About the Ra's implied warning with appurtenances and the related Materials in Ra contact

Strictly Law of One
1

Recently, i am reading the book Tilting at Windmills

In chapter 8 Find this:

GARY
Ra spoke to the necessity to maintain the proper alignments of these appurtenances. Sometimes they even mentioned when the appurtenances
were off:

RA Remain most fastidious about the alignments of the appurtenances. 71.23

RA We ward you ware of any laxity regarding the arrangement and orientation of appurtenances. 46.18

Then, about 12 sessions into the contact, you began to become aware that
there was a deeper reason that Ra stresses the very, very careful placement
and alignment of the appurtenances. Can you elaborate on what that reason was?

JIM
Ra mentioned that the Bible was 1.4 degrees out of alignment, and
perhaps five-tenths of a degree of the whole layout,[3] so that got us to
thinking because there is no way you could get the appurtenances lined
up that carefully. So we knew they were talking about something other
than the actual physical placement of the appurtenancesā€”they were talking about the alignment of our questions, our line of questioning. We had
gotten off the track a little bit from what was important to what was transient, and we tried to stay away from what was transient because this was a
narrow-band contact.

As Ra said, its preconditions were precise,[4] and in order to keep the
contact we would have to continue working in the area of spiritual principlesā€”things that you could use now and 10,000 years from now, now
and forever. If we talked about things that were transient and only are of
interest now, then we were wasting the great opportunity of the contact.
Why should the contact stay around if we were going to do that? So they
warned us first: Youā€™re kind of off a little bitā€”not important for this session.
But thereā€™s another session todayā€”much more important. So we figured it
outā€”we had to get our line of questioning straight.

GARY
How did you make that leap of realizing that they were not talking
specifically about the alignment of the physical objects but about your
questions?

JIM
Well, itā€™s a spiritual contact, and everything they talk about has a
spiritual value or component to it, so what they were saying there about
the alignment had to have a spiritual component to it. Theyā€™re not just
talking about a few degrees or tenths of a degree, so what else could it be?
It has to be our line of questioning.

Ra tries to use the appurtenances to give an implied warning, so I am interested in finding out what we should be warned about.

2

12.33 QUESTIONER Thank you. Is there anything that we can do to make the
instrument more comfortable?

RA I am Ra. We ask you to realign the object upon which the symbols sit.
It is not a significant distortion for one session only, but you will find
upon measuring the entire assemblage that the resting place is one point
four degrees [1.4Ā°] from the correct alignment, the resting place an
additional one-half degree [0.5Ā°] away from proper orientation. Do not
concern yourselves overly with this in the space/time nexus present, but
do not allow these distortions to remain over a long period or the contact
will be gradually impaired.
I am Ra. I leave you in the love and in the light of the One Infinite
Creator. Go forth, rejoicing in the power and the peace of the One
Creator. Adonai.

I reread Session 12, which is about the Orion Crusader, how the Confederation stopped the Orion chariot, the quarantine, the Guardians, the UFO flaps, and the Men in Black.

So Ra tries to warn Don not to continue in this context.

3

46.18 QUEST IONER Only if there is anything we can do to make the instrument
more comfortable or improve the contact?

RA I am Ra. Each is supporting the instrument well, and the instrument
remains steady in its purpose. You are conscientious. All is well. We ward
you ware of any laxity regarding the arrangement and orientation of
appurtenances.
I am Ra. I leave you, my friends, in the love and in the light of the One
Infinite Creator. Go forth, therefore, rejoicing in the power and the peace
of the One Infinite Creator. Adonai.

I reread Session 46 and found it very short, only about the cat Gandalf and the different ways of dealing with the emotions of STS and STO entities.

I also reread Session 45, which is very short too, about the Wanderer.

This confuses me a lot. What does Ra try to warn about? I think maybe Ra is trying to warn about future sessions, so I read Session 47.

In Session 47, Don quickly ends the question from the last session and begins a new topic.

Maybe Don understands this warning and stops asking further.

4

71.23 QUESTIONER Is there anything that we can do to improve the contact or
make the instrument more comfortable?

RA I am Ra. You are conscientious. Remain most fastidious about the
alignments of the appurtenances. We thank you.
I am Ra. I leave you in the love and in the glorious light of the Infinite
Creator. Go forth, therefore, rejoicing in the power and in the peace of
the One Infinite Creator. Adonai.

This session is about polarity and harvestability, the unmanifested being, 3D entity death, the planets in the Milky Way Galaxy, and white magic.

I havenā€™t found what to be warned about again; if you find it, please reply. Thank you!

5

77.25 QUESTIONER Is there anything that we can do after this contact to increase
the instrumentā€™s comfort as related to the psychic attack, or is there
anything we can do to make the instrument more comfortable or improve
the contact in this present situation?

RA I am Ra. The faculties of healing which each has commenced
energizing may be used. The entity may be encouraged to remain
motionless for a period. As it will not appreciate this, we suggest the
proper discussion.

The physical appurtenance called the censer was just a degree off, this
having no deeper meaning. We do ask, for reasons having to do with the
physical comfort of the instrument, that you continue in your careful
efforts at alignment. You are conscientious. All is well.

We leave you, my friends, in the glorious love and light of the One
Creator. Go forth, therefore, rejoicing in the power and in the peace of
the One Infinite Creator. I am Ra. Adonai.

ā€œRa explains how in one particular answer an alignment had no deeper meaning, implying that, in other instances, there was a deeper purpose to their statements regarding alignment:ā€

This is just about the alignment without deeper meaning.

1 Like
6

If anyone finds other sessions related to the alignment and its appurtenances, please feel free to comment. Thank you very much!

1 Like
7

Interesting find!

In my opinion, it is possible that those of Ra were referring to the actual physical objects. They may have underestimated the 3D physical limitations we would experience in adjusting the objects to such a small degree.

The ā€œthisā€ in this sentence can be interpreted both generally and specifically.

ā€¦this [occurance in this instance] having no deeper meaning

Or

ā€¦this [speaking of the misalignnments in general] having no deeper meaning

If interpreted as a general statement, Ra aware of the threeā€™s interpretation of the instructions about adjustment, may have been clarifiying.

My personal opinion is that transient information is of limited value ultimately but can be of transitional value when trying to clarify what questions it would be fruitful to ask, which I think is what Don and company were doing.

1 Like
8

Just as mysterious as a riddle. :smiley:

In order to protect the free will of the questioner, such a suggestive form is chosen for reminders and communication.

Is it possible that other parts of the Ra material also contain deeper meanings waiting to be discovered? :face_with_raised_eyebrow: :thinking: :smiling_face_with_three_hearts:

1 Like
9

Fair enough:). I can see both possiblities although I lean toward there not being a deeper meaning in this case.

With gratitude for your post, it did allow me to spend sometime searching ā€˜appurtenanceā€™ and I found this. For anyone else who crafts items with their hands, this statement of Raā€™s is a beautiful affirmation of the work that is done with love, like Jim poured into the tableā€¦

98.16 Questioner: That is perfectly fine with us. That noise occurs at the forty-five minute time since the tape is forty-five minutes on a side. I would just ask as a final question, then, if the new table that Jim has built for the appurtenances is satisfactory to hold them since it will give us more room to walk around the bed, and if it is better to leave it in its natural condition as it is, or to coat it with linseed oil or varnish or paint?

Ra: I am Ra. We view this appurtenance. It sings with joy. The pine vibrates in praise. Much investment of this working in wood has been done. It is acceptable. We may suggest it be left either as it is or rubbed with the oil which also is easily magnetized and holds the proffered vibration to a profound extent.

1 Like
10

What a beautiful affirmation!

Also, I think Ra implicitly express gratitude for the entire Ra contact.:heart:

1 Like
11

The word fastidious might stem from
late Middle English: from Latin fastidiosus , from fastidium ā€˜loathingā€™. The word originally meant ā€˜disagreeableā€™, later ā€˜disgustedā€™. Here, an impression
is lower densities can appear somewhat crude
and sloppy to higher densities, so when working
with higher densities, take extreme care in things.

The word appurtenances might stem from
Middle English: from Old French apertenance ,
based on late Latin appertinere ā€˜belong toā€™
Here an impression is Ra includes lower
densities as extremely important and not to
be disregarded lightly or considered separate.

1 Like