From my personal understanding, I don’t believe in a personified creator or god controlling and mastering everything.
I don’t think it’s appropriate to define the creator using personified terms like ‘good’ or ‘evil.’
I think that the creator or god exists within all things, representing an abstract of the whole—similar to the relationship between the body and its cells, or society and individuals.
You can only see the body when you view all the cells as a whole.
You can only see the society when you view all the individuals as a whole.
You can only see the creator when you view all as a whole.
For all is within, you are the creator.
I think another James Hinton’s quote may be relevant here:
God has no ‘self,’ no entity, because no ‘not,’ no darkness. This self in us is the darkness put for the Being. This ’ no darkness at all ’ involves infinite meaning ; for how can there, to our conceptions, be that wh is light and no darkness ? The source of light surely must be dark. So to us love is self-sacrifice. To us no love is without a not-love ; but God is all love. We conceive of a Being, as loving; i.e. as of light from an opaque dark source ; but God is not such ; there is no not-love in Him. As we see God with a self, He sacrifices Himself. He only does not sacrifice Himself, because there is no self in Him ; because He is more perfectly love ; not because He is less so. The self is from love and the ‘not,’ and where there is a self there is redemption. So the Devil too, I expect, has no self. But as we must regard him—as having a self—he is self-indulgent, self-asserting, self-seeking.
Self, and personality, is to us(exists only from our perspective). God is Love, but to us, God is self-sacrifice. So maybe from God’s perspective, there is no good and evil. But from our perspective, i.e., to us, there is good and evil.
By the way, I think terms like self, personality, good, evil are so fundamental that there seems unlikely to be some concise definitions of them. And maybe their meanings will change with the changing of our perpectives.
This is also the story of ‘TOBIT’ in the book of enoch and was removed from the Bible
Tobit, a pious man , buries dead Israelites, but one evening while he sleeps he is partially blinded by a bird which defecates in his eyes; he later becomes fully blind after physicians place ointment in his eyes.
I will not be reading any of your four books through my filter. I believe you are being manipulated by the Orion group. Disseminate, misinformation, confusion and misdirection there is only one path forward, no going back NO FEAR, NO REGRETS.
ONLY LOVE/LIGHT and LAUGHTER
I feel a great sadness inside, every time I see people, our brothers and sisters, who are searching, but in the course of their search go somewhere wrong. To places where sanity ends, love ends, and a kind of obsession begins.
On my journey in search of sense, I have encountered many different texts. I have read various texts of religions, texts of someone’s revelations, calling themselves ‘knowers’. And in the midst of it all, you could feel the obsession, the idea that it was more important to learn some kind of mystery of life than to just go for a walk right now, to get some fresh air, to enjoy this real life that is passing you by, and the people who are around you, to whom you can give warmth. It’s really that simple, to take and say warm words to a person, just to wish them a good day. It’s a deep obsession, and I think it’s all from wanting to get away from the world as soon as possible. To get away from any responsibility. That’s how I feel when I see texts like this. These people want to escape from their heart.
It is important not to forget the ordinary life, the beautiful things among all of us. The Law of One shows me this more than any other material, because in all other materials, when I read them, I had the impression that they were trying to get me off this planet, to forget about ordinary people, and to focus only on some supposedly secret knowledge of the truth.
Well, when the signal from the heart is very weak, you have to meditate. Then it becomes clear that no knowledge is needed, because everything secret is not real knowledge, but every truth, it is in front of our eyes, and even becomes more visible when we look into each other’s eyes.
I am too hasty to create this post before my understanding of these four books have matured and perfected to a certain degree. Sorry for all the confusion and messes.
Ordinary service in ordinary lives is not denied as useless. I have found another two quotes that may allude to the path of serving others:
With regard to sacrificing interests to appearances, observe : tho’ perverted, it is a regarding others instead of self; but it is this for the sake of self that is the wrongness of it ; it is not for their sakes, but for ours, at last. It is a ‘self’ sacrifice of self, like asceticism: there is the same wrongness in both ; it is a seeking self thro’ others. But is not this why it cannot be put down ? why, foolish as it is, and satirized and ridiculed, it lives ? It has its rightness ; to be destroyed, it must be fulfilled, interpreted [as the law had to be].
The service-to-others path has to be fulfilled and then interpreted. What is “interpreted”? It has to do with dialectics and I don’t claim I understand an iota of it. But I think I just somehow know that dialectics is the tool for approaching truth.
And also this quote:
The manyness comes from the materialness. Even mentally one sees how they are one. Without his material nature clearly man is one. First destroy this separateness of men and make one humanity again ; then the separateness of man and God : this is redemption.
So in my delusional mind, I think service-to-others is true and real, harvest to 4D and 5D and so on is true and real, in order to make humanity one again, and, then, after we become one, we then just have to sacrifice our mind/self, and be one with the true God, not with the Creator Self as we mean it.
Sorry for further confusion that may be caused. But I think there are just too many things to talk about and I am just overwhelmed by it. I think and I hope those who are resonant with the Confederation messages and the dialectics will find these four books useful.
This edgy topic reminds me of an another
idea that comes from a study by Brene Brown
on boundaries. That is, some of the most
Compassionate people are found as having
well kept boundaries which enable positive
outlook assumptions.
LOVE/LIGHT 
