Law of One - Session 37 Discussion

Feeling inspired, Session 37 of the Law of One was placed in my view for perusing. Please read the session and questions that came to mind will be added at the end:

Ra
I am Ra. I greet you in the love and in the light of the One Infinite Creator. I communicate now.

Questioner
Is Ra familiar with the results of our efforts today to publish the first book that we did?

Ra
I am Ra. This is correct.

Questioner
I don’t know if you can comment on the difficulty we will have in making the Law of One available to those who would require it and want it. It is not something that is easy to disseminate to those who want it at this time. I am sure there are many, especially the wanderers, who want this information, but we will have to do something else in order to get it into their hands in the way of added material, I am afraid.

Is it possible for you to comment on this?

Ra
I am Ra. It is possible.

Questioner
Will you comment on it?

Ra
I am Ra. We shall.

Firstly, the choosing of this group to do some work to serve others was of an intensive nature. Each present sacrificed much for no tangible result. Each may search its heart for the type of sacrifice, knowing that the material sacrifices are the least; the intensive commitment to blending into an harmonious group at the apex of sacrifice.

Under these conditions we found your vibration. We observed your vibration. It will not be seen often. We do not wish to puff up the pride, but we shall not chaffer (Note: Definition of chaffer: to haggle) with the circumstances necessary for our particular contact. Thus you have received, and we willingly undertake, the honor/duty of continuing to offer transmissions of concepts which are, to the best of our abilities, precise in nature and grounded in the attempt to unify many of those things that concern you.

Secondly, the use you make of these transmissions is completely at your discretion. We suggest the flowing of the natural intuitive senses and a minimum of the distortion towards concern. We are content, as we have said, to be able to aid in the evolution of one of your peoples. Whatever efforts you make cannot disappoint us, for that number already exceeds one.

Questioner
I have been very hesitant to ask certain questions for fear that they would be regarded, as I regard them, as questions of unimportance or too great a specificity and, thereby, reduce our contact with you. In order to disseminate some of the information that I consider to be of extreme importance—that is, the non-transient type of information, information having to do with the evolution of mind, body, and spirit—it seems almost necessary, in our society, to include information that is of little value, simply because that’s how our… our society works and how the system of distribution appraises that which is offered for distribution. Could you comm— Will… will you comment on this problem that I have?

Ra
I am Ra. We comment as follows: It is quite precisely correct that the level and purity of this contact is dependent upon the level and purity of information sought. Thusly, the continued requests for specific information, from this particular source, is deleterious to the substance of your purpose.

Moreover, as we scanned your mind to grasp your situation as regards the typescript of some of our words, we found that you had been criticized for the type of language construction used to convey data. Due to our orientation with regard to data, even the most specifically answered question would be worded by our group in such a way as to maximize the accuracy of the nuances of the answer. This, however, mitigates against what your critic desires in the way of simple, lucid prose.

More than this we cannot say. These are our observations of your situation. What you wish to do is completely your decision, and we remain at your service in whatever way we may be without breaking the Way of Confusion.

Questioner
We will attempt to work around these problems in dissemination of the Law of One. It will take some careful work to do this, but we will. I personally will not cease while still incarnate to attempt to disseminate this. I believe it will be necessary to write a book, most probably about UFOs, since the Law of One is connected with the phenomenon. It’s connected with all phenomena, but this is the… seems to be the easiest entry into dissemination.

My first plan is to, using the UFO in the advertising sense that it was meant by the Confederation, use this as an entry into an explanation of the process of evolution that has gone on on this planet, and how the rest of the… or the Confederation has been involved in a more understandable way, shall I say, for the population who will read it, using the Ra material in undistorted form just as it has been recorded here in various places through the book to amplify and clarify what we are saying in the book. This is the only way that I can see right now to create enough dissemination for the people who would like to have the Law of One for them to be able to get it. I could just go ahead and print up the material we have off the tape recorder and publish it, but we would be unable to disseminate it very well because of distribution problems.

Will you comment on my second idea of doing a general book on UFOs including the material from the Law of One?

Ra
I am Ra. We shall comment. We hope that your Ra plans materialize. This is a cosmic joke. You were asking for such an example of humor, and we feel this is a rather appropriate nexus in which one may be inserted. Continue with your intentions to the best of your natures and abilities. What more can be done, my friends?

I never listened to the Law of One recordings before. I never really had a desire to. But then I came across this Law of One session, #37 that left a lot of questions that couldn’t be answered from just reading the material alone. I wanted to get a “feel” for the material so I figured I could use my own intuition and discernment to get a “vibe” on what the actual sessions “felt” like.

Listening to the audio recording of this session, I noticed something very peculiar in the way Don asks his questions. He seems to speak at the exact same rate as “Ra” does, speaking very deliberately and specifically, using very noticeable, but rather “uncommon” speech patterns and pauses where one naturally speaking would not place a “pause”. Does anyone know why Don does this exactly? :thinking:

Strangely…It reminds me of the “old school” text-to-speech programs from back in the day, like “Dragon Naturally Speaking.” You had to train the program to get used to your specific speech pattern, and to do so would require you to speak very slowly and deliberately.

You wouldn’t just say, “Hi, my name is Ra and I am here to share my wisdom with you.”

You would have to say, “Hi… my… name is… Ra… and…I am… here… to share… my… wisdom… with… you.”

Otherwise, the “program” couldn’t pick up what you were saying and the “speech” that was generated from that program would come out confusing and jumbled.

I imagine technology has gotten much better over the years and you can use a text-to-speech that was a lot more efficient.

Firstly, the choosing of this group to do some work to serve others was of an intensive nature. Each present sacrificed much for no tangible result. Each may search its heart for the type of sacrifice, knowing that the material sacrifices are the least; the intensive commitment to blending into an harmonious group at the apex of sacrifice.

This session has Don talking about needing this information in order to write a book about UFOs. This quote, “knowing that the material sacrifices are the least” makes me wonder what “material sacrifices” they are well… sacrificing? When Ra states in this session that it is up to Don’s own discernment on what he wants to do with the book.

I could just go ahead and print up the material we have off the tape recorder and publish it, but we would be unable to disseminate it very well because of distribution problems.

He seems in a hurry to get this “material” out as soon as possible, considering it was only March 12, of 1981 and they were only “trance channeling” for less than 3 months.

I am sure there are many, especially the wanderers, who want this information, but we will have to do something else in order to get it into their hands in the way of added material, I am afraid.

How long were they aware of “wanderers” that 3 months in they were in a hurry to get it out to their distributors? Didn’t Don state himself that the information was of “extreme” importance? Why the rush?

In order to disseminate some of the information that I consider to be of extreme importance—that is, the non-transient type of information, information having to do with the evolution of mind, body, and spirit—it seems almost necessary, in our society, to include information that is of little value, simply because that’s how our… our society works and how the system of distribution appraises that which is offered for distribution.

Moreover, as we scanned your mind to grasp your situation as regards the typescript of some of our words, we found that you had been criticized for the type of language construction used to convey data.

I didn’t know what typescript was so I did a search…

I thought Ra used “words” from our language to “deliver their message. Why would they need to use a programming language?

Secondly, the use you make of these transmissions is completely at your discretion.

This reminds of strangely of an album by the band, Starset, called “Transmissions.” Starset is a band that tells a very elaborate “story” about transmission sent from a planet from the future. It’s very reminiscent of the Law of One. I read the PROX transmissions last year, that this “story” is derived from.

I’m sorry if this seems unrelated, but for some reason I think it could prove useful somehow…

https://www.reddit.com/r/Starset/comments/esb6ea/the_starset_lore_part_i_transmissions/

Here is an excerpt from Reddit that summarizes nicely what the “story” the Starset Society wants to put forward:

In New Year’s Eve 2012, a SETI astronomer called Stephen Browning received a transmission from the outern space (from the Bernard’s star). Browning managed to uncode the title of the transmission:

FECNUM: 01022047 CONTENTS: 90MB SUBJECT: IF BORDEN IS CORRECT, YOU ARE RECEIVING THIS 1.1.2013, THE YEAR WHEN [CONT IN BODY]

The body of the text was encrypted, so he turned to Aston Wise, a rich research engineer with plenty resources. They find themselves pursued by an organisation called USCOO (being his leader a man called Charles Stignum) that wants to have the contents of the transmission. Browning and Wise discover that the transmission was also found in 1979 by Browning’s professor Dr. Gregor in 1979. Another man who also found the 1979 transmission (called Edgar Thompson), helped them understand the code to decrypt the text. Browning and Wise had already deduced it came from the future (from January the 2nd of 2047). Once decrypted, they get a video.

They could see a “desolate twilight terrain from above in the deep orange, red, and pinks of an other-wordly sunset”. A man who was wearing a metallic helmet with a clear visor and a slick grey and white body suit (in brief, a space suit), started speaking:

It is January 2, 2047. A small group of men have acquired the source of an incredible power. The men controlling this power -once believed to have the potential for endless good- have used it to exploit their fellow men. I am Thomas Bell. If Mr. Borden’s modifications have been successful, you are receiving this thirty-four years ago, in the year 2013 -the time when it could have all been avoided. Please take heed of the following transmissions.

After that, a robot provided with an AI, called Quasi, starts talking and tells our protagonists that they’ve got three transmissions. The first one being “an account of the historical events that left the Earth in chaos under a totalitarian regime”. The second one, being a biographical account of the life of Thomas Bell, comprised of various sources. The last one is a series of blueprints of the technology that has caused that totalitarian regime to happen. In the book, we’re told about the first transmission, which basically tells us a brief history of the future:

In 1972, Dutch astronomer Peter De Kamp discovered a terrestrial planet orbiting Bernard’s star, called Proxy Earth or PROX. This planet doesn’t rotate, so it has one side in eternal sunlight and another one in eternal darkness. The only place which had temperatures that made life possible was at the boundaries of these two hemispheres, a region known by the name of Star Set (because from the surphace the sun appeared to be eternally setting on the horizon). After that, the US Government started a secret program called ‘The Proximity Earth Colonization Project’.

In 2021, someone invented a very small hot fusion device. This research was bought by a small group of billionaires so, in 2024, scientists got a Nearly Infinite Energy Mechanism (or NIEM). The group of billionaires set a corporation called Free Energy Corporation (or FEC). By means of speculative strategy, FEC managed to take control over the global energy market. With that huge income, they started a research that gave life, in 2035, to a device called the Everything Machine: a volumetric printer that had the ability to copy and print any three dimensional object by modifying atoms. Having the monopoly on the Everything Machines, FEC took control over the global industries too, until a jobless class reached the 80% of the population. These people were sent to the ‘Growth Zones’ which were basically concentration camps. The rest of the people were sent to cities known as ‘Forts’.

A police force called the Dept. of Civil Vigilance and Recovery (CVR), labeled as Carnivors, had the mission to squash any opposition to the FEC. Meanwhile, a resistance network began to raise, the National Freedom Alliance (NFA). Because of that, a special election on June 1st of 2035 gave the FEC control of the government. Then, they discovered the The Proximity Earth Colonization Project that had been held secret. By this time, the project had managed to build ion thrusters that could travel ad .9 light years per year. Also, giant terraformers had been sent to PROX to convert the carbon dioxide to breathable oxygen.

The civil war started by the NFA uprising finished on August 16th 2035, when the NFA waged a full-scale attack on all major FEC strongholds and bases. The offensive was successful (only FEC bases in Chicago and Washington were spared), so many powerful FEC members and their families decided to escape to PROX.

Anyways if anyone has any insights on this channeling and the questions posed above, I’d love to hear your opinions!!!

Here is what typescript means.

image

And yes it is also the name of a popular web programming language, which I use myself.

I think it is safe to assume that Ra was not referring to the programming language.

2 Likes

Patrick…your statement made me extremely curious as to where programming language first originated.

It looks like the oldest programming language still in effect is called Fortran.

Apparently those creating programming language back in the 50s started to think very highly of themselves, even attributing their works as a kind of “priesthood.”

“Just as westerners and other frontier types developed a rather chauvinistic pride in their frontiersmanship and a corresponding kind of conservatism that went with it, so many pioneering programmers in the 1950s began to regard themselves as members of a priesthood guarding skills and mysteries that were far too complex for ordinary people,” he said.

Plans to make programming accessible to large populations met “a considerable hostility and derision,” as well as skepticism of this heretical notion that “a mechanical process could do all the mysterious, inventive things they did to produce an efficient program.

“So they were really opposed to those few mad revolutionaries that wanted to make programming easy enough so that everyone could do it.”

And that was the world that Fortran confronted. Even after recognizing a need, “the resistance of the priesthood was such that the whole thing was likely to be ignored — unless you could turn the idea into a fully-developed system that would prove the practicality of the idea beyond a shadow of a doubt.”

Then I was curious as to how Fortran lead the way for other types of programming. Looks like they connect to most other types of programming language including C++.

I use this as an example. TypeScript is another form of JavaScript. The first JavaScript engine is called SpiderMonkey.

Everything is related. Everything is connected. There are no “coincidences.”

1 Like

I think you are overthinking the speech rate and break patterns thing.

The response about sacrifices is a response to the very first part of the question, the “difficulty we will have in making the Law of One available to those who would require it and want it” part. The material sacrifices can be just about anything, typically possessions. At one time Carla threw out her clothes to try to magickally fix a clothes buying addiction. But Ra implies that such sacrifices are not that important compared to some sort of inter-relationship sacrifices that I don’t really understand since I am total loner. :sweat_smile:

37.5 I think Don is presenting a hypothetical situation describing to Ra the difficulties of publishing and disseminating raw Ra transcripts. He was not interested in publishing 37 sessions. I perceive no rush in the transcripts, only a concern in certain techniques of dissemination (such as asking about questioning Ra about UFOs so the material can draw in more people). There is a concern, as with any spiritual body of text, with the transient-to-philosophical ratio. Thankfully, there is not too much exo-politics in this material.

“Typescript” does not refer to a programming language. It did not exist in 1981. It is a reference to how Don showed a typed out version of some of the transcripts to some person, and that person criticized Ra’s language. I don’t feel this is an unusual choice of words, and it has no duel meaning. Ra generally does not speak in a way that there is duel meaning or hidden references. If they do, it is quite obvious. Such as “I are Ra”.

At some point in the quest to lyric improv,
I pondered that an infinite space almost
any song might ressonate with a Ra session,
almost - it’s debatable. For example this
attempt, inspired by session 37 in jest.

I AM RA SAYS RA
(Song beat similar to David Brent,
Spaceman Came Down)

Ra had once found
a harmony three.
To transmit by sound
some answers you see.

I am Ra says Ra,
Ra answers them true.
Confusion’s okay,
and cracking jokes too.

Seven relays,
back to six, five,
four, three, two?
Who’s on first
but I don’t know’s
on third.

Ra’s time space heard
three points go round.
You and your higher self
and total bound.

Ra explains the mass
in gravity wells.
It’s spiritual class,
of words not simple.
To answer what’s asked
correctly nimble.

As higher self gift,
Ra materials dance.
In hope one uplifts,
I am Ra says Ra,
in chance creation assists.

I’m also a developer and I’m almost spitting out my coffee.

1 Like