This is a moment from a generally interesting session. It might be of interest to some.
Questioner
Q’uo, the famous 20th Century psychic, Edgar Cayce, once said that there is a fine line between being an angel and being a devil, and the desired task of a soul is to get itself psychologically precisely into the divine middle, and that anything to the left or anything to the right is off the divine middle, and therefore not of the divine. Can you speak on this?
Q’uo
I am Q’uo and am aware of your query, my brother. We would suggest that this type of envisioning of the path to the One Infinite Creator is a valid path. However, there may be times during which the seeker of truth begins to express more and more of the positive, or light-filled path than the darker, or receptive path. There is the opportunity to express both that which is radiant and that which is absorbent in each instances of the seeker of truth’s seeking of the One Infinite Creator. We would suggest that as the seeker of truth travels this path, it is most helpful to seek first, to become that which is radiant, that which is positive, that which is unity with all of the creation, for this allows the further experience of the entirety of the creation to become available to the seeker of truth. The seeker of truth which has mastered the positive path may then begin to experience and express that which is absorbent so that it pursues what seems to be a negative path, but is that which is exploring the light within the darkness to discover that the darkness does not overcome the light.
If the negative path is that which is first expressed and experienced, there comes a time much further along the seeker of truth’s path of seeking during which this experience of the light and the dark is available, that is, within the sixth density of the illusion of the One Infinite Creator, where it is discovered by the negatively oriented entities that have attempted to absorb all about them, all the power about them, in order to control those about them, can go no further until they see that all they control is the One Infinite Creator seen as the self, and the self is seen not just as the individual self, but the self of all other beings which have been controlled or attempted to be controlled by the path of the seeker of negative wisdom.
Thus, we suggest to each seeker of truth that the positive path is the path that is most easily followed, and offers the least distortion to the seeker of truth.
This probably seems out on the extreme edge of things for most of us, but actually, we all practice STS psychology when we protect ourselves against that which we cannot bring ourselves to love. The interplay between freely given love and withheld love is, in my view, at the root of most human drama. Some people make a bigger deal out of giving love, some make a bigger deal out of withholding love, and most of us muddle around in the middle most of the time.
Casey’s ideal of a “divine middle,” as I see it, is a reference to the ability to freely chose to be loving, self-protective or anything else at will in response to what emerges.