Ra also distinguish one density from another one, or at least they have to go into explanations for third density beings. But the explanation itself is discrepant, again to my opinion.
I think we have to remember something Ra says throughout, which is that our ability to understand is limited by the language we use, which is ‘linear’ and finite. I think you’re right to notice the discordance in stating ‘All is One’ while also acknowledging that the LL research group is uniquely able to communicate with Ra, minimizing the distortion of the message due to the uniquely positive orientation. To state both is to state there is no difference and there is a difference at the same time. It’s like trying to embed a Klein bottle in 3 dimensions without crossing, it’s impossible by the nature of meaning itself… To speak just one word is to zero in on something distinct from other things. Language tries to carve and individuate meaning SEPARATE from the rest of all that is (so does math), so to try and ‘square the circle’ of truly understanding that All is One, using finite linear language, is impossible. I think the resolution lies in the fact that language is somehow flawed in its inception, and that we are like children trying to learn how to reason with finite blocks about Infinity itself. The resolution is in ‘sitting with the tension’ (as claude likes to say lol). To sit in it humbly as you learn and understand over eons (whatever time means). I think we are here to experience that discordance and see the ‘resolution’ in all its infinite complexity, as we advance through these states of spiritual/philosophical/everything understanding.
So, when Ra states something like “Specifically those who are strong, intelligent, etc., have a temptation to feel different from those who are less intelligent and less strong”, I think we have to try and not dwell on the individual words like ‘different’ (like one instrument in a song), but rather on the whole meaning, the ‘theme’ it points to in context of all the other lessons which resonated with you genuinely. I take it to mean we are here to understand something TRULY GRAND AND INFINITE, like the kind of infinite that mathematicians have failed to capture with finite symbolic language (logic). The ones that are stronger in THIS particular ‘instance’ can ‘temporarily’ focus on a tiny finite piece and miss the ‘whole infinite picture’ as they marvel inward, they lack a balance and ‘only have light inside’, and so justify worse and worse treatment of other selves. They (Orion) advances to a point (far above humans now, via manipulation and enslavement) but dissolves from entropy at a high enough level, when the confusion about the Law of One is cleared (which they say is quite difficult, I take that as akin to ‘hell’). The same happens for STO but it is ‘easier’. At least for me the point is to not feel ‘fundamentally different’ and use love (the second primal distortion) to balance your free will (the first distortion) toward STO, to realize the same magic of awareness driving you drives the squirrels, the cats, people in America, in Iran, in China, the ‘crusaders’ in Orion, Ra, etc etc, it’s all just different ‘stages’ of the same Infinity. The underlying logical tension is not solvable for us here, I think.
Personally, I’m ok with this, I think there’s enormous clues to this in logic itself. For example, the Incompleteness Theorems of Kurt Godel, if those don’t make you humble about what can be known, I dunno what does. I hope you don’t mind long responses!
