Oh yeah and I like your quote you posted. It is a special form of torture to know much, speaking of normal material illusion knowledge here, but be ruled by the cruel often ignorant themselves who the masses follow like sheep to the slaughter.
And very lonely besides my mate, who I now feel like I child next to after this ra stuff… rapidly changed her in a positive direction and she hasn’t even read it, I just introduced some basics and she remembered or something and then the lights that in the sky started but they are not too informative as I ask them to intervene and they comfort but just say “it will be as it will be”, thanks for the comfort but whoever or whatever they are I could use some direct directions, give the free will a break please and help if you love us so much!
And my mate just says things without reading this stuff like, “it’s not a battle, it’s a dance”. Where have I read that before? And when I was laughing about us fighting off a fairly obvious and unskilled negative encountered on 4 aco dmt and enjoying schadenfreude about the punishment it’s master would inflict on it, she felt sorry for the stupid thing. I’m like, was zum fick, that thing just tried to take you away from me. And she’s picking up random bits of glass walking the dog and I just say what’s the point, the nukes are likely soon, but it somehow makes her happy doing that and I just look at the dog, shake my head and tell the cute wolf that we can go in a bit, your mother is engaged in higher density bs.
Second density is so much easier to make friends with than third…
I find it somewhat comforting as well after I got over being freaked out and mind blown everything is an illusion I feel to me it my only “reality” anyway so might as well enjoy it and make the best of it.
Yeah, I could never get down with asceticism or denying pleasure as long as I’m not hurting anyone, second density that isn’t bacteria or a parasite included in anyone. So most popular religious sects put me off, pretty architecture sometimes though.
It’d be nice to have something like a cross between a sacred gathering and a rave though…
Merry Christmas or merry today if you don’t do that. I’m going to walk the dog on the beach with my mate and then we’ll take psychedelics, meditate together and see if any non bodily parts of the creator, locally, have anything to say. I’m probably going to have an alien tell me to go volunteer at a charity rather than binging on drugs and video games. Again. They’re really after that lately… no respect for introverts with social anxiety sober, these aliens! alright leaving my, ahem, “office”…
Negative utilitarianism is a form of negative consequentialism that can be described as the view that people should minimize the total amount of aggregate suffering, or that they should minimize suffering and then, secondarily, maximize the total amount of happiness. It can be considered as a version of utilitarianism that gives greater priority to reducing suffering (negative utility or ‘disutility’) than to increasing pleasure (positive utility). This differs from classical utilitarianism, which does not claim that reducing suffering is intrinsically more important than increasing happiness. Both versions of utilitarianism hold that morally right and morally wrong actions depend solely on the consequences for overall aggregate well-being. ‘Well-being’ refers to the state of the individual.
A definition that shows no ways of realization or solving the (real) inner causes for suffering and happiness.
There is this dangerous word moral that is very different from ehtics, because moral can defined as needed.
Émile Armand - Anarchist Individualism as a Life and Activity
All healthy organisms have a characteristic tendency to reproduce themselves. Organisms which are sick, or in a process of degeneration. have no such tendency — and this applies to the mind as well as the body. So the anarchist individualist tends to reproduce himself, to perpetuate his spirit in other individuals who will share his views and who will make it possible for a state of affairs to be established from which authoritarianism has been banished. It is this desire, this will, not only to live, but also to reproduce oneself, which we shall call “activity”.
These considerations explain our title: “Anarchist Individualism as Life and Activity”. Tending to live his own individual life at the risk of clashing intellectually, morally, and economically, with his environment, the anarchist individualist at the same time tries to like himself, are free from the prejudices and superstitions of authority, in order that the greatest possible number of men may actually live their own lives, uniting through personal affinities to practice their conceptions as far as is possible.
The anarchist individualist does not live in intellectual isolation. As individuals who share his ideas increase in number, so will his chances improve of seeing his aspirations realized, and as a result he will be happier. As individuals of his own “species” increase, so will the power of environment over his own life diminish. The wider his propaganda spreads and the more his activity grows, the more will his life be intensified.
His relationships with his comrades are based on reciprocity, on mutualism, on comradeship, and take numerous forms, all voluntary: free agreements of every type and in all spheres; respect for the pledged word and the carrying out of promises and engagements freely consented to. It is in this fashion that the individualist of our kind practices mutual aid in his species.
A conscious individual — seeking to create and select others — from being determined by his environment, he tends to become self-determining, to live his own life fully, to be active in the normal sense of the word. One cannot conceive the anarchist individualist in any other way.
Yes - the german word “Unter-haltung” for enter-tain-ment does show it better - “keep under”.
There is the nice word Wetiko that describes it maybe better?
This sounds like to fall into a belief of a new religion (New Age)?
This can be seen as an attempt to present something unavoidable positively.
But it is possible to use the informations from Ra in a very different manner for an inner development.
Yes - there can be only information / learning that offers the possibility to realize more options to live / use your incarnation.
I’ll save this. But I’m not really into a lengthy debate on philosophy right now. So my response will be short.
My philosophies are idealistic.
There is likely no way to implement them without first using positive eugenics, not to remove diversity, but to remove cruelty and selfishness and greed from the human organism while vastly improving intelligence.
Of course to accomplish that one would need total control… and those that seek power always seem to be the worst to have in power. Marcus Aurelius situations are rare.
I’m into this primarily for the ufos. The ra thing was interesting but I never order my life on any ultimate authority, I explore many things. It is strange that my senses have on occasions as objectively as senses can confirmed certain things in there. But while Ra seems quite nice, in fact I’d like a 3D one, an actual one not a wanderer, for a platonic friend, with all this mention of this law of confusion, I’m not sure I trust a lot of the specific strange information.
My mate is not particularly into so called new age unless you consider the more reasonable parts of ra new age. She mainly reads technology and science fiction. Certain entities certainly seem interested in her though…
What I do know for sure is, unless we fall back on this entire experience being a hallucinations and others or other selves, if you prefer, are not even real is this:
Ufos exist and they are likely what is popularly called interdimensional. Something about us interests them and it doesn’t seem to be material resources.
There exists irrefutable evidence for reincarnation.
Something really weird is going on and it would appear that in some way consciousness is more fundamental than matter.
I won’t actually know anything for sure until I die.
Humans are generally tribalistic and exhibit idiosyncratic insanity. Emotion ultimately rules logic. Thus any information transmitted via one is questionable at best.