Session 57 (57.22 & 57.23)

Strictly Law of One
1

Hello friends,

I struggle to make sence of the following:

57.22 Questioner: What should that proportion be?

Ra: I am Ra. This proportion should be the 1.16 which you may observe.

57.23 Questioner: Do you mean that the sum of the four base sides should be 1.16 of the height of the pyramid?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

I am working on a project based on pyramids, but I am not so good in math. Is there anyone that can shed some light on how this proportion could be translated into a slant (slope) angle?
On another website I read that the angle would translate to a slope angle of 81.72 degrees, I cannot get to the same results, so I hope that someone better with math could explain this a bit further. Any help would be much appreciated. My own results come to a 73.83Ā° slope angleā€¦ so I believe Iā€™m doing something wrong.

57.22 & 57.23

Love David

2

Here is a nice article (german) about it.

792Ɨ252 24.4 KB

formula

This should be an angle of 51.854 degree for the sides. (calculator)


Another theory is that the pyramid was built with the width-height ratio of 440 / 280 royal cubits. This can be reduced to 11 / 7.

So it can be assumed that Ra did mean 1.6 instead of 1.16

1 Like
3

Thanks! Iā€™m looking for more info however about specifically ā€˜the sum of the four base to be 1.16 of the heightā€™. The mathematical 51.854 degree is for the Great Pyramid (51.827 according to Phi). The 1.16 ratio would be a very steep angleā€¦ much like the Nubian or Russian Pyramidā€¦ Is that 81.72? I cannot get the same results.

4

The nubian pyramids seems to differ between 68 to 72 degrees.

5

If Ra meant 1.6, it would make a lot of sence, as Phi is 1.618 and that corresponds with the slant angle of the great pyramid, but they were not talking about the great pyramid in this specific session. Thatā€™s what confuses me.

6

At least Don asks for this value and maybe Ra did not ā€œlistenā€ correct. :smiley:

7

I do not believe that, but it is possible ^^

The slant angle of the russian pyramid (76.345) is also mentioned in the Ra materialā€¦ But this 1.16 ratio is rare and very specific to this Session, I do not believe this is an errorā€¦ I would like to see what slant angle this would give =) Do you or anyone know if that is 81.72? I can not get the same results

8

Hmm - reading the sentence correct

the four base sides should be 1.16 of the height of the pyramid

would mean as formula
4 * a = 1.16 * h

Then h = 3.558 * a
That would be very spiky.

Or read it as each side should be 1.16 of the height?

a = 1.16 * h

That would result into 59.88 degree. Not so spiky like the nubian pyramids.

1 Like
9

Thanks! Very spiky isnā€™t it?! :slightly_smiling_face: :slightly_smiling_face:
Thatā€™s why I find this so interestingā€¦

10

Thanks for your thoughts, very much appreciated!

According to Precision Pyramids: If is the height of the pyramid is 1, then the sum of the four base sides is 1.16, which translates to a slope angle of 81.72 degrees.

11

At least I think the goal is to reach the golden ratio.

ratio

1 Like
12

Exactly! :boom:

13

It seems I was overcomplicating things, if we literally use that 1.16 ratio the 81.75Ā° aprox angle is indeed the outcomeā€¦ Just like Precision Pyramids mentions. So spiky, strangeā€¦

14

Hello, has anyone figured this out?
Or has anyone tried the suggested form of healing?

1 Like
15

I think thereā€™s numerous pyramid sites found around the world. The age of these may transcend mankindā€™s historical records. Ra as 2.7billion years old, may
remember, because it may be fairly recent in that
time span.

Apparently the pyramid structures around the
world were planet balancing features used to
ā€œhealā€ the planet, so to speak - to itā€™s current
form of relative stability. Itā€™s not hard to envision
cataclysms, like the formation of the moon that
may have been like a wound to a planet.

Thereā€™s some notion that these ancient structures
were once healing sites that would revitalize
people, but because they were neglected, they
fell out of tune in that capacity. The mechanism
no matter the size, is to act as a scoop of Gaia
energy trajectories having spiral geometry.

Apparently thereā€™s energy concentrated
sites within and above the pyramid. So putting
a small pyramid under your pillow and resting
your head over it, might activate the indigo
center which likely corresponds to the pineal
gland. Within that gland can form Corpora
Arenacea, aka brain sand. These are actual
crystals that form which, in my observation -
accelerates development of the physical
counterpart of the spiritual shuttle, indigo!

If this is new to you, it is not necessarily
a fast progression or comfortable. There
can be cramps at the brain stem and
experiences of popping can occur that
indicate progress. These Popā€™s, like
cracking a joint, to me correspond to the
Sahaswara chakra, the thousand petal
lotus. You may experience a thousand
pops before it is totally blossomed.

Ra warns that this is not for everyone,
and itā€™s important to sustain hemispherical
balance in the development. Alternate
nostril breathing, alternating tetrahedron
visualizations, heart chakra orchestration
all help. Neglecting balance, people can
physically develop an innate head tilt
which can indicate their balance. For
example, heavy astrologers can be
tilted to the right, indicating left brain
logic, fortune telling psychics may be
leaning to left as bore right brained.

Short of having a physical pyramid to
find healing from, Ra recommends
finding a crystallized healer who can
help you heal yourself. Thereā€™s many
many available, increasing in numbers
as the population expands.

1 Like
16

Hi @Pipena . I have not found a solution for this just yet that works for me. I found an article Article: ([https://aoteara.com/diy-pyramid-proportions/]). that was indeed interesting, but it is still unclear to me what the 1.16 ratio really means as there are many interpretations of the ā€œthe sum of the four base sides should be 1.16 of the height of the pyramidā€ matter. Many different interpretations are out thereā€¦

The outcome of the 1.16 ratio being the 81.75Ā° slant angle is still something I struggle to interpret differently, there must be a ā€˜goldenā€™ solution and/or link out there, still trying to find one satisfying explanation that answers these questions. I work a lot with sacred geometry and I am pretty sure that the answer is hidden in a template/blueprint. I made this golden circle template (and more) for example of golden relations in various pyramid blueprints.

Cheers, David

gld_tmplt_itp
gld_tmplt_itp800Ɨ800 244 KB

17

Sometimes these things are iteratively
developed to optimize functionality;
that is, they try something and then
tweak a variable to optimize.

Ra seems to hold an affinity for
alignment, and variables that relate,
like compass orientation and latitude
and longitude may factor.

Also, trying to understand a three
dimensional geometry with two
dimensional projections can be
confusing, but few people are
able to visualize in things as used
in mechanical CAD programs.
(The spiraling earth energies seem
more helical than flat spirals.)

When I was pondering pyramids
decades ago, I considered church
steeples, and A-frame cabin lofts
sharing similarity. Experientially
one could try hanging out in these
constructs to possible sense some
vibrational difference.

Another thing I pondered was the
idea that a good luck pyramid was
a portion of a tesseract that may
partially reside in some unseen
dimension - another structure, the
obelisk might be a portion of a
vertically stretched tesseract.

Lastly, I remember pillow pyramids
made of clear crystal can lend an
effect of Crystal caffeine, whereas
Smokey quartz was less caffeinated,
as are citrine, amethyst, etc. Darker
stones such as black tourmaline or
shungite can be helpfully grounding,
though I havenā€™t found the same for
obsidians. (The obsidians can lend
a strange obsessive sense I donā€™t
totally understand.)

1 Like