I’ve been re-thinking about it for several days and always returning to the analogy of a box. Also I’m analyzing how I speak with people. So predicate logic is a simple box and when I’m using it I’m often becoming nervous because I feel I lie in terms of out of the box. But in general our reality should also be a box that is connected to negation. Psychically it might be connected to forgetting and ability to lie. Because this box is mental it’s hard to climb out mentally, that’s why they often say about problem with mind. Box is also figured in tarot cards. And recently I posted a document about Larson’s theory mentioned in Ra sessions. I was checking internet for opinion about it and looks like scientists think it’s conspiracy theory and/or pseudoscience. But mathematician (see Gödel 2b) proved they cannot prove 
So their point of view to Larson’s theory is not consistent enough. Finally Ra say it “is a correct system as far as it is able to go”. So this is a quote from the document I’m trying understand, and the box is here again:
One of the least understood concepts known to man is that of time. A great deal of headway regarding the nature of time was made by engineer Dewey B. Larson, published in his 1959 book, The Structure of the Physical Universe.1 Larson asserts that both space and time are simply the aspects of a reciprocal ratio that he refers to as motion,2 have no other meaning, and cannot exist independently outside of this relation. He often drew an analogy to a box, with the outside being space, the inside being time, and the box being motion. If you have an inside and outside, then you have a box. If you have a box, then you have an inside and an outside. If you have an outside then you have an inside; an inside then an outside.
So it is with space (outside), time (inside) and motion (box). The three concepts are always connected and cannot operate independently. Larson’s theory eventually became known as the Reciprocal System of physical theory.
Timelines
The setback that occurs in many of these projects is the failure to understand the properties of time. And fortunately for us,14 they are usually too arrogant to admit that their science is inadequate! Those in charge of these projects always listen to the “experts.” And my definition of an “expert”: a person that knows more and more, about less and less, until he knows everything about nothing.
As a result, the incorrect concept of time being linear and vectorial (the “arrow of time” stuff) predominates scientific thought—and is taught in all the schools, so most people never think beyond that box. In order to understand the “timelines,” one must understand 3D time as a temporal landscape, and in that landscape, the “future” is what is in front of you, and the “past” is what is behind you. The “present” is where you are standing in the temporal landscape. And I would like to clarify that—the “present” does not change. If you were to freeze your presence in the moment called “now,” you would be eternal. But it would also be rather boring, as nothing would ever change! So when considering the concept of past, present and future, try thinking of it as an orientation in a 3- dimensional, temporal landscape—and your position is constantly shifting, ever so slightly, even when believe you are “still.”
Consider the implications of this scenario: just like in space, no two people can exist at the same point in coordinate time; there is always some separation. This infers that each person’s view of the past and future is slightly different… the general features of the terrain (mountains, rivers, valleys, etc) can be agreed upon, but things up close can have a radically different perspective. If two people turn to face each other, then they are destined to meet in the future (what is in front of them)—just a few temporal steps away.15
Now consider the psionic side (the psychic, metaphysical or ESP side). In space, we can see a car a half mile away, driving down a road heading towards us and consider it “normal.” In time, if one sees a car heading towards us in the temporal landscape, we call it “precognition.” Precognition is the ability to see a distance (technically a “duration”) in the coordinate time landscape—Larson’s concept of clock space. If you and I were standing 10 seconds apart in that temporal landscape, that car might hit you and miss me, even though we “predicted an impact,” because we both saw it heading our way. We could discuss the approaching car, and people in the spatial realm would think we are telepathic— because we are standing right next to each other in time, and our spatial bodies could be miles apart. The “timelines” are just a larger view of the same system—rather than people on the landscape, consider towns and villages (collectives) that, due to their temporal proximity, will share a similar past and future—but not necessarily identical.
When a timeline is created, what has happened is that someone hired a temporal bulldozer and altered the terrain. With a TVG, you can target a specific feature of that terrain and with appropriate resonance, flatten a hill, change the course of a river, or build a mountain. You have not changed the course of anyone living in the temporal landscape, but now they have to work around the modified features of the landscape.
Suppose you are driving down the road to work, but today someone dropped a tree across the road. Rather than deal with the alteration of the terrain, odds are you will just turn around, and take another route—an alternate route, or in the temporal landscape, an alternate timeline. Because the tree was in front of you, you consciously changed your future by taking a different route, and by taking that route, you will encounter many new things and situations that you would not have encountered on the old route.
Now here’s the surprise consequence… there is no temporal law that says you cannot get out of your car, move the tree, and continue along the route you wanted to follow in the first place! It creates an inconvenience,16 but is not insurmountable. Once you know what is coming, you don’t have to still be in the way once it gets here. If you were standing on a street, looked up and saw a piano falling out a 10th story window right above you, would you just scream, “the end is near!” and get squashed, or just step out of the way?
If you remain ignorant, you’ll just follow the crowd around the obstacles placed by those that formed the timeline, going where they wanted you to go. Let’s face it, people are lazy and will usually take the easiest path. And that is how they keep control—providing easy “paths,” not only in timelines, but in politics, legality, economics, food, fuel… just about anything you can name. Odds are you never even knew that there was a choice. Those who wake up, have a choice.
Implementing the choice is another matter.
