It’s almost funny how easy it is to completely forget about this while dealing with daily obligations. At this moment I’m feeling that I should set time aside daily just to take this in.
I wonder if there’s an internet group where people do this together? There ought to be at least one somewhere, methinks.
Hey, @flofrog, maybe you and I should start one up? Maybe we could drag @Patrick into it as well?
1 Like
I am all for it Mirror !
This just doesn’t seem correct to me. In the first place, Q’uo using linear judgement themselves to lift the linear judgement away so they are coming into self-contradiction. Secondly, it is renunciation of part of the creation. Instead, it has to be understood, including limitation of the linear judgement. From their words it came out to contradition between “the sacredness and the worth of each and every entity” and “linear judgment” when in fact there is no such. Q’uo are creating division.
If we distil any communication to its most basic attributes, it quickly ends up becoming a form of control if we choose to see it that way.
Because whatever is suggested (including what I am saying in this post), it becomes a form of persuasion, even if a very mild one. Persuasion which could be called influence, which could be called manipulation, which could be called control.
I think if we could be aware of all the thoughts of humans when they read Q’uo (or any source of information), we would see that there is always someone that disagree or we could say: having a divided opinion. Hence the division you speak of.
So, Q’uo still chooses to speak with us knowing all of that. And they can only ask that we disregard anything they say that does not resonate with us.
I never found a solution to this conundrum, other than perhaps staying silent all the time, and even then we are likely communicating with our eyes alone when looking at other selves. We are in the furnace of third density (athanor) and we cannot completely get away from getting burned. It’s in part what we came here to experience.
2 Likes
You’re right, and I definitely sure that silence is not a way out. I mean it should be the endpoint, but we are not at the endpoint.
I also thought that how Q’uo are saying is when you move from below to above. In this sense next step is a kind of denial of previous one. When I was saying I meant when you move from above to below, so the next step is integrated with previous one. But if you look on the whole construction as static there should not be contradiction.
Saying “no contradiction” I mean I accept there are contradictions so there should place for them once they are invented. They are just there.
Hope it makes sense.
Keep persuade if another side is OK.
I would say my point of view on other words. There’s an opinion when you have triangle, then quadrangle, then pentagon and so on you are approaching to the circle. So you are moving from particulars to generalities. I think it’s just multiplying contradictions, so instead of three of them you will have million. If you need a circle you take compasses and draw circle.
So probably multiplying angles can be a way, but in that sense as a way to understand a futility to draw a circle this way.
Sorry for multiple replies, just want to add: in service to others there should be the other; in silence there’s no other so it might transform into service to self.
Well, true service-to-self requires that it be done at the expense of others. So, if one is all alone then it does not really qualifies as StS the way the Confederation means it. 
The way I read the passage, the sense of it is this: Do not simply look at things on their face, but look beneath at the other levels of being and meaning in order to have a richer experience of your life.
“Linear judgment,” as I view it, is a reference to only using the linear, logical faculty of mind to explore life, as compared to intuition, creativity and deeper levels of insight.
2 Likes
I agree with reservation that it is reverting but not stepping forward in the sense Ra used these words:
41.14 The appropriate true color for third density is, as you have ascertained, yellow. However, the influences of the true color, green, acting upon yellow-ray entities have caused many entities to revert to the consideration of self rather than the stepping forward into consideration of other-self or green ray. This may not be seen to be of a negatively polarized nature, as the negatively polarized entity is working very intensively with the deepest manifestations of yellow-ray group energies, especially the manipulations of other-self for service to self. Those reverting to orange ray, and we may add these are many upon your plane at this time, are those who feel the vibrations of true color green and, therefore, respond by rejecting governmental and societal activities as such and seek once more the self.
Can you say phrase “under the hood” is applicable here?
Yes and no. “Yes” to looking at other levels of being, but this can be done with excellent linear thinking and judgment–or not.
For example, if someone asks you a question, you can just respond at face value to the facts pertaining to the question. Also, you could consider that if you answer with as much love as possible, you will doing a much deeper service than simply responding to facts, possibly lifting the spirits of the questioner.
It seems to me that the larger message is more about responding to life through the heart than about tinkering under the hood. But why not do both, right?
2 Likes
Yes, I agree with all you’ve said. 
3 Likes