Introduction
I wish to humbly offer a very interesting apparent perspective of oneness.
Free will gets violated, even if you constantly love and give, and look at darkness just as intensely when successful and at peace externally.
Therefore, I have found it very important to investigate the level of beliefs. If the issue is not that you are sending out negativity, what are we not understanding about reality?
First, let us trial the idea of "sacrifice".
To love, you need to give at your own expense - This is true, in the sense of burning ego, but this has merged with a concept that has poisoned human thinking through the past centuries.
The ethics of duty have led to Stalin, Pol Pot and Hitler. There are many, many necessary denials and ideas that are not the self-evident laws that originate from oneness, but I will enumerate the ones I have found inside that I believe are most important:
Contents
Part 1 - Inversion of divinity / Lack- 1. Your senses cannot tell you the truth
2. God's idea of justice is revenge
3. "God's ways are higher than ours."
4. Altruism vs. compassion
- 1, "Just ignore it."
2. We live in an abundant universe, yet we are the ones that don't see it.
1. Your senses cannot tell you the truth.
So God’s love is to give us senses that can’t tell us anything that is true. Apparently, a true world, the noumenal/spirit determines how things are seen and as such the physical is an illusion.
This is true, in a sense, but at the deepest level, if everything is one, then God’s “I am” should be equal to our “I am” and the “I am” of any concepts and ideas, including “the physical”.
Therefore, the material, and the wishes of those that love material things as a way to know God are equal to the wish of a monk sitting in emptiness.
The counterargument that is often given is, “But the Buddhist monk does more work on himself.”
2. God's idea of justice is revenge.
This is in essence a subtle implication of the way martyrdom is taught by most. It’s a quick play to get your attention before you can really think (and apparently, thought (mental being) is inferior to “being” (another form of mental self-knowledge taken by you, creator as the individualized concept “Eva Braun”, or something…).
If to save humanity we need to suffer for any reason other than having literally enslaved someone else and chosen the path of giving and receiving suffering (only giving and receiving can exist), this implies that God can only help us and forgive us if he first beats us up.
Imagine the human you have had most difficulty forgiving, and imagine that to forgive them you had to beat them up first in a dark alley (the veil) before forgiving them. Standing over their dead corpse (their soul is too tired to fight back), you say, “I forgive you brother, I forgive you.”
That's not real forgiveness and service-to-others.
3. "God's ways are higher than ours."
This is even worse, it implies that God has a limitation even we don’t have. Apparently, God/unity’s nature is to be this bloodthirsty vampire that seeks evolution and control at all cost, while our default nature is love and compassion.
“We wish God didn’t have to receive human and even child sacrifices every day, but sadly, God’s ways are higher than ours brother.”
This is the darkest belief you can hold, and it is actually service-to-self.
It is a satanic, or, inverted characteristic given to God. Geometrical inversion works like this: You are inside a box, and the lions are outside the box (the world).
Suddenly, you play this trick, inversion. Now, the lions/the world is inside the box, and you are outside the box. The whole world is suddenly “I”.
Ra calls the negative “the path of that which is not”, or “the path of illusion”.
This is because the negative always seeks to invert things. It has come to the conclusion that the best way to serve the universe/God is to enslave. (I know, truly a state deserving of compassion.)
All negativity, except the original rebellion towards it is a form of the darkness tricking us to, shall we say, “sign away our free will on a piece of paper”.
As Ra notes,
83.12 Questioner: Then you say that there are no cases where those who are service-to-others oriented are using in any way techniques of enslavement that have grown as a result of the evolution of our social structures? Is this what you mean?
Ra: I am Ra. It was our understanding that your query concerned conditions before the veiling. There was no unconscious slavery, as you call this condition, at that period. At the present space/time the condition of well-meant and unintentional slavery are so numerous that it beggars our ability to enumerate them.
Ra never said “It is not spiritual to try and change the world outside.”
If God is everything, and we are the creator, isn’t the best way to know ourselves on the positive path to know abundance?
Abundance of wealth, abundance of emptiness, abundance of compassion. These are all equal and valid forms of abundance.
God would not, I believe, give us a car and not allow us to drive it.
Indeed, to circle around, God’s idea of perfect and divine justice may involve sacrifice, but it is not because God needs sacrifices.
Because we do not know God, we kill God. We kill abundance. We kill the world God made, where all perspectives are equal views of a sphere, and where all children may return to the core.
We, of ego on Earth, kill God and then blame God for doing it/needing it.
4. Altruism vs. compassion
Our altruism justifies the sacrifice of God’s children.
God’s children are not for sale, yet altruism says: “You can tolerate a little bit more.”
It does not say: “You can choose to suffer more, because it can help the world. But, if you really need it, you can get out.”
I do not judge this idea since we all have the potential for it, but I want us to look at it from a new angle, that being polarity.
The way to end the cycle of suffering for humanity permanently is to shift the primary choice/duality from love/fear to love/wisdom.
Until then, we will always have times of dictatorship and times of peace equally. That’s just the balance required for a true choice.
This true choice, by the way, happens much more safely apparently on other planets, where the veil is, according to Q’uo, much less dense than on Earth, which is an experiment to allow continued safe development for entities that created great mayhem on their home planet. See the thread The Time Lateral
Part 2 - Why does this matter?
I also often project these beliefs out, and it is probable that I too have not seen parts of myself yet. Treat this thread as a thread for healing this belief, rather than someone giving the answer. The answer will always be inside, because God created itself as the divine idea that you are.
This idea is infinitely abundant in love, emptiness and more in various of it’s potentials. If the creator is infinite, you too are infinite to as high an extent as entropy allows.
To look at the previous example of the time lateral, the confederation gives us a beautiful chance, and we subtly assume the universe is bad and evil by nature, and project that unto our dear friends… I sometimes, apparently, do that.
1. "Just ignore it."
Something I used to do in these situations is say: “It’s ego’s fault! I am pure spirit!”
Here’s what Ra might say about this:
25.6 Questioner: Could you amplify the meaning of what you said by “failure to accept that which is given?”
Ra: I am Ra. At the level of time/space at which this takes place in the form of what you may call thought-war, the most accepting and loving energy would be to so love those who wished to manipulate that those entities were surrounded, engulfed, and transformed by positive energies.
This, however, being a battle of equals, the Confederation is aware that it cannot, on equal footing, allow itself to be manipulated in order to remain purely positive, for then though pure it would not be of any consequence, having been placed by the so-called powers of darkness under the heel, as you may say.
It is thus that those who deal with this thought-war must be defensive rather than accepting in order to preserve their usefulness in service to others. Thusly, they cannot accept fully what the Orion Confederation wishes to give, that being enslavement. Thusly, some polarity is lost due to this friction and both sides, if you will, must then regroup.
It has not been fruitful for either side. The only consequence which has been helpful is a balancing of the energies available to this planet so that these energies have less necessity to be balanced in this space/time, thus lessening the chances of planetary annihilation.
2. We live in an abundant universe, yet we are the ones that don't see it.
What is an abundant and loving creator if no creation of it’s knows that love?
Another word for “control” when it harms no Self as other-self is “expression”, or perhaps “being something other than complete fusion, oneness”.
Oftentimes the nouns we use on the spiritual journey that we think are clear and deep, turn out to be shallow. Then, it is not our fault that we did not know. We have an opportunity to contemplate abundance in a concept that better suits our desired choices - or, polarity - and accept this.
Indeed, even the 6th density service-to-self entity eventually accepts unity.
36.15 Questioner: Well, then let’s say that when Himmler, for instance, reaches sixth-density negative at the beginnings of sixth-density negative, at this time would it be [the] case that an entity would realize that his higher self is sixth-density positively oriented and for that reason make the jump from negative to positive orientation?
Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. The sixth-density negative entity is extremely wise. It observes the spiritual entropy occurring due to the lack of ability to express the unity of sixth density. Thus, loving the Creator and realizing at some point that the Creator is not only self but other-self as self, this entity consciously chooses an instantaneous energy reorientation so that it may continue its evolution.
The truth is not a dream that we must get into to escape. That is what the negative’s purpose is.
The truth is in fact always there. We are the prodigal, the son that squanders his father’s inheritance yet is still forgiven and loved infinitely when he returns to his father hoping to be made at least a lowly servant.
We are the ones that are dreaming a dream so deep we have forgotten it is a dream!
We laugh at the dreams we have at night yet we are having that exact same dream, and the only way to end this dream is love.
Radical service to others and honesty are the only escape for planets such as ours.
Indeed, it is our planet, no matter from where we come, for is not all one? Am I not the poor on the street corner? Am I not the Self as self that may have not been smiled at in years, yet at last receives a smile from Self as me?
Should we not leave this place better than we found if possible?
I love humanity now thanks to giving so much to it, and the way I love the favorite things I have seen while here I aim to love everyone when I become aware it is possible.
Can you pray for not only those you like, but those you dislike?
Can you pray for your desired world every day, and bring it forth?
Can you be this true you to the world and show everyone that infinity is the truth, that there is an infinite supply of states of being?
Part 3: Is curiosity a mistake?
I often wonder if this universe was some kind of mistake God made. The one mistaken thing in a perfect universe would then be curiosity, which leads God to walk into places that are…
68.17 Questioner: I am interested in how the first distortion applies to the negatively polarized entity misplacing the mind/body/spirit complex. Why is the negatively polarized entity followed to the place of negative time/space? Why would one of us freely follow the entity?
Ra: I am Ra. The positive polarity sees love in all things. The negative polarity is clever.
To lighten the mood, I like to imagine that MBS stands for Mohammed bin Salman, the crown prince of Saudi Arabia.
Ahem, we are fools. I mean, I don’t know much Tarot, but I know for sure that I relate to that one archetype.
Should we put compassion for suffering as a first principle, while leaving behind compassion for the archetype idea curiosity in the process?
I know, this is a paradox. Paradoxes are what Ra is supposed to be solving, not us in 3D. I am indeed a fool…
This is why, at least until 7D or late 6D, it appears we are not going to know "What did he mean by that?"
Indeed, what did our lovely creator mean with all of this?
28.16 Questioner: Are you saying then there are an infinite number of octaves of densities one through eight?
Ra: I am Ra. We wish to establish that we are truly humble messengers of the Law of One. We can speak to you of our experiences and our understandings and teach/learn in limited ways. However, we cannot speak in firm knowledge of all the creations. We know only that they are infinite. We assume an infinite number of octaves.
However, it has been impressed upon us by our own teachers that there is a mystery-clad unity of creation in which all consciousness periodically coalesces and again begins. Thus we can only say we assume an infinite progression though we understand it to be cyclical in nature and, as we have said, clad in mystery.
I only wish to note here the interpretation of there being infinite octaves seems to point to the matter of abundance being the truth in higher densities, and leave this, and all that is said here to your pondering.
“I”/our friends have actually answered my own question with this final part right as I wrote this. You could say I am channeling self-advice to my insane Self as self.
Control is not necessary for creation to exist in any form.