I don’t think free will precisely works like that. It isn’t a question of ‘people don’t want a nuclear war’. It’s not the Law of Attraction. I think it’s more that people choose either good, bad or indifferent and things work out in relation to that general choice. So if a person is good/ service to others, they are being guided by the positive entities and bad/ STS they are handed over to the negative entities. I will use an example to illustrate.
Kind of scary when you think of it like that.
But even so we do have a proxy for the expression of free will. We have voting. It’s also, in my belief, that the term ‘free will’ is a beginning, but there is more in understanding the concept. Like, These things manifest in the real world so people generally understand them. The negative can’t just “go to war” because the illusion of democracy would be broken too fiercely. They have to make a whole narrative and lies so that when they do what they were going to do anyway, the population has some justification for it. Even if they do not want it, they have a reason, they are too apathetic to actually do anything to stop it, and they justify it by the fact they voted.
But on the topic more precisely. Firstly, do nuclear weapons even exist? It’s a worthwhile question. “They lie to the fish”. Here is someone discussing the area in general. Video practically starts at 1:50:
So, we don’t know that the Confederation is stopping anything in particular.
We also have a good example with the current election. The chessboard is set so the pieces are positioned. Everyone is ready for War it’s just whether Trump gets in and stops it or Kamala gets in and her handlers kick it off for real:
AP: US is sending more troops to the Middle East as violence rises between Israel and Hezbollah: US sends more troops to Middle East as tensions rise between Israel and Hezbollah | AP News
NBC News: Pentagon puts 8,500 troops on ‘heightened alert’ as U.S. weighs military action against Russia: Pentagon puts 8,500 troops on 'heightened alert' as U.S. weighs military action against Russia
So what we see here is a simple expression of free will. Now, Kamala voters don’t necessarily know this. A lot of Kamala voters are single issue voters. They want to be able to abort children. They don’t consciously agree with US-EU vs. BRICS war, leading probably to the destruction of the US-EU imo. They don’t consciously agree to get Napalmed which will probably be how that ends. But they have chosen their polarity and that’s how I think the whole area works.
A quote from Ayn Rand, a person is free to make choices, but not free from consequence:
[Man] is a specific organism of a specific nature that requires specific actions to sustain his life. . . . That which his survival requires is set by his nature and is not open to his choice. What is open to his choice is only whether he will discover it or not, whether he will choose the right goals and values or not. He is free to make the wrong choice, but not free to succeed with it. He is free to evade reality, he is free to unfocus his mind and stumble blindly down any road he pleases, but not free to avoid the abyss he refuses to see. . . . Man is free to choose not to be conscious, but not free to escape the penalty of unconsciousness: destruction.