I see it is that all experience is based upon perception. And I think that reality on all levels never truly changes, it’s just our perception of it. So as we move up through varying densities it’s still the same thing but we’re able to see it from a higher (different perspective). Maybe if we can only see less than 1% of the visible light spectrum now, perhaps when we’re in 4th density it’s a case that we can perceive more of that visible light spectrum?

I also think, with regards to suffering, you can see this as a perspective matter also. For what may be perceived as suffering to you may actually be perceived as joy to another. And I’m confident there are many entities in this creation that get joy from suffering. And it’s probably the case that these entities may experience suffering from what you perceive as joy. It’s all relative and the only difference is what perspective you’re approaching the situation from.

I also think that, as RA/Quo have stated, if we help to plan our own incarnations, that any perceived sufferings we go though in our lives, we knew would actually eventually lead to greater joy or at least a greater understanding. Perhaps not in this life but certainly in some experience to come.

I often meditate on the infinite nature of the creator, and if infinity truly exists it’s way beyond our current understanding. If you are infinite and experience all things then there is no joy or suffering really because you’re experiencing it all at once. So it’s just experience without the label of good or bad. It just is.

Also think about this. If pain and suffering did not exist then neither would pleasure and joy. Because without the polarity it ceases to be either a good or bad thing. It just is.

Going though bad times in life make the good times that much sweeter. and vice versa. Going up on a rollercoaster makes coming down that much more exciting. And if you couldn’t go up then there would be no way for you to come down. Does that make sense to anyone else?

We need pain to be able to experience pleasure, the 2 cannot exist without each other.

I’ve recently started trying to see even my own suffering as a gift. Not only as a chance to learn and to feel emotions (which is a gift in itself!) but also a sort of pendulum swing to the left… meaning I know when it eventually swings to the right, it will be that much more pleasurable because of it.

3 Likes

I would like to share three perspectives that might offer you some strength:

1. The First Principle of the Universe is Free Will, not Survival

You mentioned that “the body ruled the mind” because survival is the primary need. This is correct on a biological level, but within the underlying logic of consciousness, Free Will is the actual First Principle.

This means that although we cannot change the “factory settings” of the physical world (hunger, pain, and the threat of death), as conscious entities, we forever possess an absolute, inalienable sovereignty:

—The power to define our “internal response” to our circumstances.

The external world may force a painful script upon you, but the authority to decide “how to interpret this role” remains forever in your hands.

2. Absolute Freedom Behind Barbed Wire: The Answer from Viktor Frankl

You mentioned that ancient people had no choice but to survive. But I would like to cite a modern example to prove that consciousness can transcend the survival instinct.

Viktor Frankl was once in the Auschwitz concentration camp, where the environment was exactly as you described: hunger, extreme cold, and death. All evil deeds born of the need to survive were considered matter-of-course there.

Yet, in that extreme environment where all external freedoms were stripped away, he discovered an “Ultimate Freedom”:

“The last of the human freedoms: to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances.”

Living in hell, he chose not to let the environment assimilate him into a beast. He chose to maintain dignity within himself, even going so far as to comfort fellow prisoners. He proved that: Even if external conditions lock you down, your internal Focus can still define your state of existence. He eventually lived to be 92, and even climbed snowy mountains in his later years.

This demonstrates that while we cannot “remove hunger by the power of thought” (as you said), we can “transcend the fear of hunger by the power of thought.” This is the absolute sovereignty you possess.

3. True “Higher Dimensional Civilizations” Never Judge

You mentioned those “higher beings” complaining about human stupidity or even judging humanity. Your intuition is completely correct: such judgment itself is a manifestation of low-level arrogance.

In the true laws of the universe, evaluation and judgment are violations of Free Will.

A truly evolved civilization based on STO (Service to Others) deeply understands how thick the “Veil of Forgetting” is and how heavy the gravity of the material world is. Facing humanity struggling in the mud, they would feel only deep Empathy and respect, and would never point fingers from a position of superiority.

Conversely, any message that attempts to “judge” by demeaning humanity or manufacturing guilt often comes from STS (Service to Self) entities, or is simply a projection of the channeler’s own subconscious toward others.

So, please trust your intuition.

There is no need to accept those false judgments. In this challenging material world, being able to realize that “pain should not be the end” and feeling compassion for human suffering (as you expressed in your text) is in itself an extremely precious spiritual awakening.

You possess the absolute power to define your own life, no matter how loud the external environment may be.

2 Likes

Here is another alternative perspective.

The problem of survival puts pressure upon the nervous system, and this can be excruciating in difficult situations. Additionally, well beyond the confines of what the nervous system can work with directly, the intuitive mind can commune with transcendent beauty and experience life as a Divine Whole.

For instance, primitive peoples have had to deal with survival, yes, and they also produced immensely beautiful sculpture and painting dating back 30,000, 40,000 years. So, the ability to attune to transcendent beauty is given to us alongside the reality of the pressures of survival, they are equally our inheritance. This does not strike me as a definition of cruelty.

The key factor, if you are feeling oppressed by the perspective of the nervous system, is to add to your skill set the ability to back away from that focus of consciousness and redirect the focus of your consciousness into a different modality of perception which easily can attune to either the oneness of nature or the oneness of spirit. Some can do this in meditation, some can use hypnosis. The tools are there within you, but it’s one of those things that while fairly easy to do when you get the hang of it, it is difficult to initiate.

ADDENDUM

This passage gives some sense of what I mentioned above. What I described was not about healing, but the principle is similar.

For a healer, it’s a slightly different contact, but it is the same kind of result. The practitioner tunes itself by aligning itself to open up its truest, deepest and most honest self. It tunes to its own highest and best self. This is one of those areas into which we cannot probe because of the fact that Reiki teaching is of a certain type, and we would not wish to infringe upon the teachings of this particular kind of energy work. Nevertheless, there is tuning involved, and it is a freeing kind of tuning where much of the self is dropped away that is irrelevant to the essential or core self, and that core self is freed from its normal strictures and allowed to become the dominant part of the mind, body and spirit.

Mr. @C.U.T ( who speaks in a familiar voice, I have to say) and others mentioned that the perspective you choose, or your internal focus, makes a big difference. The tuning mentioned above takes this, one could observe, ahem, to a very different level.

Your feelings are very human. The entire premise of Confederation philosophy is that we are more than human. So this is something that will always linger as a conflict as long as you measure by an earthly yardstick. Only by subjectively proving to yourself the illusory nature of reality—and embracing faith when you cannot have even subjective proof—does the philosophy have a chance of being useful to you.

I have long embraced the idea that the law of one is a perspective, not necessarily useful as a capital-t TRUTH. I mean, I believe it is true, but how does my belief change my experience in this life on this planet, let alone yours? So I would encourage you to see the philosophy as the proposition that viewing reality as objects distinct in a field of space and in motion through time yields useful ethical, moral, and philosophical insights that lead to a richer, more fulfilling life. If this usefulness is to be embraced, you must be able to apply these insights to your life and see their usefulness for yourself. You can’t take others’ word for it!

So all that to say: there is no heresy in finding an alternative philosophy that better accounts for the life you lead. The key thing is to figure this out for yourself: to discover faith on your terms, not on another’s terms. I wish you well!

2 Likes

I want to take a second shot at this target, specifically, the classic question, How can any but a cruel Creator make conditions here that involve such intense suffering? How a person feels about this in their gut will depend on their personal experience and disposition, but I want to present it in an impersonal context of spiritual evolution because it is such an important question.

Human-level consciousness is a culmination of nature-level consciousness where each element of nature single-mindedly expresses the intelligence of nature that passes through it. The human mind reaches past this to express not just this, but also our own personal thoughts and feelings. For example, plants and snails don’t build lives based upon their individuated, abstract notions, but upon their interaction with nature only. Yet humans can do all kinds of other things because we have a freer sense of self, such as becoming a temple of light or killing people at random. But how do we learn to take responsibility for our creative activities?

Beyond human-level consciousness, what we are growing into, is spirit-level consciousness. This is similar to nature-level consciousness, except that it is spirit intelligence which is the main driver and most of the confusion of human-level consciousness has been sorted out because the entire scope of self has been explored, accepted and loved.

This is a description of Ra’s know the self, love the self, become the Creator. At the human level we explore the full extent of our creative capacities, including deep love, deep hatred, withholding love and so much more. Each of these experiences, as Confederation entities describe, are taken to the heart for love and acceptance, leading eventually to something close to the entire scope of self being explored and loved.

So, you see the progression. 1. Natural intelligence produces nature, plus a level of consciousness which is self reflective and seemingly independent. 2. This level of intelligence must encompass its full range of creative possibilities–including the darkest separation from the light–in love in order to work effectively in spirit. 3. It then moves on to doing works of creation on further levels of consciousness, allowing more and more of the Creator’s will to flow through our actions.

So, in this density only, we experience the misery of separation because this is within the scope of what we can create. If we don’t experience it and learn to accept it, then we cannot learn to become responsible for it in the long run, and this is a key point.

Furthermore, this is such a vital concept that 6D creatures flood in here to get themselves filthy in this process so they can refine the lessons they began long before, essentially, learning to more fully take responsibility for our capacity to channel both love and separation. Confederation entities call this learning to balance love with wisdom and power. Some things cannot be learned merely by talking about them, they must be met in so-called “real time.”

1 Like

A warm welcome to you as well, Dima.

I offer my portion on this contemplation: From my point of view, Dima, the fact that you - or any seeker- ponder these thoughts is clear evidence not of the cruelty of the Logos, but on the contrary, a true nearness to It. If more other-selves on this sphere resonated with the vibrations of the thoughts you shared here, I believe we would be spared from a vast portion of our lamentations.

The Compassion exemplified by your words that empathizes with the suffering of the world - and the universe at large - is exactly the kind of energy that characterizes the Unconditional Love of the Logos. This Universal Compassion is not only foundational to intimately appreciating the true nature of all Creation, but is also the the energy that forms the very fabric of the Mystery of Mysteries from which all Existence - throughout the Octave - originated and to which it all shall return. :medical_symbol:

To a positive seeker and a Brother and Sister of Sorrow, there is no doom; only opportunity, honor, and duty. :crystal_ball:

All correct statements made above belong to the Creator. All incorrect statements made above belong to me.

The Creator Knows Best. Peace and Joy. :deciduous_tree:

1 Like

I like this discussion as I have been pondering this question as well lately.

Through spiritual practices I’ve come to realize that there is a vast difference in the amount of joy beings experience here on earth.

And the creator did not make reality in such a way that you have to be a good person to feel joy.

The path of goodness, which is the path of feeling sorrow for the suffering of others requires a lot of emotional intelligence and basically involves becoming so empathic that we can truly exchange experiences with other selves as if we had the same experience. The joy here comes from merging with one another to the extend of having become the other self as equals.

The path of darkness involves manipulating others for our own pleasure, including increasing their suffering with the expectation that they will do as we please. It requires hierarchy and oppression. This dark path does not require a lot of empathy (how I currently understand it) but it does lead to questioning our own innate goodness. It includes making fun of others and not feeling bad about it. So it is hard on the self because to realize just how cruel of a person one can become, is actually very very hard in its own way. But to sometimes laugh about suffering can alleviate some of it. As if we choose to cry about the suffering we can take on our own shoulders and shrug of the suffering that we want more control over.

Considering the amount of suffering present on earth, it sometimes seems the dark path is easier than the light.

I for example, have difficulty feeling sad. I wish I felt sad more often but often feel that as a man I am not supposed to cry. And to truly surrender to my emotions feels also like a limitation in some ways. Crying more often would please me.

As a man it seems logical considering the expectations of society to choose the path of darkness as it is more in line with the expectations society puts on men.

Exceptions to this rule are the LGBTQ community where people can be whoever they want to be and explore polarity much more diversely.

Thats why I find great joy being part of this community even as a straight male. Simply because people are more allowed to be who they want to be.

I hope I dont come across as a bad person. I used to be much more light but sadly things happened that caused me to suffer a lot more than say where I used to be 4 years ago. Im trying to find my way and cope with what I have to go through every day.

2 Likes

I also want to believe that God is LOVE. I want to hope for it. And I’ve even started to periodically pray silently to myself at moments for the day to go well.

This all sounds good until the suffering becomes so excruciating that you simply don’t have the strength to fight. You can simply be extremely exhausted and see no positive side, you can break down from the pain or even do something to yourself. It’s a complex topic. The thought I ponder is that we don’t truly know other people, we don’t know what’s going on in their lives at difficult times. Perhaps there’s something more hidden behind a smile. Of course, I won’t be able to jump above my head, I won’t always be happy with everything; perhaps even finding a happy medium is a luxury for me, but I still think about how unity and mutual support can truly heal the soul and heart. Unity can seem so petty, meaningless, in a cruel world, but as soon as you find yourself on another plane of existence, perhaps even the plane of despair, when you can no longer live without others or simply don’t want to live without others, then I begin to understand that unity truly can heal the soul. It’s funny how the seemingly meaningless has the greatest meaning. I remember a phrase from Tao, something like, “Water is the weakest of all things, because it flows lowest, weakest of all, but that’s why it’s strong, because everyone needs it.” I think exactly the same about unity.

I admire people who have strong mental discipline and can overcome terrible things. At the same time, I’m beginning to think that in the past, there were people whose philosophy was contemplation, calm, and non-thinking. Simply put, they didn’t strive to live this life long, didn’t strive to cling to what, in their opinion, wasn’t worth clinging to. This is a lack of fear of death, and, accordingly, an absence of any difficulties, because you’re not afraid of failing because you’re not afraid of dying. On the other hand, there’s a person whose convictions are to fight, to fight to the end, to fight this world and dictate its rules, to live long and convince themselves that this is the right thing to do—not to give up. I don’t mean to say that I’m writing now some kind of justification for all those people who die prematurely, but simply that many life outcomes are based on inner convictions. For you, that person is a hero, since you cite them as an example. I think so too, but at the same time, we can’t imagine how much pain he experienced, how much he suffered, to simply continue living and following his beliefs, instead of simply leaving everything as is and even allowing himself to die. It’s not that terrible, really. It only seems terrible because of the fear of losing loved ones and the guilt that can arise. This is all natural. What I’m trying to convey is that our society is largely made up of people who believe in fighting, struggling, and suffering. And I look at all of this with great compassion. It’s all difficult to express in one message, but you really do need to listen to your heart. Although, more often than not, it’s better to understand your beliefs and whether they are yours or imposed from the outside. I really think this world is not worth fighting for.

I see the law of one as something inalienable, something that cannot be argued with, because I have been convinced many times that unity is the most useless and helpless thing in existence, and therefore it is the most needed by everyone and the most powerful among anyone. It sounds paradoxical, but I believe it is so. I can hate unity, despise it, but it still exists; at some higher level, it must be so. The picture in my head only forms if I imagine that we are all one. And yet, I feel hatred for many things, and it even amused me to think: why doesn’t God create a third polarity? For those who cannot stand the behavior of positive beings (not all, but most, and who dislike the idea of ​​densities and what happens because of this process on the lower densities), and also those who cannot stand the behavior of negative beings, who obviously create even more pain with their existence, which makes it even more disgusting. If such a thing existed, I would consider myself to belong to this third polarity. But as funny as it may seem, since I dislike both paths of service and see them as wrong, it seems my place is in the “funnel of indifference” (recalling Ra’s text). It’s just a funny joke.

Thank you, but I think you’re putting yourself down by saying your thoughts are somehow wrong. Everything is as it is. They’re your thoughts. Don’t judge them. There’s no need to judge them. I’ve judged myself for my own thoughts so many times, but then I realized that I was only hurting myself by trying to force myself to love God and the people around me. It’s better to let it flow like a river, smoothly and gradually. You can not believe in God, and then suddenly feel that you need this faith. Perhaps even this moment when you believe in the higher will pass, and will no longer be necessary. This is just my spontaneous thought right now. You really need to be able to give yourself the freedom to be angry at the creator or even hate him. This is normal; when you remove all external judgments, it begins to feel normal. There is nothing terrible about this. Rather, you are trying to see creation from a different side. Or try to better discern WHO you are at this very moment.

1 Like

I really hope you get better

Regarding crying, I’ve overcome it. I mean, I’ve overcome the thought that it’s somehow wrong. It’s all right, and if you’re thinking about crying, it means somewhere deep down you already want it. And I think you need to give it free rein because suppressing yourself only breaks you from the inside. And all this then literally manifests itself in your physical health. For example, at a relatively young age, I’m now experiencing blood pressure problems that I never had before. This means at some point in my life, I took on too much and didn’t notice how my own actions affected me and didn’t take responsibility for them. But you can take responsibility.

I completely agree about society’s expectations, but people are truly awakening now, and I can see it with the naked eye. Personally, I believe that modern technology plays a huge role here, allowing people to connect with each other and spend time together, such as TikTok and YouTube. I like it myself. Many different influencers, and even people themselves, are simply self-reflecting, and in general, many of them are truly compassionate and understanding. But many people are filled with fear and a ton of attitudes that prevent them from working through this fear. So I feel very sorry for them all. And I wish you never to feel alone, and remember that you’re not the only one who can truly get lost in the darkness. We’re all wandering in it, you might say. One way or another, I believe that love will prevail !

Thank you Dima, I appreciate your compassion and I find your thoughtfulness deeply inspiring.

The use of male pronouns to refer to the Creator is an interesting development in the evolutionary psychohistory of our planetary societal complexes. I cannot determine whether it has been to our benefit or detriment. If my understanding is correct, within the framework of Confederation Philosophy, the Creator is understood as non-binary. This may or may not be a helpful or clarifying point, so I will simply leave it to your discernment. :milky_way:

2 Likes

From your point of view I can see the truth of your statement. I don’t mean that cynically or condescendingly; after all, you’re not a nihilist, just somebody who – like many other great minds in history – seeks justice.

1 Like