I think the Tibetans seem ahead in
mapping out the Bardo, so to speak.
There’s mandala, mantra, and dream
yoga that all foster some sense of
discerning and navigating so.
I reflect that mankind likes to build
machines that can be integrations
of thousands of parts. The parts have
distinct forms, fit, and function.
These machine creators assign
part numbers, and serial numbers
to track, manage and assemble
machines. The creation of machines
is a group effort that enables their
collaboration in a joint creation.
It seems somewhat of a power trip
to build machines - lots of self discipline
and exacting control to reduce
variation and improve consistency.
Putting names to things might be
no different, names help us manage
form, fit, and function to make sense
of the universe as if it is a machine.
People who use the name may not
understand everything about what
goes into the name.
I ponder Jesus when he walked the
earth as a human being. He used
the name God, but did he understand
the Ra Materials? Maybe Yahweh
was God to him, or from a mono-
theistic standpoint, One God was
inseparable from Yahweh. Or is it,
that One God permeates all things
as One Infinite Creator?
And getting back to the Tibetans,
they may be ahead in a sense
one god permeating all things or
one infinite creator may not be
useful because it’s just another
term for everything.
However, human experience as
veiled may intrinsically distort the
comprehension of unity where
higher densities less veiled better
So for example The Council of Nine
may not reside many degrees far
inseparable from so many names
we assign to our spiritual linkages
that speak more for our own personal
linkages than to the entirety of the
whole responding along our links.
The entirety of the whole seems best
described as the one infinite creator,
and so many names and gods and
personalities, committees and so -
might speak more loudly as the link
we have with them.
For example, Jesus had a link that
he called God, he had a link that he
called Satan, and on the other side
of those links - one infinite creator.
As he worked to embolden his links,
he gained super powers or siddhis.
I think that the types of links you
develop depend on polarization.
For example, Ukraine warriors
may be 4D STS links, killing more
idiot Russians than they save,
killing another as hallmark of STS
no matter the justification. In fact
I see Ukraine becoming the new
head of Russia, a sort of STS
The Dalai Lama, by contrast, leads
a 4D STO community who flees
amidst cultural genocide instead
of fighting. Tibet as not the new
head of China, (which may also be
a sort of slave state.). The Dalai
Lama has a siddhi of being stoked.
Better to be stoked in my opinion.