Hmmmm. There was not a single thing that is objectively offensive in my questions about your opinion on elites – they were unpleasant to you by subjective reasons i.e. projections/fears. For me seems like you defend your boundaries from an attack you’ve imagined yourself.
You just saying there is no fear, aggression, etc. in your response doesn’t mean there isn’t you know?
And… have you ever experienced joy from being framed as ‘bad guy’?
When you attack someone’s identity there appears the necessity to prove and clarify if a receiver calls you to. If you want your word to have weight, of course. You can certainly decline the clarification or drown others’ perception in some vogue staff, but it will tell a lot about your current, let’s say, vibration:)
Alright, you’ve addressed imaginary STS guy who by your order should not be afraid and should understand that this is the OK path:) Off the table.
Buuuut! Don’t you see that your other messages carry more metadata that you explain in your reply? Like YOU WANT ME TO DIVIDE, YOU DEMAND FROM ME CONDITIONS…, YOU CREATE LIMITATIONS WITH YOUR QUESTIONS!!! Pretty bold statements, huh?
Here are the questions. Bruh:
Does anyone else sees an intention to demand division from a person? Or that I want someone to divide.
Lol
I think you are totally fine humble… 
I wonder if Nikita was not seeing what he was saying on unity more as a concept along perhaps not just his own perspective but more as a general anonymous perspective to have, as he wished to attain but also as a fair mission to have in general
I might be wrong as on the course of the thread I sometimes lost myself and probably skipped what was meant… lol
Looks like misunderstanding of what division is, but it’s hard to understand the stumbling block.
I had an emotion, an impulse, and I expressed it. I lived through it. If I have an impulse, living it is part of my path. No matter what it is. My experience and the experience of what will happen next. I don’t want to block or correct any impulses. I am who I am. After living through it, the tension disappeared. And it became unimportant who is right or wrong now. It doesn’t matter at all. If it matters to you, that’s your path and your impulse. Your experience, and you are free to live it however you want
I am not a representative of that society I am heading towards. But I am heading there. I see this society as being based on the principles of respecting will. This means it doesn’t matter what anyone does; that doesn’t make them worse or better, because such gradations simply cannot exist. There can’t be a judgment about who is right or not, because there is no meaning in that. There is the experience of living, and every experience is valuable, no matter what it is
Therefore, my messages are about me and concern only me.
Sooooo… Do what thou wilt that will be the whole of the Law? Is that your motto?
Your society description sounds like a serial killer paradise. Doesn’t matter what anyone does!
Anyway. It’s enough information for people here to see the hints of your current character. I wish you well. Unfortunately speaking to you feels to me like your true self is behind the wall. The non-duality wall made of hollow general statements mixed with delusions.
The understanding of paradise for serial killers is correct. I think that’s also why we haven’t met aliens yet. Once, an isolated society of aborigines, who only knew spears, came across a weapon, and they shot each other and ceased to exist. Now, Elon Musk has given an Amazonian tribe, which had never known what the internet is, unlimited internet access, and it turned out to be on the brink of extinction because everyone fell into the abyss of the internet and stopped doing the everyday actions necessary for their survival.
Everything goes in its own course, and everything has its time. A society without limitations, morals, judgments, rules, laws, debates over who is right and who is better — is possible. If this happens now and everywhere, it will be an apocalypse. Therefore, this is not the final goal, but a path.
I am heading towards this and I know many are too.
It may feel like a “wall,” indifference, coldness, when the emotional reaction of the ego is reduced to a minimum. But it’s reduced to a minimum, not because I am so enlightened, but rather because I experience what arises and don’t hold it within, I let it go. Emotion is not literally a part of me, but an experience that can be lived through. And then move on to the next. I lived the emotion in the moment, and now it’s gone. And I feel love. When I give myself the right to be who I am and respect the right of another to express themselves as they wish. Without judgment and without trying to figure out who’s right and who’s not. Because there’s no need for that. Everyone is on their own path of experience, and every experience is important and valuable, no matter what it is.
Seeking an external solution to your own suffering is still keeping this suffering on and on.
Acceptance of how the world is is also acceptance of its flaws, pain, sufferance, everything that is already is. Once we let down or go our projections themselves rooted in our own desires, themselves rooted in our own pain we just accept the world as it is : the experimentation which teaches us, and we learn. Then we start to live happily again, and this joy spreads around. We also let go the need to correct things. Our lively day, we fill it with the quality of our inner selves, one that is on the path of letting go negative emotions such as anger, projections, etc.
Settling in our depth, our self is the “correctness” you seek. It is from that inner depth that love, light, joy, wisdom spreads around
INDEED. I have always tried to figure out that if the long awaited promised kingdom of God comes on this earth, it will find many developed systems of conduct and thus the purpose will be to improve these systems not to tople them out.
For we are in this point of life where we already have alot to govern thus we are at these point trying to find a way to govern web:3.0 (A.I) and 4.0 (A.i within machine) so they may corporate with human being and nature overall. Unless if they get caught in the matrix and consciously prioritize security of technology and mareriality.
The only issue that has introduced problem within the legal fraternity is the disregadment of natural laws and promote more of legal positivism. Thus you see government developing their laws motivated by their own selfs and in this are demonic thoughts manifested to govern the mentality of the people.
The government opens up a free will world and now people are doing accordingly to their own will which is also motivated by the dominant darkness within them for they walk not in the light of the eye(I). The food they consume has cloged their eye they cannot see the beauty of earth and the beauty of day.
So lets medidate for the eternal light within us so we may have a well civilization motivated by the true light of the true eye. Forever we aim high!!
There is an issue. When you speak about your internal state and you communicate with another, it is becoming external also because it’s done outside. So the another one who you communicate with can state it´s not your internal deed only. So it creates a paradox how to let someone know about your internal state.
I think in most cases I should take responsibility for the words spoken if another side thinks so. And on the one hand such commutation might be just a manipulation with avoiding responsibility every time saying “I’m just speaking about me loudly so feel free to do with my words whatever you want”. On another hand it’s natural to speak in such manner between loving people, but it just can produce misunderstanding because of what I called paradox.
I consider it a lack of language possibilities so I would like to explicitly use an “internal/external” prefix when I do need it. “Internal” - when I want to share my inner state without imposing any obligation on both sides, “external” - when I do need to demand something from another side and hence be responsible for my words also.
It does mot eliminate the paradox but makes it clear.
I am responsible for my feelings. I am not responsible for the feelings of others. I respect what I feel. I respect what others feel. What I express affects what others feel, and that’s normal. Everyone is free to express what they feel. I am talking about the absence of judgment and condemnation. When I have no judgment or condemnation, I do not place the responsibility for my feelings on others.
Mords, I think you join the Maharishi who when asked, how do you deal with what goes on in the world, said :
“ I re-arrange myself and the world re-arranges itself around me ..”
