In my opinion, the reality is much simpler. I put forward catalyst you wished not to see, ergo it blindsided you.
Now that you put it this way, I can better see why you are so ragingly disrespectful.
What do think you’re talking about? I was saying I didn’t notice my typo.
Oh, I was just peeking through the keyhole to see if there was any light inside, thank you for opening the door to illuminate my curiosity and not leaving me guessing 
For me, faith is not a decision. It is a symptom of understanding what ‘All is One’ implies as I aim to walk together with reality rather than be dragged along or run ahead of it.
I think of interacting with one as interacting with all.
I don’t go around thinking about this constantly, though. Most of the time, I simply rely on intuition and an evolving sense of appropriate dynamics, focusing on what’s at hand and adjusting to the refinement of my preferences.
I believe there are bad ideas, while no bad people. I have faith that everyone is doing the best they can; I do not presume I would act any differently than the worst of us if I had lived their life from start to end.
I consider all conflicts as internal, regardless of the scale on which they play out.
Violence is a primitive form of communication that is slowly becoming obsolete
(though probably not in our lifetime).
That is why that article gave the sail of my faith a fresh breeze. It essentially advocates for our Oneness.
When we land in the understanding of what that implies—even if only on a theoretical level like in the research presented—Love and compassion have a tendency to naturally open up and fall into place, so to say.
p.s, this conversation reminded me of a painting I did last year 
edit, and the painting was inspired by writing this song that came out of my encounter with paramedics and hospital staff 
I’m not mad, I’m relieved. I was triggered, for sure, and that’s on me. But the search for honesty that frustrated me was also pointless, and I see that now. You want this forum entirely and solely on your own terms, and now that I know that, I can work on my issues without gauging myself against your conduct.
Be well! No hard feelings.
Not to speak in Mirrors place (I’m not 100% sure I translated this correct)
But I think what he was saying in the conversation above (and have hinted in other threads),
was that his desire is to develop and be of as much service as possible,
not only in regards to the individual, but our collective as a whole,
and that might, from time to time,
come of as a little harsh from a personal perspective?
I believe his use of the term Mirror was more metaphorical than literal
He did state himself as human
How am I doing Mirror? Am I hitting the mark on some level?
or totally missing the board 
No translation needed. I think I now understand very well. I regret my animosity — I can be so credulous sometimes. I now see the entire exchanges as entirely didactic, and what I wanted to express never had a chance. I was not having a conversation; I was being instructed by my better who has a very firm and rigid idea of what’s worth saying here.
Light would be one element in there.
You’re doing fine.
Yes, it can become a tad complicated, though, when turning that into a discussion of faith in people, which was your original point.
I see humanity as being well askew of being able to slip into 4D, due to rampant confusion. I feel that if more people were less enraptured by their personality and more in touch with their deeper desires, the situation could improve greatly.
This accounts for my sometimes having very little use for shallow discussion. I’m not here for that. This forum is nominally here to help “bring4th.” Holding up a mirror is the best I can do.
That’s somewhat my point, If you truly have faith in reality as a whole, that implies faith in people and all the quirks of their personalities.
If an approach becomes a chronic source of frustration, and I’m not say yours is (that’s for you to decide), I’ve had phases where my own approach has been, and an exploration of other modes of approach has felt appropriate.
Said with utmost most humility:
I believe we, you, me and Jeremy, are ultimately aiming for the same thing, inspiring the world to become lighter and brighter, we are just naturally drawn to aim for that with different approaches. Recognizing this gives a lot of space for differences in itself.
Mirror ia about kindness and care
lol I see you all three as that too in fact, lol
During the early 20th century, there was a brief renaissance in re-thinking the nature of reality.
Consciousness cannot be accounted for in physical terms. For consciousness is absolutely fundamental. It cannot be accounted for in terms of anything else. – Erwin Schrödinger, The Observer, 11 January, 1931.
During the latter half, such profound ideas were seemingly put back in their place as science became the concern of business and its focus one of technology.
So once again, “money” was the culprit… 
It seems everywhere I look, the concept of money (or at least how we apply it) is the root cause of our societal issues.
@Kuiper Thank you for highlighting that information.
Hopefully, this time humanity is in a place where the seeds of this can sprout in our collective understanding.
Agreed, we have been approaching money as an element of substance rather than a symbolic tool for organizing recourses, the problem is as you say, how we apply it, future generations will most likely view our present system as rather barbaric.
Hi everyone,
I hope you are having a nice April. I think this passage from the Ra material could be of interest in this question. It is from session 6, question 16, referring to Earth:
6.16 Questioner: What is the position of this planet with respect to progression of the cycle at this time?
Ra: I am Ra. This sphere is at this time in fourth-dimension vibration. Its material is quite confused due to the society memory complexes embedded in its consciousness. It has not made an easy transition to the vibrations which beckon. Therefore, it will be fetched with some inconvenience.
6.17 Questioner: Is this inconvenience imminent within a few years?
Ra: I am Ra. This inconvenience, or disharmonious vibratory complex, has begun several of your years in the past. It shall continue unabated for a period of approximately three oh, thirty [30], of your years.
6.18 Questioner: After this thirty-year period I am assuming we will be a fourth-dimension or fourth-density planet. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is so.
So we’ve been in ‘fourth-dimension vibration’ as a planet for a while now.
And remember Ra has said a few times that nothing can be hidden in 4th… lol
Welcome here 4cats !! 
