Understanding "All is One"

Strictly Law of One
1

‘The Law of One’ in its essence its incredibly simple at its most fundamental level. “All is One” However the why is a bit more complicated. After having to make some sense by the source material and with the help of both ‘Claire Dartez’ work and the YouTube videos of TWSMandelker . I think I’ve come to an explanation that makes enough sense for me (after many failed attempts) by understanding the First distortion of Free Will. Hopefully it is useful to someone.

First I want to Quote Ra in session 1.

" I am Ra. We communicate now. We, too, have our place. We are not those of the Love [density] or of the Light [density]. 1 We are those who are of the Law of One. In our vibration the polarities are harmonized, the complexities are simplified, and the paradoxes have their solution. We are one. That is our nature and our purpose.

We are old upon your planet and have served with varying degrees of success in transmitting the Law of One, of Unity, of Singleness to your peoples"

Below is my understanding of the Law of One and its first distortion. Hopefully someone gets something useful out of it.

The One Infinite Creator.

The One Infinite Creator must be all things (It must be Infinite).
That means the One Infinite Creator must be what it is not (Paradox).
It must contain something that it does not have. (Paradox)

What is the One Infinite Creator? (one/unity , infinite/all )
Then what is Not the One Infinite Creator( many/complexity , finite/partial)
This Notness must be apart of its own self/creatorship but it also must Not be at the same time.

To meet the requirements of itself it must pull off a trick to solve its own paradox.

An Illusion of separation of itself.
The concept of Illusion offers the possibility of being something while not being something at the same time.
Separation allows for manyness and it implies that something is finite (because to try to separate infiniteness you just get infinity)

But this trick of Illusion of Separation is not enough! Its just an Illusion its not really the One Inifinite Creator.
Its a poor magic trick act and not that of a true Magician.

So what is missing from this Magic act?
There are two problems with the magic act.

  1. That the Illusion/separation is not real.
  2. The Illusion/separation is still not complex. (Its only a single separation)

So what is the One Infinite Creator to do?

It comes to a solution through handing over its entire power to the Illusion/Separation!
The One Ininite Creator says hey you can do everything that I can do. (It gives it Free Will)

Ill start refering to the Illusion/seperation with the power of the creator as the ‘Co-Creator’

So has the problems with the magic trick been solved? Has the solution to paradox been fullfilled?

  1. Is this Co-Creator real? (yes)
    The Illusion/seperation has the ability to do and be everything the ‘One Infinite Creator’ is.
    Including the power to become unity. Unifying with the all. Dispelling the illusion of seperation.
    So it truely is the One Infinite Creator.

  2. Is the Illusion/separation complex? (yes)

The Co-creator with the power given to it by the ‘One Infinite Creator’ allows for complexity within iself.
It does this by allowing the Co-creator to create other sub-creators within itself (other devisions).
Allowing for seperation/boundary/manyness while all parts still having the power of the ‘Infinite One’
where All is the One Inifinite Creator living in an illusion of seperation.

The ‘1st Distortion’ / ‘The Free Will Illusion’ give us a few things to consider and a bit of food for thought:

  1. The first major takeaway is that we are the solution to ‘Paradox’ our finiteness allows for the One Infinite Creator to be Truely what it is
    and that our expression is essential and necessary for the ‘One Infinite Creator’.

  2. Why is ‘The Choice’ an essential aspect of our existance? A decision between Unity or Separation. Infinity or Finity.
    Where we can express our desire for our Finite aspects or Infinite aspects.

  3. Why Free Will is so important. And why higher density beings try not to infringe too heavily upon it. To give Free Will
    is to empower others with the power of the ‘One Infinite Creator’ and in turn empower yourself. And to deny it is to deny
    yourself the power of the ‘One Infinite Creator’. Or to put it simply to Hurt others is to Hurt yourself
    and to help other is to help yourself.

3 Likes
2

There is one point I’d like to contribute: “Why must The One Infinite Creator need to make it’s very self negative for the negativity to exist?” That is an implication of lack in the Creator. While the Creator is All.

If you remove that premise, the rest of the discussion becomes unnecessary, and I think you’ll really like this, God is way simpler and cooler than you ever thought! Isn’t that happy happy awesome!?

There is no UnGodness, and there never will be for all God, for there is only God, and all you need is not the death of God, which is what giving your free will to separation from God would be, but the life of God, who you are is all that you could ever need, you are God, the full vastness of God, the world, the Universe, and anything you have ever imagined beyond negativity and illusions. The Universe, Life, and Everything’s secret is therefore.

I love your post. One more thing I’d love to note is that it’s not a single separation, it’s individual separation, so just because one chooses darkness, you need not choose darkness yourself, my friend, all you need is God. Always with you.

Thank you.

1 Like
3

There is no UnGodness, and there never will be

Yes I agree. God is All. Its just that the separation/unity distortion is the way the paradox manifests itself in the Creator to produce that All-ness.

“Why must The One Infinite Creator need to make it’s very self negative for the negativity to exist?"

We know that the Negative path exists and it is part of the Creator. I don’t think that even a single entity
needs to express the Negative Path only that it is a possible path available through free will (although highly undesirable) to take.

Quo mentions that ‘True separation from the Creator is the only evil’ This I am on the fence about. Quo tells us to also use our own judgement. I am inclined to give Quo the benefit of the doubt and agree but for some reason I have an intuitive gut reaction to not believe it. Maybe its because I feel there is no True separation from the Creator. Im not sure. A lot of beliefs I have on the negative path I don’t feel like I have a solid grasp on and am only going based on a poor gut feeling. So my views on how to view the negative path are uncertain at best. Although I know for certain that it is highly undesirable path to take.

1 Like
4

I think RA answered your question with this conversation. I’ve bolded two sections but everything is equally important.

13.5

QUESTIONER Thank you. Can you tell me of the earliest, first known thing
in the creation?

RA I am Ra. The first known thing in the creation is infinity. The infinity
is creation.

QUESTIONER From this infinity then must have come what we experience
as creation. What was the next step or the next evolvement?

RA I am Ra. Infinity became aware. This was the next step.

QUESTIONER After this, what happened?

RA Awareness led to the focus of infinity into infinite energy. You have
called this by various vibrational sound complexes, the most common to
your ears being “Logos” or “Love.” The Creator is the focusing of infinity
as an aware or conscious principle called by us, as closely as we can create
understanding/learning in your language, intelligent infinity.

QUESTIONER Can you state the next step?

RA The next step is still, at this space/time nexus in your illusion,
achieving its progression as you may see it in your illusion. The next step
is an infinite reaction to the Creative Principle following the Law of One
in one of its primal distortions, freedom of will. Thus many, many
dimensions, infinite in number, are possible.
The energy moves from the intelligent infinity due, first, to the
outpouring of randomized creative force, this then creating patterns
which, in holographic style, appear as the entire creation no matter which
direction or energy is explored. These patterns of energy begin then to
regularize their own local, shall we say, rhythms and fields of energy, thus
creating dimensions and universes.

QUESTIONER Then can you tell me how the galaxy and this planetary
system were formed?

RA I am Ra. You must imagine a great leap of thought in this query, for
at the last query the physical, as you call it, universes were not yet born.
The energies moved in increasingly intelligent patterns until the
individualization of various energies emanating from the Creative
Principle of intelligent infinity became such as to be co-Creators. Thus
the so-called physical matter began. The concept of Light is instrumental
in grasping this great leap of thought, as this vibrational distortion of
infinity is the building block of that which is known as matter, the Light
being intelligent and full of energy, thus being the first distortion of
intelligent infinity which was called by the Creative Principle.
This Light of Love was made to have in its occurrences of being certain
characteristics, among them the infinite whole paradoxically described by
the straight line, as you would call it. This paradox is responsible for the
shape of the various physical illusion entities you call solar systems,
galaxies, and planets, all revolving and tending towards the lenticular.

QUESTIONER I think I made an error in asking that question, getting ahead
of the process that you were describing. Would it be helpful to fill in that
great leap that I mistakenly made?

RA I am Ra. I attempted to bridge the gap. However, you may question
me in any manner you deem appropriate.

QUESTIONER Could you tell me . . . taking the question previous to the
one that I asked about galaxy and planets, would you tell me the next step
that occurred after that step?

RA I am Ra. The steps, as you call them, are, at the point of question,
simultaneous and infinite.

QUESTIONER Could you tell me how intelligent infinity became, shall we
say—I’m having difficulty with some of the language—how intelligent
infinity became individualized from itself?

RA I am Ra. This is an appropriate question.
The intelligent infinity discerned a concept. This concept was discerned
due to freedom of will of awareness. This concept was finity. This was the
first and primal paradox or distortion of the Law of One. Thus the one
intelligent infinity invested itself in an exploration of many-ness. Due to
the infinite possibilities of intelligent infinity, there is no ending to many-ness.

The exploration, thus, is free to continue infinitely in an eternal
present.

We are SO early on the way back to the One Infinite Creator / to the Source.

5

RA I am Ra. This is an appropriate question.
The intelligent infinity discerned a concept. This concept was discerned
due to freedom of will of awareness. This concept was finity. This was the
first and primal paradox or distortion of the Law of One. Thus the one
intelligent infinity invested itself in an exploration of many-ness. Due to
the infinite possibilities of intelligent infinity, there is no ending to many-ness.

The exploration, thus, is free to continue infinitely in an eternal
present.

Yes my original post is trying to explore the relationship to why the concept of ‘finite’ is the first and primal paradox. And why being finite has anything to do with ‘Free Will’. My struggle with the first distortion was why the two concepts of ‘being finite’ and ‘having free will’ had anything to do with each other.

I think a large part of the struggle is trying to understand that both being finite and being many is really the same concept of sorts. Because for something to be one of many implies that you are not everything. You are partial (finite).

However to have the free will of the creator means you have the power to do and be everything the creator can do or be. You are both finite and infinite. We are both the paradox and the solution to the paradox.

The paradox is that the infinite creator must be finite to be infinite.

6

Eternal Present.

This is where “manyness” takes place.

RA I am Ra.

(…)

The exploration, thus, is free to continue infinitely in an eternal
present.

Eternal Present is in fact Infinity itself.

QUESTIONER Thank you. Can you tell me of the earliest, first known thing
in the creation?

RA I am Ra. The first known thing in the creation is infinity. The infinity
is creation.

- and this is how The Creator was born:

RA I am Ra. Infinity became aware. This was the next step.

RA Awareness led to the focus of infinity into infinite energy. (…)

The Creator is the focusing of infinity (…) intelligent infinity.

As I understand it, we are individualized portions of that Infinity.

Seth said a lot about our Ego - not in a negative way. It is a portion of our Consciousness directed exclusively outward, toward the material reality. Its main goal is to navigate us through the material world with all of its laws and properties. But it also rejects those data that do not fit to its Picture of Material Reality. It’s truly a Focusing filter for consciousness submerged in the material.

However, Ego trapped itself by narrowing its perception exclusively to the material, at the same time trying to understand Self as something more. Ego is Afraid. Mainly of pain and dying. To perish and be no more. That’s the cruelest consequence of the Veil. This is also a very direct way of experiencing the concept of “finite”.

But there’s more. That is the most important information.

1 Like
7

I would agree with all of what you have written here. We are free to continue repeating 3rd density. This is also a single octave so according to Ra so we also keep repeating these octaves. I also agree that the Creator represents Infinity. The first Distortion is just that a Distortion its not the first thing so I also agree with you on that. Are you disagreeing that you don’t believe that we are made up of multiple distortions of the Creator as a mind/body/spirit complex? I agree with you we are very far down from the source as a third density being and we aren’t just a single distortion.

8

I think it’s more than just representation.

RA I am Ra. Infinity became aware. This was the next step.

RA Awareness led to the focus of infinity into infinite energy. (…)

The Creator is the focusing of infinity (…) intelligent infinity.

There was Infinity. At some point it gains awareness. I wonder if the focus was an infinitys’ experience of gaining awareness or that awareness caused the focusing of infinity as an act of will. The will of the conscious infinity. From this quote, for me, Creator is an Infinity that became Aware.

Yes, we are distorted in many, many ways. But I think there’s also a beauty in each distortion and that each can be explored with delight.

I don’t know about that. I think there may be countless Octaves existing simultaneously in the eternal present.

28.16

QUESTIONER Are you saying, then, there are an infinite number of octaves
of densities one through eight?

RA I am Ra. We wish to establish that we are truly humble messengers of
the Law of One. We can speak to you of our experiences and our
understandings and teach/learn in limited ways. However, we cannot
speak in firm knowledge of all the creations. We know only that they are
infinite. We assume an infinite number of octaves.
However, it has been impressed upon us by our own teachers that there is
a mystery-clad unity of creation in which all consciousness periodically
coalesces and, again, begins. Thus we can only say we assume an infinite
progression, though we understand it to be cyclical in nature and, as we
have said, clad in mystery.

We perceive time in a line manner, there was the past, there is now and there will be the future. So for us there was a previous octave, there is now an octave and there will be next octave as well. However, I suspect that in the Eternal Present there indeed are an infinite number of octaves existing simultaneously.

9

The 1 Infinite Creator Simply CANNOT Create Somthing That Is Not 1 With Itself.

No Outside Of God Is No Creating Outside Of 1 Infinite Creator Therefor All Is Within It

10

(post deleted by author)

1 Like
12

Just like conditioning can be helpful for our intuition, understanding can be helpful in the context of love.
While I agree that love as I understand it, does not require understanding to be.

13

Mm. Understanding implies you are separate from what you understand. All is One is about love. So, it cannot be understood. You must love only the truth. Not know.

14

is what you wrote here above how you understand it?
if you are not communicating what you understand
and seek to develop your understanding,
what do you consider yourself to be doing
in a forum environment?

I do try to keep my understanding transparent,
fluid and open to change

All is one is about love,
Your understanding of this
is aligned with my understanding,
we share a mutual understanding right there.
I don’t consider it an act of separation
to refine my understanding
of when I’m in or out of alignment
with love and compassion

1 Like
15

Yes, this was poor choice of wording on my part.

I would agree, That’s why its just a distortion of the reality of the creator. An Illusion of separation.

1 Like