Is God the same as the One Infinite Creator?
Or is God the Logos of just this Universe?
I believe there are millions of Universes in this Octave.
Perhaps God is the entire Octave, where the Infinite Creator is all Octaves.
Is God the same as the One Infinite Creator?
Or is God the Logos of just this Universe?
I believe there are millions of Universes in this Octave.
Perhaps God is the entire Octave, where the Infinite Creator is all Octaves.
If you mean the Christian God, then yes that is the One Infinite Creator.
The Christian god is JHWH (Jahwe) and it is an invention to keep the people from the One Infinite Creator (that has no name).
In the vedic writings there are used different names for âgodâ to show the different aspects that can be seen in the creation.
I thought of God as a universal Logos. But the One Infinite Creator beyond all Logos.
YHWH is the name that humans gave to God, but I donât think it has a name either.
âThe first known thing in creation is infinity. The infinity is creation. Infinity became aware. Intelligent Infinity became aware of the concept of free will.â
âIn the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.â
âThe 1st distortion, free will, finds focus. This is the 2nd distortion the Creative Principle or Love.â
Taos is not understood, Taos is not found, Taos canât be explained⌠Taos is.
Nothing exist out of infinite creator
The word âGodâ has many interpretations, so itâs best to first query what is oneâs definition of the word.
HoweverâŚ
There is a single definition that cannot be mistaken with something else.
That is âInfiniteâ, something that is borderless has no limit or boundary in any dimension.
Once such definition came up then it cannot be mistaken with something else.
As there could only be one infinite as multiple/many infinite is an impossibility.
For example:
From Wikipedia; The Hindus defined âBrahmanâ as:
The pervasive, infinite, eternal truth, consciousness and bliss which does not change, yet is the cause of all changes.
So yes Brahman is the same as âThe One Infinite Creatorâ.
Yet when one mentioned the word âgodâ to the Hindus, they will think that itâs an English word of âDevaâ (shining beings) and there are many deva (or god); Shiva, Krishna, Vishnu, Ganesha et. al.
They are finite and not infinite given there are many of them, each have their own unique characteristics. Thus in such understanding the word âgodâ here is not the same as âOne Infinite Creatorâ or Brahman.
In Ra/Quoâs lingos such âgodâ or âdevaâ in meanings is mapped as âEntityâ.
A âSocial Memory Complexâ entity perhaps, either 4th, 5th or 6th density entity.
The names that the Hindus use are I think more like different aspects of the Infinity though.
Itâs interesting as now that I am growing âoldâ I am in the impossibility to give Creator a face, an appearance of any sort, while when a child I had this image that I was caressing His face to make Him not be sad⌠lol, while now and for many years thereâs no gender, no appearance, no nothing itâs just⌠there. that exquisite loving feeling of ocean engulfing.
I really love how you put that. Iâm always looking to deepen the love.
And so does any other names that used by anyone.
As infinity, has infinite aspects thus infinite names, if one need to named it using symbolism of sound. Yet every aspect has a boundary, that is used to define the aspect and not the aspect.
While infinity does not have any boundary.
Interestingly, Christianity labeled such view as âPaganismâ, the one that theyâre âfighting againstâ.
I was once asked âDo you believe Jesus is god?â, which I answered with âYes, as godly as you and meâ. Which then they will try to refute the âyou and me are godlyâ while insisting the exclusiveness of âJesus is godlyâ, because seeing that everyone (and everything) are god is a âPagan beliefâ.
As you look about you in your daily experience, in the meditative state, look and see the One Creator. Feel, in some essence and some degree, the Creator within yourself seeing itself through your eyes. When you see other entities moving about you, see the Creator. When you look into a mirror, see the Creator.
â Quo, January 11th 2020
Thank you Quid !. I guess we are little Pagans whom I always loved !!
YeahâŚYHVHâ ××××â
Jehovah, said Yah-Ho-Vah
This is but one aspect of the One in the Western Tradition; in esoteric Christianity and not exoteric Christianity.
Also, YHSVHâ × × ×Š × × (Yehshua, Yehoshua, Yeheshua or Joshua)
And many, many more including ADNI Adonai
We wonder on this⌠perhaps here/now in this space/time, any âwordâ is within limitation due to matters like âconfaionâ and suchâŚ
I ask; if no word here/now can describe this wholly, then the essence betwixt the thought and the word is something to observe? correct?
As for âentityâ called âYahwehâ Ra did mentioned them on some occasions.
So does Jesus or Yahshua⌠(4th density positive entity)
Ra refers to them as âentitiesâ and rarely or never uses the term âgodâ.
Thus in such context, the term âgodâ is not the same as the one infinite creator.
A good additional depiction given by law of one society website editor is as follow.
The âprophetsâ (individual or subject), âsincerelyâ believing that they were actually speaking to, or getting a message directly from a âLoving Godâ, or to be more precise, from âThe One Infinite Creatorâ. This, for the most part, was emphatically not the case.
A great example of this type of mind manipulation was the âburning bushâ, as witnessed by Moses. It is to be noted that the so-called âTen Commandmentsâ was passed-on to Moses via this type of âthought-formâ manipulative method.
Any entities of âPositiveâ orientation would not use such method due to few reasons, and some of these are mentioned below:
No Positive Entity will give any command to control, enslave or to manipulate other Being.
With Positive Entities, Freewill of the Contact (Individual/Prophet/Messenger) is extremely paramount.
No Positive âGodâ will tell/instruct/command you to kill, or take the life another living Thing, itâs virtually impossible, unless youâre dealing with a Negative force, who requires, for the most part, perverse of nature, blood and sacrifices of all kinds.
The One Infinite Creator is full of Infinite Love, Compassion, Understanding, Peace and Harmony. Negative Entities are basically the total opposite of these.
No Positive Entity will think to portray to you (objectively or subjectively) that youâre better than another person (or Entity), good or bad .
When dealing with Positive Entities, thereâs absolutely no feeling of elitism or the enslavement of other Beings. In Unity thereâs no concept of separation .
Positive Entities are extremely humble.
enjoyed/enjoying, this/that.
What if our solar system was one cell in our creators infinite body as above so belowâŚ.it answers all the questions
In love and light
Bob
I pondered the path of Buddhism in this regard, and resolved that likely in a perspective of all as divine, the word god as inseparable in all regards seems to offer
little utility - hence the conspicuous difference with
other spiritual practices.
However the practice of
recognizing another as an infinite creator seems
to accelerate growth in the law of one.
So this subtle
difference may distinguish law of one practice from
Buddhist practice, even though I believe the eight
fold path perspective offers advantage over others
in offering more neutral perspectives observing
creative manifestations with minimal distortions.
I believe Buddhists seem a minority within the
spiritual world, and law of one seekers an even
more extreme minority, hence some alienation.
A density challenge may be salt and water,
how the infinite creator resides in ways that
foster spiritual experience. Itâs easier to
recognize divinity in higher densities.
I donât think so, the first time I heard about âreunification with the entire universeâ was from a Buddhist. When we talk about âNirvanaâ vis-a-vis âHeavenâ in Christianity. I was deeply entrenched in Catholicism during that period.
And when Ra mentioned about 8th density / Octave I instantly recall the conception of âNirvanaâ and Dharma Chakra with itâs 8 section. And the number 8, symbolize âinfinityâ (â)
From my personal point of view, Siddhartha is a teacher of Yoga, a sanskrit word for âUniteâ. He teaches the way / method for âself discoveryâ and not âwhat you will discoverâ nor âWhat you must believeâ.
Thus the reason why he never mentioned anything about âGodâ or âDevaâ or any âGod/Deva/Deity worshipping practiceâ.
God or god is just a word, donât go crazy on a word. Itâs a human thing.
The One, The One Infinite; theyâre all just words to describe something that is abstract.
Yes of course, thatâs why need to deep dive on the actual meaning.
Word is a symbol, sequence of audio frequency referring to a meaning.
And then compare whether the meaning is the same.
The word; El, Elohym, Yahweh as written in the Tanakh is referring to a finite entity, based on the description. Israe-El, those who wrestle with El, quite literally a wrestling match. Yahweh, the story is well known and I have quoted above and what Ra (another finite entity) have to say about it. Those hebrew words is then translated to either LORD or God on english bible.
Yet when one uses word to refer towards the infinite, then there will be no mistake as it refer to the only one who has no border. Example of such ancient words are Brahman in Hinduism or Tao in China.