Strange things happen

That’s a really nice story, that reminds me at some session protocols from Dolores Cannon.
So I am asking me if this could be a vision or recognition of a past life on another planet?

Can you say why you got the feeling that this “scenery” was STS?

This was indeed a very peculiar incident.
Specially it was an physical appearance that could be confirmed by others.

I must think at the Dementors in Askaban from Harry Potter.
This differs salient from harvesting Loosh by negative entities.

I can “only” say that there is an increasing harvest of Loosh and that there are more attacks by negative entities.
Additional the effect of seeing something in the corner of the eye has increased and has been confirmed by others too.
Heavy attacks in dreams can occur, trying to occupy your body.

Yes - it was already increased some years before, but before I would say it was a factor of 2 and not 3.

There was a description in Dolores about a species providing the development on earth, that is upgrading the DNA of certain individuals to 12 DNA strands (hopefully remembering correct).

Yes - that’s exactly.
I remember a case driving a car with the same result.

Additional there are pieces of time where you synchronise and time is the same or maybe slower than “normal”.

I started reading Michael Newton. I am only at the beginning and it is very intimate what he is writing.
In difference to Dolores he is writing from a more analytical view, showing the people the existance of time/space.

Yellow scenery, orange hair, a black tight jumpsuit with gloves, and the display of a “black star” in the sky. I quickly associated this with warm colors, which are linked to negative polarity. In the channelings, Ra mentioned that, in this context, STS corresponds to red, orange, yellow, and black, while STO corresponds to green, blue, indigo, purple, and white.

Additionally, this character exhibited a strong sense of self-admiration and self-satisfaction, as if he were saying, “Look at me,” “I’m amazing,” “I have so much,” “I can do so much.” There was nothing overtly terrible about it, but it was possible to sense his character. There was such audacity in him.

That said, the nature of this experience wasn’t clearly defined, and I didn’t have a 100% certainty about what it was. I, personally, concluded that I had encountered an 4D STS entity. However, the truth is that it could have been a memory, an alternate reality, or even a dream and my fantasy through which I was processing something internally. I explored this further, using tools like a pendulum to seek answers, gazing into a mirror into an eye (as eyes are said to be the mirror of the soul), and meditating. Each time, something emerged, but it was connected to something totally different, not to that orange - hair guy.

So, it probably wasn’t me or a past incarnation, but rather some form of external manipulation—perhaps an attempt to extract my consciousness and transport it to the 4th density where some of my experiences happened. In the end, that’s how I interpreted it, but I still don’t know for sure what it truly was.

It actually happened quite a few years ago. I called my father and told him, “Some nutcase is following me.” Well, I wasn’t going to tell him that some alien being or a demon—was after me. I just wanted to get his attention.

For about a dozen seconds, my father watched the figure, and then it left. We talked for a bit, speculating that maybe the person thought I was alone and wanted to rob me. Sure, you can rationalize it in many ways, but deep down, I knew there was more to it.

At the time, my father had been tinkering with something, playing with a small soldering iron. As soon as the figure disappeared, he just went right back to what he was doing—almost burning a hole in his finger in the process. Neither of us could fully admit what we had just seen or the effect it had on us. We both sensed that it was something out of the ordinary, but we suppressed it somewhere, even though it hit us emotionally.

Generally, I didn’t talk much with my father about it—or about my interest in spirituality, aliens, and things like that. Unfortunately, I still can’t do it fully openely, since he’s not particularly interested… but never mind.

The energy you involuntarily felt at that moment was deeply unsettling. It was as if your own mental resources were being drained—making it easy to lose focus, get confused, feel nauseous, or forget things. That’s how it felt. I imagined that if someone is mentally weak, they are automatically put under this burden and it consumes them.

As if consciousness is consumed if one does not respond, for example, by emphasizing one’s own (consciousness) in a positive way, I am not even talking about expressing oneself in an open way, for example, with words, but rather through the internal management of one’s psyche.

This has happened to me some time ago. And I wouldn’t be honest if I pretended otherwise that there’s not a deeper context to these events. At the time, I was in a phase where I desperately wanted to understand who the alien beings were—from other densities or dimensions—especially the positive ones. I wanted confirmation, almost obsessively. I thought about it constantly, imagined it, and fixated on the idea.

Back then, there were far more UFO sightings and various videos circulating online. I seriously considered getting involved in UFO research, particularly in exposing negative alien activities. I wanted to connect these UFO events with the idea that they influence and program people, shaping our behavior and our lives. I wanted to spread that message.

At that point, I wasn’t so focused on developing in a positive polarity (however, I understand these things to some extent and valued them)—but rather I was simply preoccupied with proving that UFOs exist and beings from other density/dimensions.

Then, I also had experiences that, in my view, suggested I had encountered positive 4D STO beings no only 4D STS one. And I’m talking about a physical experience, not energetically, not any walk-in, not wanderer, I am talking about 4D STO being not human born on this planet. And it happened around the same time with the meeting of this negative entity we’ve been discussing. It all made sense to me finally—it felt as if they had responded to my curiosity. Both the negative and positive sides took this opportunity to give me some piece of experience so that I could get to know them, even a little.

And those negative ones even seemed not only acknowledge it, but know my tendency and plans I want to manifest in my life, as if saying, “Yes, we are real. Your intuitions are correct. But we really don’t like what you’re trying to do. We breathe down your neck and can be unpleasant if we needed.”

The intrusion of this negative entity, exactly, felt for me like stalking and intimidation. It shook me up and made me realize that all of this was much closer to reality than I had assumed. It also made me understand the importance of taking personal development seriously.

I still believe this today. It’s not that I’m promoting an overly concerned or rigid mindset, but one must recognize the importance of being confident, disciplined, and reliable—even for oneself, for the self. Because these things are happening, and the kind of information shared like here (on LLR) is incredibly powerful when applied and willed to understand.

1 Like

Strange things happen, when normal things get strange.

The own village is still in the Rhineland region and therefore the carnival is very active.
Every year it’s always interesting to see how it develops and what kind of spirit prevails.
This year it was definitely better than last year, the group spirit was more cheerful and exuberant and it was terribly loud.

However, this time it was suddenly very repellent in my own perception, because I became aware that it all has a very military feel and is therefore just a continuation of the omnipresent programming.
A parade was staged, groups calling themselves for example “Turmsoldaten” (tower soldiers) wearing military insignia, much marching to the beat of music and everything was organized down to the last detail.
Not to mention two wagons from the hunting party.

Conclusion: Merely calendar-organized and prescribed fun with mind influencing.

After this experience there had to be a short round on a lonely forest path to recover.

O.K. Ra mentioned this kind of attribution of colors. This is not wrong and can be found in this physical projection.
Nevertheless your description does not evoke such associations for me.

This is much more convincing for me. :+1:

I cannot say why, but it is hard for me to imagine a 4D STS density, because Ra has defined it as a density of love.
Even if you leave out love, the definition would be that the vibration increases, but in oppression, obedience and violence, an increase of vibration is not possible.

Then I would say it makes more sense to earch in another direction.

External manipulation takes place in really many forms here, one of it is influencing the brain with radio radiation. This can be felt often very intensive in dreams.

Someone did tell me a similar story not long ago.
She said that after reflecting the incident, it was a check of the negative entities.

This is at least a good description what has happened and you simply know it was a negative influence.

That’s what i often feel at the weekend, when the mindcontrol with radio emissions is turned to maximum of the week.

That’s of course something complete different.
It’s hard to say, but this also happens subliminally from time to time again. You could simply say that we are exposed to attacks at all levels.

Very interesting.

That’s the way of STS / negative entities reacting.
And you can realize it in a mundane way from the government.

1 Like

Yes, unfortunately, spiritual teachings provide us with many different contradictions. However, from my experience, I see that eventually, an integrated picture emerges from these various fragmented descriptions and reasonings. To clarify the situation, it can be explained in the following way, as I will attempt to do below. However, it is important to note that this is still just one approach and way of reasoning.

Well, Confederation said, amoing others, that STS is love only for the self. An STS individual constricts everything so that all serves only them, without expressing anything outward to support others unless it aligns with their own interests. The 4D STS level is where they achieve certain mastery in loving self (at least 95% negative polarization) after the 3D experience. After that, there is no longer the possibility of Choice—they must, under pressure, absorb negative energy to sustain themselves. In their love for the self, they begin to cause suffering to others from lower densities to stay alive.

Thus, the “Density of Love” in STS is understood as love solely for the self, not for others. For those who are positively polarized, the “Density of Love” begins with the idea that you love others no less than yourself, and you cannot feed off those from lower densities. This is the moment when you truly start to open yourself to the love and light of the Creator, which lifts you with its infinite potential. The more love and light you give to others, the more you can proportionally feel the energetic support from the Creator—support that you are capable of bearing, reflecting in being capable to give without expecting anything in return—allowing you to ascend in your advancement regarding your level of positive polarization.

Thanks for your deliberations but sorry - I cannot realise anything that has to do with love in it.
So “mastery in loving self” sounds for me like Narcissism and not Love.

Narcissism is a self-centered personality style characterized as having an excessive preoccupation with oneself and one’s own needs, often at the expense of others.

Narcissism is characterized as disorder too.

For me the heritage of the Vedas is straight and logical. There is only one clear direction in the lokas the self can go.

This is the key point: information must always be interpreted in relation to its context.

In a reality founded on unity—where there is only One Truth, and Oneness encompasses everything—it becomes impossible to discuss various aspects of this Oneness without losing its absolute nature. Since we are perceiving “from below,” we can only ever see and interpret fragments, never the whole at once, and our reasoning is always shaped by the context we are operating within. The truth emerges through the integration of these partial interpretations, continuously elevating them to a higher level—until, ultimately, we arrive at Oneness itself.

At this lower level of understanding, love first appears as “smaller” truths—each valid only within its appropriate assumptions and context. As our comprehension deepens and becomes more integrated, these partial truths are revealed in their fuller meaning. Conversely, when we engage with a more integrated, conscious source, it already holds this higher-level understanding, requiring us to break it down into parts to make it accessible at our current level.

This is how love can be perceived in two distinct contexts:

  1. Love as the energy of unconditional love, infused with the intelligence of the Creator.
  2. Love as support, care, and the skillful direction and management of energy.

While other definitions could certainly be considered, let’s focus on these two. When discussing love in the context of the “Density of Love,” we can say that for Service to Others, definition #1 applies, whereas for Service to Self, definition #2 is more relevant.

When speaking in the context of narcissism and psychology, love is generally not discussed at all, as narcissism is a disorder. However, from the Confederation’s perspective, this would align with love in the sense of definition #2, but not #1.

I understand that your confusion likely stems from personal interpretations of different words and the subjective meanings we naturally assign to them. This is entirely understandable—everyone functions this way, including myself. However, I suspect that if you approach it from the right perspective, everything will become simple and self-evident.

Yes - and it is interpreted to the individual knowledge and worldview.
I have found that different perspectives and worldviews can exist side by side and the results of the different views can be very inspiring.

That’s the point: From the Confederation’s perspective STS / Asuras must somehow be integrated into a density that will focus on love.

It is not seen as confusion, it is (already) seen from the worldview of the Vedas and KISS (Keep It Simply & Stupid). :grinning_face:
All deliverances agree about the importance of free will and it is simply the individual choice to follow the light of the one creator and his love or to reject it. This also does not contradict a view of all is one.
There is no necessity to project love into negative entities and their lokas / densities.

From what I am familiar with regarding the Confederation material, the moment STS completes its lessons in the 5th density and arrives at the 6th density, it finds itself in a situation where it either returns to lower densities as an STS wanderer, gets stuck in endless cycles at the 6th density, or—depending on the context—there are two correct answers:

  • 6D STS begins working on balancing wisdom with love in order to eventually ascend to the 7th density.
  • 6D STS begins working on opening the Heart, shifting from releasing love exclusively for itself to embracing love for the whole, for others, while still maintaining self-love as an element contributing to greater unity. This, too, is ultimately in order to ascend to the 7th density.

I learned this principle while studying computer programming. It’s a valuable principle in computer science because code should be written so simply that even a 12-year-old can understand it. Anyone who fails to grasp this doesn’t understand the art of coding. Striving for the greatest simplicity is optimal.

However, in matters of spirituality and philosophy, this principle doesn’t necessarily apply. Here, slightly different rules come into play. Simplicity is often replaced by depth, where nothing is entirely simple or fully known. The word ‘Love’—or ‘love’ with a lowercase ‘l’—encompasses a whole spectrum of meanings, leading to various associations and interpretations. Let’s keep in mind—now I’m paraphrasing, but perhaps it’s also a direct quote—‘There is only One, and that One is Love.’

How do we understand this? ‘One’ is often explained, for example, as ‘Infinity,’ which would mean we have Infinite Love—so does that mean everything is Infinite Love? What does that imply? And so on, and so on…

For instance, in the world of ancient ideas in Platonism and Neoplatonism, we find:

  • In Plato’s philosophy, Eros (equivalent for love) is the desire for beauty and goodness, which begins with sensual love but ultimately guides the soul toward the knowledge of the Forms and, finally, the Form of the Good.
  • In Plotinus’ philosophy, Eros (love) is a spiritual force that drives the soul to return to the One, serving as a means of mystical ascent and union with the absolute.

This opens new doors for meaning of love and is not simple at all :slight_smile:

But anyway, I think we understand each other pretty well, and I’ve conveyed what I wanted to say. So for now, I’ll step back—see you next time for more reflections and discussions! :slight_smile:

Or another answer or maybe three answers or more, because this is a multidimensional construct.

Why do you think that everythink that Ra has teached must be correct?

Please tell this C++ or Perl programmers. :rofl:

Yes - of course. I read a text from Krishnamurti and he is scrutinise the meaning of the word very hard.

I would say I am not able to define the word correct, but I am sure that negative entities are not willing to accomplish love in any meaning.

Yes - I am grateful because nobody else want to touch this theme.

If I understand correctly, my statement does not imply that there are only two possible answers; it simply states that there are at least two correct answers. :wink: And I’m suggesting throughout the sentence that other contexts might allow for different correct answers.

I never stated it that way.

Unfortunately, your wording has become a rhetorical device that presupposes I’m a 100% believer in Ra’s infallibility, which could be seen as an attempt to subtly discredit me or compel me to justify my belief.

I apply Ra’s knowledge freely, guided by what resonates with me, and I have no need to prove anything to myself or anyone else—just as I see no need to prove that water in a pool or the ability to swim actually exists before I swim and enjoy the experience.

That’s correct. :+1:

Please forgive me, your very detailed explanations based on Ra’s world view had given the impression that this is decisive for you. Now I know that this was just an detailed interpretation of the Ra material.

Everything is O.K., because I simply stated that this particular STS view of Ra for higher densities does not resonate with me.
There is much of Ra that still resonates, but this makes no logical sense and cannot be observed in this physical reality.

2 Likes