Is God the same as the One Infinite Creator?

Newcomer Corner
21

I grew up in Lutheran education and was required to take a catechism class, wherein we studied Luther’s Small Catechism. We classmates joked around that, according to how we learned the materials, “God” was a technically-acceptable answer to any question asked by the pastor. Sure, if someone actually answered a question they didn’t know with “God”, the pastor might ask those wise guys to be more specific, but he would never say anyone was incorrect. The same seems to apply to the One Infinite Creator.

To my understanding, the term “One Infinite Creator” overlaps entirely with the Christian “God”; casting God as an omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient creator of the universe pretty much encapsulates the term One Infinite Creator.

This perspective of God as the One Infinite Creator is shared across the Abrahamic religions (which includes primarily Christianity, Judaism, and Islam as well as Baháʼí Faith, Druzism, Mandaeism, Mormonism, Rastafari, and Samaritanism), where “God is one, eternal, omnipotent, omniscient, and the creator of the universe”.

As Quid noted, Hinduism includes the concept of Brahman, which is considered “pervasive, infinite, eternal truth, consciousness and bliss which does not change, yet is the cause of all changes” and is the “creative principle which lies realized in the whole world.” That seems to fit the One Infinite Creator quite well.

Taoism includes the concept of Tao, which is variously called “the underlying cosmic power which creates the universe”, “Source of all existence”, and “the One, which is natural, spontaneous, eternal, nameless, and indescribable.” These descriptions align Tao with the One Infinite Creator.

Buddhism does not appear to explicitly consider something that can be called the One Infinite Creator. However, “Zen Buddhists regard the Tao as synonymous with both the Buddhist Path and the results of it, the Noble Eightfold Path and Buddhist enlightenment.”

The Yoruba religion includes Olorun (or Olodumare), who is credited with “creating the universe and all living things…and is thought to be omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent”, which seems like alignment with the One Infinite Creator.

Also, concerning Christianity, the Bible uses many different names to refer to “God” which range from purely referential (such as “El”, meaning God, and “YHWH”, known as the Tetragrammaton, from where the terms Yahweh and Jehovah originate) to descriptions of God’s attributes or qualities (such as “El Shaddai”, usually translated as God Almighty). The Bible also contains the concept of “Godhead”, generally referring to the essence/nature/unknowable aspect of “God” (Among the Abrahamic religions, Mormonism most attempts to elucidate the Godhead.)

Furthermore, as Patrick notes, the New Testament flips the script in the first few verses of John when it says, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God.” Note that the English term “Word” is “Logos” in the original Greek. I have to wonder if Ra used Logos as they did to point to these verses.

1 Like
22

Yahweh of the old testament was a negative social memory complex according to Ra. When people pray to god, they might be praying to those negative beings. That’s why the old testament was full of violence and slavery.

23

The term “One Infinite Creator” overlaps entirely with everything, with Ants, With Cats, With Planets, With Suns, With Ra, With Yahweh, With You, With Me, With Galaxies, With Space, With Time. Thus the focus is on the “Infinite” which means “border/edge less”, there is nothing that it’s not the One Infinite Creator.

That which is infinite cannot be many, for many-ness is a finite concept.
To have infinity you must identify or define that infinity as unity; otherwise, the term does not have any referent or meaning.
In an Infinite Creator there is only unity.
– Ra

Thus You are the one infinite creator.

You are every thing, every being, every emotion, every event, every situation.
You are unity.
You are infinity.
You are love/light, light/love.
You are
This is the Law of One
– Ra

Yes that’s the beauty of Siddhartha’s methods, he just teached the method of “Self Discovery”, without telling what will the self eventually discover.
He did mentioned that the end state is Nirvana (Blown Out like a fire in the candle getting extinguished).

image
image1920×1080 64.7 KB

According to Ra, there are two Yahweh, one is Yahweh, a confederation entity who helped through genetical engineering, for entities in Mars to continue their reincarnation on Earth. The other is an Orion entity which also use the same name, Yahweh who communicate with Moses, drafted the negative commandments (The Thou Shall Not) as part of the ten commandments, established an elite / hierarchical based structure with Priestly class of the Levites and so on.

In both case, Yahweh Confederation and Yahweh Orion is a finite entity, just like Ra, you or me and still part of the One Infinite Creator, as infinite doesn’t have any border or edges.

Jesus, specifically did not use the same name, he uses the term “Abwon D’Bashmaia” (Aramaic) which then translated to “Heavenly Father” in English. Perhaps Jesus did discovered on who or what Yahweh which interact with Moses really is and decided to use different name as a reference to a totally different concept and meaning.

24

Yes, the One Infinite Creator is in everything, though it’s still useful to delineate between a cup and the One Infinite Creator. The original question was more if “God” == “One Infinite Creator” from a theological sense and less if “Cat” == “One Infinite Creator”.

That reminds me of the koan from Stargate SG-1: “If you immediately know the candlelight is fire, the meal was cooked a long time ago.”

25

Yes if one mapped the word “God” in meaning to “The Infinite”.
Then: Jesus is God, Ra is God, Yahweh is God, You are God, I am God, He/She is God, They are God, Sun is God, Earth is God, Galaxy is God etc…
To the extent that the statement of “My God, Your God, Their God” will then become meaningless or illogical.
Implied: the infamous statement which allegedly came from Yahweh of :
“You shall have no other God beside me” will also become meaningless/illogical.

Given:

You are gods; you are all sons of the Most High
-- Psalm 82
2 Likes
26

Yeah, I agree. Loved what you have said here, thank you.
Elohim is spelled with an “im” on the end and not with the Hebrew letter Yod/Y…(as far as we know bc truly we do not know 100% as this is what we are taught or told,lol).
God in the Jewish community will spell this out as G-D. Leaving the vowel completely out of the word. If I look at the two letters G and D from a Hebrew perspective; which may read backwards therefore, D-G; I would then use the Hebrew Alephbet D=Daleth (signifying door) and G=Gimel (signifying camel).
Gimel is linked to the High Prietess, Key #2 and Daleth is linked to The Empress, Key #3.
Another thing we could keep in mind when we meditate on these ideas that are linked to God (the One) is that All is Mind. The notion that God has a universal meaning I feel is a little in error as God is a very subjective experience with universal attributes of which most of agree upon. One thing would be, It is Infinite, It is above the lower desire world, It is above Universal Law, etc…
If we look back at the word Gimel/camel we could understand that the camels were used for “long” distance journeys over different landscapes and did the work faithfully of course when treated well by its master. Gimel is the Subconscious mind. If we look at the word Daleth we could understand she is the purified desire that creates in abundance and never stops creating. She is also connected to the Subconscious mind as you can read in the texts that Ra has given when we treat our Subconscious mind like a maiden, a virgin with purity of desire, thought and request. 'You are what you think", because All is Mind. Anyway, these can only be small clues I have written and that I have used for myself during meditations and thought it could help someone else.
Yehweh is a “god” and played an important role in Creation as Elohim do, generally speaking. Other have also played specific roles just as Lucifer, Arhiman, The Seriphim, The Thrones,etc…These are angels, higher beings, creators, gods…
You are also a creator. First comes thought or an idea, then comes the creation of your thoughts whether you create art or a circumstance on your life. The only thing a human could do to improve his life is to purify his lower desire world and learn the lessons of love and wisdom.
Welp, I thank you Quid. Thank you very much. Have a blessed day!

1 Like
27

mdavidletters

28

You’re welcome Dieu9

I just want to add a bit of (not so important) information.

This is related to the “Yahweh / Moses Commandment”

Thanks to Ra, we now know who or what this “Yahweh” who interact with Moses really is:
https://www.lawofonesociety.com/index.php/religion/how-negative-forces-uses-fiery-phenomenon-to-fool-ancient-prophets-to-portray-them-as-god

Regarding “Name”, in contrast, Lao Tse said this:

The Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao.
The name that can be named is not the eternal name.
The nameless is the beginning of heaven and earth.
The named is the mother of ten thousand things.
Ever desireless, one can see the mystery.
Ever desiring, one can see the manifestations.
These two spring from the same source but differ in name;
this appears as darkness.
Darkness within darkness.
The gate to all mystery.
– Lao Tse, Tao The Ching

1 Like
29

I enjoyed your write up regarding the Tao.
God, to me is a title to describe the powerful, omnipotent of the entire creation but is 100% completely nameless and barely comprehendable to human understanding. We can verify this through many writings from ancient philosophers who have tried to describe God or The Source of All in All and still fail to do it.
However, on the other hand, we use some powerful names in rituals and ceremonial magic and this is where you may see people or a people requesting to use these names with respect and in wisdom thereby never taking them in vain.
Ok so then what do we do when describing this One or the lesser gods? I think use your own expression for the time being and sooner or later, as one grows in their personal evolution, they will yet find a better way that expresses the Creator according to their own relationship with the One.
As for me, understanding the Tarot and studying the Tree of Life (Qabalah) has helped me to develop a deeper understanding of our Creator but never a complete one (I am a mere mortal, haha).
-blessigs, Quid

30

There is no ‘more’ or ‘lesser’ gods, ‘higher’ or ‘lower’ ranked entities.
However, such line of thinking is indeed being proposed, followed, enforced, doctrinized and dogmatized by STS / negative entities.

Because…
In order to ‘control’ other entities, the other entities need to be ‘lowered’.
We are ‘master’ and you are ‘slaves’.
We are ‘higher’ and you are ‘lower’.
We are ‘gods/divine’ and you are ‘mortals’.
Afterwards, among the (so called) mortals… they ranked it further.
We are ‘the chosen’ and you are ‘the unchosen’.
Among ‘the chosen’, ranked it further…
We are ‘priest’ / ‘nobleman’ and you are ‘merely peasants’.

Quoting “lawofonesociety” explanation link above:

When dealing with Positive Entities, there’s absolutely no feeling of elitism or the enslavement of other Beings. In Unity, there’s no concept of separation.

Sarah explained it in great depth here:

1 Like
31

Heirarchy instead of lesser. As in duties performed, duties according to abilities

32

The Orcs, Sauron, Gandalf, Treebeard, Frodo, Legolas, The Elves, different role in Lord Of The Rings universe, but all of it is equally Tolkien, no role is greater Tolkien or lesser Tolkien. Although Sauron said so, as he is Tolkien’s role as antagonist, trying to control and subdue others.
“I am your master!” said Sauron, “You must obey me! or punishment awaits!”
Thus different distinctive role yes but all is equally divine, all is equally the one infinite.

2 Likes
33

Not at all was I implying that there is one being more divine than the next. My wording failed me is all. I made the correction I do believe. I am hoping my correction and explanating will suffice.
I think it is fairly clear, until we reach 7th density and become one with the Creator there is this imbalance, distortion or illusion per se. As far as I can tell, that needs to be balanced which may signify that things are dual in nature; a black and a white or light and darkness, etc. It only varies by degree. Going back to what I was attempting to say, “you cannot, nor can I, perform what Metatron performs” and neither are we expected. However, will we? Yeah sure. Perhaps maybe once we leave this place and return home to 6th density. Who knows really. I, no way was implying the slave and master role. Although there are so called masters that guide us if we so choose. Not meaning master over another but rather mastership over the lower rays and who has become a worthy teacher and student.

Taking the Lord’s name in vain as far as I can tell is not usig it for your own selfish ends, using it to make yourself look better, more powerful or perhaps the group you lead. I am very cautious about what I read in the Bible. Sometimes going to the Strong’s Concordance and looking up the actual transliteration of certain words help or meditation helps. However, I think it is not safe to go on what we have been taught at this point. Possibly only a fraction of what we have been taught and how we have been taught could apply to the truth. Only because of centuries of misunderstandings and wrong, errored teachings based on emotionalism and possible enslavement of another’s ability to think for oneself.

1 Like
34

And Metatron cannot performs what you can perform.
As Gandalf cannot performs what Frodo can perform.
Gandalf the powerful wizard is wise enough to see what Frodo can perform which he cannot, as thus he sees Frodo as the perfect ‘ring bearer’.
Gandalf is Tolkien just like Frodo is also Tolkien, there are reasons why Tolkien created the role of Gandalf and Frodo distinctively different, although both are played out and experienced by the same person; Tolkien.
Even Gollum has a distinctive role to play which Gandalf or Frodo cannot performs.

“My heart tells me that he (Gollum) has some part to play yet, for good or ill, before the end”.
– Gandalf

By discerning the “Dark” you will also discerning the “Light” as it’s opposite.
As both, the IS and IS NOT are created in opposing pair for discernment.
For example: the opposite/inverse of “Hierarchy” (STS/Negative Social Structure) is …

1 Like
35

Bashar had an interesting information regarding the above statement allegedly of Yahweh.

Quoting Bashar:

They weren’t Commandments or they have been misinterpreted over time.
For example you say in your literature now that the first commandment is:
I am the Lord your God Thou shalt not have false gods before me.
The original text is;
I am all that is, anything that you represent me by is also me.
Therefore there can be no false gods.

If that’s the case I agree with Bashar, if God=The Infinite, there can be no false gods and anything/anyone is God.

1 Like
36

I’ve been down that rabbit hole, too, man. Thinking about the nature of God and the Infinite Creator can really make your brain hurt, but it’s also kinda mind-blowing.

2 Likes
37

Yes, but personally, it has helped to free ‘my avatar’ from the grasp of fear and separation caused by ‘organized religion’ that he was born into.
The key focus is on the word “Infinite” and not on “The Creator”.
Focusing merely on “The Creator” might caused the brain trying to think about finding a separation/differentiation between “The Creator” and “The Created/Creation” (The Not Creator).

1 Like
38

If the average person experienced the Infinite, could they handle it?

39

Any form of entities is actually finite part(s) of the infinite.
Thus “were/are/will handle/handling it”.
English grammar starts to break down… thus inadequate to describe the infinite.

1 Like
40

image
image640×852 105 KB

1 Like