I’ve already started creating example, @K.K.33, I took the session that you recommended me. After about 20% I stopped. I already tried to read it before. I failed and couldn’t give example. I didn’t encourage to ask to provide a excerpt that indeed has much meaning, because I know you do see the meaning.
But anyway, can I try to take any more or less random excerpt? I will describe the process how I read it.
Summary
To the part of your question about how or to what end such a being partakes in the evolution towards the One Creator, we may only say that because of the uniqueness of the advent of the life of such an entity, that the process of evolution may unfold quite differently from how you might envision for your own mind/body/spirit complex. We would offer a brief example that we understand you are familiar with, and that is the capacity for a particular location to have interacted with third-density entities in such a regular and intentional way that it too can gain the consciousness of third density. This, we understand, can make little sense from your perspective as a third-density entity that is a biological being and has certain ways of living and experiencing consciousness within your environment that make sense because it is what you are accustomed to.
But how can a location be self-aware? How can a mineral have the agency to evolve and to elevate its consciousness and interact with others in a meaningful way? We find this is a difficult analogy to consider, but offer it as an example of how the pathway of evolution and how any particular mind/body/spirit complex might engage in the process of evolution in a way that is quite foreign to you. And we believe that should such technology and entities as artificial intelligence gain this capacity, it would, indeed, be quite a foreign and difficult experience for you to grasp within the current veiled conditions of your third density.
To the part of your question about how or to what end such a being partakes in the evolution towards the One Creator, we may only say that because of the uniqueness of the advent of the life of such an entity, that the process of evolution may unfold quite differently from how you might envision for your own mind/body/spirit complex.
They say that entity may mistake and see evolution not as it is. I don’t know why they are saying it because it looks obvious, but probably it’s connected to whet they will say next.
We would offer a brief example that we understand you are familiar with, and that is the capacity for a particular location to have interacted with third-density entities in such a regular and intentional way that it too can gain the consciousness of third density.
It’s hard to grasp the sentence because of many words that looks redundant but I’m trying to understand why they use it. Why “brief”? Why they are mentioning they think one might be familiar? Also, if they are not not sure if one is familiar why not just saying about the example? I’m feeling my brains memory buffer is becoming overloaded trying to match all these things. They say the way is regular and intentional. If by regular they mean systematic it’s obvious again or I don’t understand something. I’m staring to think what regular is if what it means in this case. Maybe “usual”? If saying about intentional, do they mean that it’s entity who has intention to interact with location or location has intention, or maybe both of them? Maybe they mean that interaction may not be necessarily intentional but want to highlight that in this case it is intentional. I should think why they highlight it.
This, we understand, can make little sense from your perspective as a third-density entity that is a biological being and has certain ways of living and experiencing consciousness within your environment that make sense because it is what you are accustomed to.
So they say the said above can make little sense for us, but do they mean the interaction has little sense? Or the capacity for particular location? Or the uniqueness of the advent of the life? Or they all they said before? They say about limits of third-density entity, why they are doing it? I already know it and they said it two sentences before. Also they say “third-density entity that is a biological being”, do they mean forth-density (or upper?) entity is not necessary can be biological? I’m starting to think what biology is, why they mentioned it here, coming to conclusion that entity must by biological, but it depends of they word’s meaning, so maybe here they mean biology not in sense that I think. They say “because it is what you are accustomed to”, they probably refer to “this can make little sense”. Looks like they mean if third-density wouldn’t be accustomed it will have more sense. Do they mean third-density can be not accustomed or they just highlight this fact, and if they just highlight why they do it?
But how can a location be self-aware? How can a mineral have the agency to evolve and to elevate its consciousness and interact with others in a meaningful way?
Ra have few places with question marks. For example
94.24 Ra: I am Ra. This perception is correct, O student, but what shall the student find the bird to signify?
94.25 Questioner: I would guess that the bird signifies that a communication that comes as catalyst signified in Card Three is accepted by the female and used becomes a portion of the experience. I’m not sure of that at all. Am I in any way correct?
Ra: I am Ra. That bears little of sense.
another example
91.20 Ra: I am Ra. Look again, O student. Does the hand reach within? Nay.
First question is directed to the student, second one is rhetorical and there’s a answer after it. In case of Quo’s question I don’t understand what’s it, looks like it’s rhetorical, but the next what they say is
We find this is a difficult analogy to consider, but offer it as an example of how the pathway of evolution and how any particular mind/body/spirit complex might engage in the process of evolution in a way that is quite foreign to you.
It doesn’t look as an answer to the questions and I don’t understand what analogy they are saying about. I cannot see analogy in the previous statements. I’m going deep into that analogy and thinking if can I interpret this word in my own way. Next they say about example. What example do they mean? I think it’s not related to the questions. They previously said about evolution (that third-density entity cannot grasp), I think they are saying about it. They said that evolution of “location” (second time they used “minerals”) what makes me thinking location and minerals are not identical in the example, but I have no idea why they differentiate them and if they do, in the example statement do they refer to the evolution of location of evolution of minerals. But I have no idea why at all they stated such a long passage instead of saying that not only “mineral and water life upon the planet learning from fire and wind the awareness of being”, but they learn from third-density entities as well. Also I have no idea why it “makes little sense”.
I’m finishing my example with
And we believe that should such technology and entities as artificial intelligence gain this capacity, it would, indeed, be quite a foreign and difficult experience for you to grasp within the current veiled conditions of your third density.
If they just say “artificial intelligence would be foreign and difficult experience” it would be more understandable but they add “current veiled conditions of your third density” (what make no sense to my opinion) or “indeed”, and the “indeed” word again makes me thinking that they agree with previously said statement (I omitted whole text, but I hardly can find what the confirm by “indeed”).
I apologize I didn’t untangle all I could because I already feel completely exhausted, but I feel all said above by Quo could be easily fit into one sentence. Nevertheless all other extra words makes me feeling I missed lots of the speech, because I don’t know what prevents them from expressing more briefly.
I have a feeling that there’s no any thing Q’uo are sure: “we may only say”, “example that we understand”, “This, we understand, can make little sense from your perspective”, “We find this is a difficult analogy”, “we believe that”, so don’t know why they are stating about “little sense from your perspective as a third-density entity” if they are so unconfident.
Finally I’m recalling this quote
3.9 Ra: I am Ra. The vibratory distortion of sound, faith, is perhaps one of the stumbling blocks between those of what we may call the infinite path and those of the finite proving/understanding.
You are precisely correct in your understanding of the congruency of faith and intelligent infinity; however, one is a spiritual term, the other more acceptable perhaps to the conceptual framework distortions of those who seek with measure and pen.