This strange moment from the Ra materials has been troubling me for a long time. I am asking this peculiar question because I see a contradiction between two sources.
First, there are the words of Ra from this fragment:
17.19Questioner: How did Jesus learn this during his incarnation?
Ra: I am Ra. This entity learned the ability by a natural kind of remembering at a very young age. Unfortunately, this entity first discovered his ability to penetrate intelligent infinity by becoming the distortion you call “angry” at a playmate. This entity was touched by the entity known as Jesus to you and was fatally wounded.
Thus the one known as Jesus became aware that there dwelt in him a terrible potential. This entity determined to discover how to use this energy for the good, not for the negative. This entity was extremely positively polarized and remembered more than most Wanderers do.
Which indirectly confirm that Jesus was involved in a death.
At the same time, there is The Urantia Book, famous for its detailed description of Jesus’s life (more detailed than anywhere else), and it does not say a single word about such an incident. Moreover, The Urantia Book rejects the idea that Jesus was a bad child; on the contrary, it states he was kind and never angry. Document 123 talks about his early childhood, describing how he indeed played games with his neighbors, but nowhere does it mention this unfortunate accident.
Furthermore, there is the Infancy Gospel of Thomas, which says the exact opposite about Jesus—that he could supposedly get angry easily and allegedly cursed a boy who bumped into his shoulder.
For me, it is a mystery why some see and describe the image of Jesus as pure, while others see him with flaws. So, where is the truth?
1 in a way determined by fate
2 in a manner suggesting fate or an act of fate: such as
2a in a manner resulting in death: fatally wounded
2b beyond repair
2c in a manner resulting in ruin or evil
2d in a manner that cannot be easily resisted
Also I think that the passive voice is used to decrease intention, activity and consciousness of action
I agree with this definition that it was not intentional and was indeed an act of “fate”, and that the entity that was fatally wounded most likely planned it with Jesus prior to their incarnation as the catalyst for Jesus’ awakening.
i believe in almost all of TLOO, but i believe fully in URANTIA; some things are better in Urantia than in the Law, and the Law is certainly better in other topics than Urantia.
this is one passage that i dont understand in the Law on JESUS, and i also reject it; and i know Urantia is the perfect best source on JESUS.
so as you know (maybe), Ra supports Lucifer, and Urantia is almost fully against him, so for me Ra is Caligastia the Devil, who joined the Lucifer Rebellion…
For me personally, no matter how much I read Ra, I am amazed by the level of their understanding, that is, it seems to me that they are on no one’s side, and that is why they are on the side of God.
"77.17Questioner: Now, would it be possible for this work of our density to be performed if all of the sub-Logoi chose the same polarity in any particular expression or evolution of a Logos? Let us make the assumption that our sun created nothing but, through the first distortion, there was no product except positive polarity. Would work then be done in fourth density and higher as a function only of this positive polarization evolving from our original creation of sub-Logos?
Ra: I am Ra. Elements of this query illustrate the reason I was unable to answer your previous question without knowledge of the Logos involved. To turn to your question, there were Logoi which chose to set the plan for the activation of mind/body/spirit complexes through each true-color body without recourse to the prior application of free will. It is, to our knowledge, only in an absence of free will that the conditions of which you speak obtain. In such a procession of densities you find an extraordinarily long, as you measure time, third density; likewise, fourth density. Then, as the entities begin to see the Creator, there is a very rapid, as you measure time, procession towards the eighth density. This is due to the fact that one who knows not, cares not.
Let us illustrate by observing the relative harmony and unchanging quality of existence in one of your, as you call it, primitive tribes. The entities have the concepts of lawful and taboo, but the law is inexorable and all events occur as predestined. There is no concept of right and wrong, good or bad. It is a culture in monochrome. In this context you may see the one you call Lucifer as the true light-bringer in that the knowledge of good and evil both precipitated the mind/body/spirits of this Logos from the Edenic conditions of constant contentment but also provided the impetus to move, to work and to learn."
From my understanding, that word or “thought-complex” was communicated due to our own societal complex of a concept of free will. i.e a thoughtless bliss and becoming to awareness.
