Fair enough — and thank you for clarifying. I think I finally see where the misunderstanding crept in.
When you used the word shallow, you were speaking in the Confederation sense — as in being absorbed only in survival, routine, or surface activity, without attunement to inner feeling or spirit. I wasn’t thinking of that meaning at all. I was using shallow in a broader sense, simply as “outer layers of experience,” and my point was that even the seeming surface can carry its own kind of grace.
So just to be clear, I wasn’t implying that you are “deeply shallow” — that line was only meant to illustrate my point, not to label you.
As for the broader picture you’re describing — the transitions between densities, the disruptions to the 3D-to-4D pathway, and the importance of focusing one’s attention if one wants to move onward — I’m not in a position where I can confirm or deny any of that. At this point, I mostly view myself as a phenomenon that seems to endure, moving through phases, practicing balance and the art of not forcing.
Your focus makes sense within the framework you’re operating from. I just tend to emphasize that even the parts of life that appear mundane or simple on the surface can still be deeply aligned with spirit.
Sometimes people feel very defensive about their view of the world when they meet someone with different interests, so it can help to step back and see that we all come here for different purposes. Our souls decide we could use an incarnation that explores mental illness or early terminal illness, and that can be hard to accept. But the view on the soul’s level is so much easier to take than the view on our level. We’ve chosen to be here to learn about one thing or another–and it will all be over soon–so calm down and see what there is to see, respond as lovingly as you are able.
Our Brothers and Sisters of the negative polarity have their work too, and they are very good at it. Make no mistake, there is a war over consciousness that has been going on for a very long time on this planet that is ramping up at the close of the master cycle.
Very often the question is more important than the answer.
Would STO ET’s give specific information on world events, when over and over in the L/L channeled information they state that not violating free will is paramount?
I would phrase it a little differently. Wonder travels in the opposite direction of certainty. I didn’t know Don Elkins obviously, but the sense I get is that he was following his curiosity which travels in tandem with wonder in my opinion.
Yes, there is a sense in which wonder leads to curiosity which leads to seeking.
The gist of my rant above was about the difference between seeking answers like, “The cat in the picture indicates blah-blah” and actually seeking to serve by deliberately refining one’s instrument of consciousness to better bring forth Divine love. That is to say, in one sense, a person can ask questions and not really grow from the experience. In my way-out-on-a-limb perspective, what we see in Don Elkins’ example is the Law of Responsibility (you must use what you learn) coming home to roost. Because he pushed into a more esoteric circumstance without developing the internal rigor needed to surrender his personality to the process (bit by bit), he made himself vulnerable to the passions of his darker feelings.
Boy that YouTube channel is just spiritual by-passing in my opinion, and a lot of new age silliness (I do not mean to offend anyone).
I learned my lesson early on that giving these types of subjects and YT channels my attention, just created more stress, confusion and filled my head with unnecessary information, that never goes anywhere or is unverifiable in any way. It’s seems more like conspiracy infotainment than anything spiritual or meaningful honestly.
I simply assume there are those who are seeking to know and abide in the light of the divine creation or creator, wherever they may exist, and that human beings are here to make their unconscious, conscious, as a result of the human experience in the gross material plane. If they call themselves a “Federation” or a “Council,” fine, but unless it’s something that my higher-self and inner-world can either learn or benefit from, it really is all just noise to me…stories, ego-driven narratives, fan fiction etc..,
I glanced at the gfl as mentioned in this thread, agreed with the consensus here and moved on.
I missed your reference to EA at that time. I have since found her, and feel a kinship and alignment with her authenticity. She is a highly developed being of light, honouring her soul pattern, and I assess her subscription fee as fair and reasonable. She has her own “GFL” messages. The other GFL on youtube smells off, and a different, possibly controlled opposition or obfuscation style narrative.
I subscribed to EA and will share further if you ask. I took a week off after working 24 days straight, and decided to search for remote viewing, which led me to Elizabeth April. All the best.
‘GFL station’ is absolute rubbish. hidden agenda, to obfuscate, promote elitism, and drain financially, and push away from self work. And many more copycat you tube channels. Anything that promotes elitism like ‘lightworkers will save the day and be rewarded in ceremonies after this life’ yawn they are disappointing, and should be treated with caution.
I missed the difference between two of them at least from the point of view how they name themselves.
Galactic Federation of Light
Confederation of Planets in the Service of the Infinite Creator
For example, if looking Cambridge dictionary they are:
Confederation: an organization consisting of different groups of people working together for business or political reasons
Federation: a group of organizations, countries, regions, etc. that have joined together to form a larger organization or government
It looks a bit messy what the difference between organization of groups or group of organizations is. This is a good description to my opinion:
The essential difference between a confederation and a federation are as follows: 1) confederation member states may autonomously decide whether they would act independently abroad (e.g. to maintain diplomatic relations, to conclude international agreements, etc.); on the other hand, federal entities (members of a federation) do not have such an option, or they may possibly be given such an option (to an extend which is considered relevant) by the central (federal) government; 2) the internal borders between confederation member states may be changed only by international treaties adopted at an international conference, whereas the internal borders between federal entities may be unilaterally established and changed by the central government; 3) confederation member states, in principle, have the secession right (ius secessionis) to withdraw from the confederation, whereas federal entities have no such right. It should be noted that a confederation, as a rule, has a capacity of legal personality in international law, just as its individual members.
A good example of the difference between a Federation and a Confederation would be to look at the United States of America when the Civil War broke out in 1861. There were 34 States before the Civil War started that made up the federal government of the United States. After the war started, 11 States had seceded from the union of the federal government, and they joined a confederation of states calling themselves the Confederate States of America. As a confederation, each State had control of their own State and the laws within, but were a part of the Confederation as an organization that shared common goals. All of the States that were still a part of the Union of the federal government of America had to follow whatever the federal government’s rules were. The federal government is superior to each State’s individual laws and so forth. The federal government told the southern States that it was not legal for them to.secede from the Union but they did so anyway.
This is also not a good example because in my opinion, the Confederate States of America were wrong because their number one common interest was to secure the legality of slavery in their states. The federal government wanted to abolish slavery, which would make them the good guys. And this is just my opinion, but in general, I tend to think that a federal government is more militaristic in its thinking and does not allow for individuality. A confederation, like a confederation of planets, would be societies of entities that all share similar beliefs and interests, and are choosing to join a Confederation that would be like-minded in its goals. But each member of the Confederation still maintains its own individuality, ideals, and beliefs.
I believe that the Confederation of Planets, in regards to Earth, all share a similar interest in wanting to help to serve Earth, but they all do so in their own ways with the unique gifts that the entities on each Planet have to offer. Whereas, the Galactic Federation, I think is more about what the laws are that everyone must obey concerning planet Earth. I think the Galactic Federation established and is responsible for maintaining the quarantine around Earth. Other entities like the Orion entities are finding ways to bypass this law, but the Galactic Federation has made it a law that there is a certain interference that is not allowed on Earth, or at least was not allowed on Earth before we started becoming fourth density. Ahhh, just my thoughts.
I am spending some time on farsight (farsightprime), and they use a similar term, for the ‘good E.T.s’ which is
Galactic Federation of worlds.
Going out on a limb here, but I feel these 3 terms are of the same group, which is invested in supporting growth, freedom, disclosure and all 3 have reason and love as their hallmarks. All 3 oppose deception, control and manipulation and suppression of Earth’s ancient past and heritage of genetic ancestry. (GFL as used by Elisabeth April specifically, not the distortions of GFL created to deceive).
It is 3 terms describing 3 teams of ‘freedom for earth’ motivation. I don’t see the separation, in the dream layer.
I believe if a group does not allow to leave someone then it’s a slavery concept (not discussing conditions at the moment). So when federation does not allow someone to leave hence it’s also a slavery concept. It’s interesting (as you said) that the ones who wanted to detach were for slavery themselves, a kind of inconsistency, I mean the Golden Rule.
