This is a very interesting statement that synapse may be closed. I do not know biology and listening a lecture about synapses now. I listened some small others yesterday, and did not run across closing synapses.
I was pondering the idea a shaman might be
a person who’s n touch with their magical
personality. I think shamanic people might
be creative in conveying spiritual insights to
those who may be out of touch with their
magical personality. So this question may
be one that implies it’s answer - revealed or
hidden might connote a mystery of magic.
This improv was inspired by Law Of One
Session 40, read this week. The lyrics
don’t fully reveal themselves until the
song beat joins in with them, like a second
verse of a great song - one verse obvious,
and one verse concealed.
SHAMAN’S WELL-BEING
(Song beat similar to Dire Straights,
Sultans Of Swing)
I read a cycle had its start
as light is born of dark,
beyond time.
Prismatic colors
splitting to dimensions of being.
The dark is clouding wispy
somewhat sublime.
Then some light
transfigures it clearly seen.
By our feelings inside
where our energies hide in their places.
Activating and then
our challenge is found.
Harmony and balance spaces.
Our density in rays as color bound.
Rainbows spring out
Rainbows spring out
Halo crowns
Short questions of Don
get answered quite long.
We learn vibrations
some minds cannot reason well.
Unprepared some minds
will function wrong.
As consequence of choice
some distract from health.
And Carla channels fine
by Jim’s support divine.
If cancer stems from mind,
don’t let anger degrade kind.
Some choose to forgive
with care and respect.
Go on to live as healing reflects.
We are of shaman’s
We are of shaman’s well-being
People of the planet
busy upgrading vibration.
The planet heals in response
and it upgrades too.
Takes hundreds of years
to transition the groovin’ land.
Humanity grows, new from old.
And those shamans
Yeah those shamans
they were a trio
trio
We understand thoughts
become things, till most is known.
Ourselves revealed
as friends in friendly teams.
We might grow
by inner balance shown.
So tunings last within our being.
We are of shaman’s
We are of shaman’s well-being
1 Like
Interesting thank you for sharing
Thanks for sharing this session, Quan, and for your insights. I have difficulty working with the chakras and this is helpful.
1 Like
Another tip is to feel the blockages in chakra or in over-activations… just do that balancing work an sensitise yourself to where on your spine… this quote is most probably straightforward example in Law of One… so doing this and when intensifying part comes most commonly will feel in in red ray and orange ray chakra or energy centre
"Ra: The entity polarizing positively perceives the anger. This entity, if using this catalyst mentally, blesses and loves this anger in itself. It then intensifies this anger consciously in mind alone until the folly of this red-ray energy is perceived not as folly in itself but as energy subject to spiritual entropy due to the randomness of energy being used.
Positive orientation then provides the will and faith to continue this mentally intense experience of letting the anger be understood, accepted, and integrated with the mind/body/spirit complex. The other-self which is the object of anger is thus transformed into an object of acceptance, understanding, and accommodation, all being reintegrated using the great energy which anger began."
(of course may be in brain to whenin those first three centers, other area for indigo or violet)
Just have patience and listen to your heart, theres no magic to it like a lot of spiritual work may seem to have there is just putting the time into it and can be learned, belief is the key! If someone else can why cant you, all is one after all.
Of course a disclaimer to use own discrimination it matter not whether you do this or not…
"Now, what is the use of this process of the raising of the kundalini from the indifferent movement in the lower three chakras and occasionally the opening of the heart to a steady rise up into the indigo ray? For many people there is no use in it whatsoever. It is a highly individual, personal and even intimate decision… "
And here…
"You will have to judge for yourself whether this is an asset you wish to develop within yourself. There are simpler ways to envision service to others. There are simpler ways to achieve a harvestable polarity. "
Feel free to ask or talk more to me about this
1 Like
Thank you…It does seem like a worthwhile endeavor to me to understand and navigate energy blockages.
It seems like there’s a dynamic tension between mentally intensifying an internal experience like anger and also holding it loosely enough to accept it and integrate it (let is go?). I know I have questions but they are not fully formed yet.
1 Like
In this sense service to self wants to make the brightest gem.
Yes depends on how you want to use that catalyst, in that quote above I provided… the rest is as follows
"The negatively oriented mind/body/spirit complex will use this anger in a similarly conscious fashion, refusing to accept the undirected or random energy of anger and instead, through will and faith, funneling this energy into a practical means of venting the negative aspect of this emotion so as to obtain control over other-self, or otherwise control the situation causing anger.
Control is the key to negatively polarized use of catalyst. Acceptance is the key to positively polarized use of catalyst. Between these polarities lies the potential for this random and undirected energy creating a bodily complex analog of what you call the cancerous growth of tissue."
1 Like
5.2 Law of One
The first part on learning balancing, there is a discussion on that “dynamic tension”
“To begin to master the concept of mental discipline it is necessary to examine the self. The polarity of your dimension must be internalized. Where you find patience within your mind you must consciously find the corresponding impatience and vice versa. Each thought that a being has, has in its turn an antithesis. The disciplines of the mind involve, first of all, identifying both those things of which you approve and those things of which you disapprove within yourself, and then balancing each and every positive and negative charge with its equal. The mind contains all things. Therefore, you must discover this completeness within yourself.”
That is first step then more follows in that discussion…as balancing evolves to a larger stance
2 Likes
I’ve wrestled with this session quite a bit in the past few months. I love that you shared it. Tells me I’m focusing on the right things (for me). Thank you.
I think this might be the crux of my current struggle. It’s hard to sit with/examine the things you disapprove of within yourself. Difficult but worthwhile. But once you do, what does “balancing” the positive and negative charge look like? Is it like “ego” detachment. Letting go of the idea of yourself as a “good person”?
So the “completeness within yourself” would be the awareness and acceptance of both the positive and negative within yourself?
Is “postive and negative” in that context being used with a value attachment to it, like good vs. bad? That’s what I’ve been assuming, but maybe that’s an error?
2 Likes
Thank you too for the questions, im very happy to help an by having these discussions its been a mirror for reflections on myself too thus both assisting each other. Learn/Teach an Teach/Learn.
Well its all about seeing all things as love…
Well here is a quote the explains
42.2
" The exercise of first experiencing feelings and then consciously discovering their antitheses within the being has as its objective not the smooth flow of feelings both positive and negative while remaining unswayed but rather the objective of becoming unswayed. This is a simpler result and takes much practice, shall we say.
The catalyst of experience works in order for the learn/teachings of this density to occur. However, if there is seen in the being a response, even if it is simply observed, the entity is still using the catalyst for learn/teaching. The end result is that the catalyst is no longer needed. Thus this density is no longer needed. This is not indifference or objectivity but a finely tuned compassion and love which sees all things as love. This seeing elicits no response due to catalytic reactions. Thus the entity is now able to become co-Creator of experiential occurrences. This is the truer balance."
That love in my experience is like a vibration a feeling.
Once you have that that first part of balancing then the next part come into play… an may shed some light on your inquiry.
5.2
“The second mental discipline is acceptance of the completeness within your consciousness. It is not for a being of polarity in the physical consciousness to pick and choose among attributes, thus building the roles that cause blockages and confusions in the already-distorted mind complex. Each acceptance smoothes part of the many distortions that the faculty you call judgment engenders.”
That is when balancing exercise start to change… it is a more natural process that will automatically occur when you get to that point.
All this can be complex… its handy to go back to basics and most essential as a reminder too- the main and most importance talked about in Law of One is this
10.14
" Exercise One. This is the most nearly centered and usable within your illusion complex. The moment contains love. That is the lesson/goal of this illusion or density. The exercise is to consciously seek that love in awareness and understanding distortions. The first attempt is the cornerstone. Upon this choosing rests the remainder of the life-experience of an entity".
2 Likes
Thank you for sharing an interesting synopsis.
Session 41 pondered this week touches on so
much light then where’s the dark?
Maybe an
idea that the function of consciousness as the
greater point of interest than chemical bodies.
Maybe a definition of life might be
more appropriately placed on the function of
consciousness than placed on say, chemical
bodies?
In this sense, everything might seem
alive in various states if vibration. For example,
we wash down a lifeless vitamin and mineral
tablet and our chemical body assimilates it
into life - or was it already alive and we just
consciously take it for granted somehow?
The water we share amoungst ourselves is
both innate to our alive bodies and innate in
lifeless inanimate transitions, or not?
Might holy water as blessed be more
conscious than not?
So a lyric improv for Session 41 seems some
curious choice of song but then there’s a point
where all songs seem to have an invisible
metaphysical layer, like a second verse which
may touch on some profound idea like life.
Is a song lifeless until we hear it and it becomes
alive within us? Maybe a song is like some
daily vitamin, innate lifelessness into life.
In this case, so many songs lay dormant.
FAR THOUGHT
(Song beat similar to Bishop Briggs, Dark Side)
Enter into far thought
(Ohahwon, ohahwon)
Enter into far thought
For only those who sought
Our Ra Ra Ra Ra
Enter into deep think
By will to voyage on
Spiral up the sunlight
To fusions of smiles
And photons Hot photons
Return into creation
Here as flush with life
We’re torn right from left
Brain hemisphere wise
But by will in time
Total balance mind
Evolves our guise
Enter into, enter into
(Ohahwon, ohahwon)
Enter into far thought
(Ohahwon, ohahwon)
Violet ray imbalance
Not totally awake
Fasting off the excess
Reprogramming by faith
When you feel imbalance
When you learn to know
When to reach out to grow
Enter into far thought
To fully activate our mind
Our Ra Ra Ra Ra
Meaningless locations
When everything is one
Offspring of sub logos
Alive on higher plane
Harmony
But lessons used
in sorrows way
Here as flush with life
We’re torn right from left
Brain hemisphere wise
But by will in time
Total balance mind
Evolves our guise
Enter into, enter into
(Ohahwon, ohahwon)
Enter into far thought
(Ohahwon, ohahwon)
Violet ray imbalance
Not totally awake
Fasting off the excess
Reprogramming by faith
When you feel imbalance
When you learn to know
When to reach out to grow
Enter into far thought
Enter into far thought
Enter into far thought
Enter into far thought
Enter into (ohahwon)
Enter into (ohahwon)
Enter into (ohahwon)
Enter into (ohahwon)
Violet ray imbalance
Not totally awake
Fasting off the excess
Reprogramming by faith
When you feel imbalance
When you learn to know
When to reach out to grow
Enter into far thought
(Ohahwon, ohahwon)
Enter into far thought
(Ohahwon, ohahwon)
Enter into far thought
2 Likes
Thanks Quan. This is a helpful mapping of the work. Experiencing the polarity of feelings, acceptance, consciously seek love in the moment.
1 Like
Sometimes it’s hard to find border between humility and enslavement.
1 Like
I see necessity for the identity concept less and less, or even stopping understand it. It’s very strange because each one is unique so you cannot group them. Why needing grouping? And why having names at all?
Set theory looks very strange unless maybe if it’s intuitionistic logic.
A name is a very strong box (from here)
I think it’s not 100% correct. For example the following should not happen to my opinion:
26.23 Questioner: Could you please give me an example from, let us say, Hiroshima or Nagasaki of how this is done?
Ra: I am Ra. Those who were destroyed, not by radiation, but by the trauma of the energy release, found not only the body/mind/spirit complex made unviable, but also a disarrangement of that unique vibratory complex you have called the spirit complex, which we understand as a mind/body/spirit complex, to be completely disarranged without possibility of re-integration. This would be the loss to the Creator of part of the Creator and thus we were given permission, not to stop the events, but to ensure the survival of the, shall we say, disembodied mind/body/spirit complex. This we did in those events which you mention, losing no spirit or portion or holograph or microcosm of the macrocosmic Infinite One.
24.4 In the Egyptian and the South American experiments results, though not as widely devastating, were as far from the original intention of the Confederation. It was clear to not only us but also to the Council and the Guardians that our methods were not appropriate for this particular sphere.
Well, with many people I talk the clumsiness and awkwardness is a reason to point at my unfoundedness. Such criticism they consider to be positive. Often I do not know what to answer to that because my criticism will just make further loop.
1 Like
To offer another self perspective, your sincerity and earnestness in seeking are what shines through, Oleksii. I think this is what Q’uo is saying matters most.
There are lots of reasons for clumsy and awkward communication and it is rarely onesided :)… which may be what you were getting at.
2 Likes
It reminds me
48.8 When the entity becomes aware in its mind/body/spirit complex totality of the mechanism for spiritual evolution it, itself, will arrange and place those lessons and entities necessary for maximum growth and expression of polarity in the incarnative experience before the forgetting process occurs. The only disadvantage of this total free will of those senior entities choosing the manner of incarnation experiences is that some entities attempt to learn so much during one incarnative experience that the intensity of catalyst disarranges the polarized entity and the experience thus is not maximally useful as intended.
Please pardon me as potentially take this out of
context, but this idea reminds me of some sort if
stereotype where dudes seems emotionally out
of touch and chicks constantly disappointed by
some hopeless disconnect as either being over
emotional and not making logical sense or else
impossible to understand. You might call such
a stereotype that of a reckless hack, but I’ll
counter argue the world’s full of this stuff.
But specifically, I was pondering such disconnect
in terms of The Significator archetypes:
The Hierophant, The Hanged Man, and The Sun,
as related to each other - sharing some common
mechanism. And the idea of language came
to mind - which seems trivial for The Hierophant,
however gets tricky with the body and the spirit.
In order for the Significator to process experience,
there’s fundamentally a listening step where
information is gathered. We listen to our mind,
we listen to our body, and we listen to our spirit.
Once information is gathered, some assessment
is made typically by some comparison to some
reference frame. The frame may be a memory,
or some external example, or a silent ground
state, etc. It’s about evolving our discernment.
The language of the body may be
about strength, or energy level, stress level,
soreness, ability to do something physical, etc.
Many people don’t listen to their bodies, they
delegate responsibility of it’s health to their
expert doctor who is trusted to diagnose and
remedy whatever ails it. A simple body
practice seems about hunger and satiation,
seeking food that’s appetizing.
Furthermore, people listen to their spirit and
compare it by how they feel, even though
they may have no words to express their
feelings in some way that helps them
arrive at evolved insights from some
Significator feedback.
I do think that if people could articulate in
words, the language of body and spirit,
there might be lesser sense of some
stereotypical disconnection - but before
they can articulate, they need to first
experience a bunch of things then listen
to the outcomes in the language of the
body and the spirit before attempting to
transcribe into language of the mind.
A lot of communication gets conveyed
by facial expression, without people
even realizing it. A spontaneous smile
might be contageous, an incessant frown
might indicate some problem unresolved.
We might listen to ourselves by looking
at the expressiins of those around us
and owning the feeling that undelies it
as important messages to significate.
2 Likes