I think that’s the difference between forth and sixth densities’ approaches. Q’uo say about faith as something one just accepts it, so the uncertainty still exists. It’s because they want to enjoy it so the process can be infinite. But Ra say about measure and pen when one wants to re-check everything so that this uncertainty will disappear and only spiritually the faith will be left. So they admit they still might be wrong, but it becomes relatively less mystery-filled but still remains mysterious. In other words with less distortion as “fidelity towards the attempt to remove distortions is total”. Of course, the knowledge is (still?) limited:
82.14 Our knowledge is limited. We know of the beginning but cannot asseverate to the precise experiences of those things occurring before us. You know the nature of historical teaching. At our level of learn/teaching we may expect little distortion. However, we cannot, with surety, say there is no distortion as we speak of specific occurrences of which we were not consciously a part. It is our understanding that your supposition is correct. Thus we so hypothesize.