Hello seekers and readers,
This thread is to explore a more subjective viewpoint about the materials.
Out of curiosity, what have resonated with you in the materials? and what have not?
This could be taken as linear or non-linear. (Something that didn’t resonate, and you find it to be later, or vice versa.)
I am curious if we all have have similarities in our study with the law-of-one.
This also open different perspectives to view the “distortion” of how Ra, Q’uo, Social Memory Complex understand and disseminate the materials.
Or I should say, their “version” of viewing creation, the infinite creator. Etc. etc.
For me, what resonated the most was the talk of “duality” in all, the polarities.
When I first started, this rang truer than anything.
The reason is because everything in life seemingly to be in “tandem,” or “two.”
Day/night, life/death, positive/negative, right/left, male/female, the two hemispheres, etc. etc.
So these early understanding of the world I exist in would naturally help me understand what the materials was talking about, especially when it came to polarities and the dualism nature of creation.
The part that didn’t resonate with me was the transition between 3rd-4th. Etc.
The talk about 4th density beings that are coming in, or dual bodies.
Talk about big-foot, Etc.
The council of 9 and Andrija Puharich, etc.
Some stuff from the tarot talk.
This is just from the original trance channeled materials,
For the conscious channeling… Well there’s a lot of “hit or miss” stuff there too.
But so far, the talk about Mormons and that Joseph Smith got his materials from “aliens” was confusing, and unclear. (What aliens? positive or negative?)
I feel there were information that were purposely avoided so there wouldn’t be lash back from other religious entities. I wished that there were more queries within that category… e.g. Who was Rumi? or Osho? etc. Maybe even sadhguru?
I find some of the talk that revolves around people wasn’t resonating much because the materials talk about “some” people, like Hitler, Crowley, Rasputin, Patton etc. But others were avoided, especially if it would step on somebody or other organizations toes. And of course, the “infringement of freewill, etc.”
Materials on those things were wishy-washy, so it didn’t resonate.
Please feel free to share yours, perhaps there are gaps, here and there that each of us can bring to the table and share our experiences.