The Psochic Hegemony; A Map of Service to Others-Self

[Alisru]

I’m only allowed one image upload per post so this changes it from my original message, it may be more disjointed. There’s 3 more coming

Hi everyone, greetings in the light of truth and understanding

I bring to you all a tool you can use to assist in the perception of imperceptible, I called it the Psochic Hegemony or the ruling principle of the mind.

I’ll try not to go too deep into it so far to avoid triggering overthinking, just safe to say that it’s a map of consciousness, of emotion, of morality, of good and bad, of who benefits

As you’re looking over the maps just pay attention to the 4 major points; the greater good, lesser evil, greater evil and lesser good, and understand what they mean

Now focus on the greater good, understanding what greater good means, and think greater evil

You should feel a kind of tension or distinctly ‘wrong’ feeling.

Then focus on the greater evil, understanding what greater evil means, and think greater good

You should feel a kind of lightness or distinctly ‘right’ feeling

If you overthink it then you feel nothing. If you don’t know what good or evil means then you’ll feel nothing

The majority of people I’ve tested feel nothing. Support workers or people with a propensity for service-to-others have the pre-requisite information structures to anchor and reflect from, and they report feeling the gradients between good and bad, lesser and greater. An other I’ve tried with reported just feeling a sharp divide between good and bad

[Alisru]

This second test is much easier for most people, to demonstrate I’ve brought a nice basket of fruit as a visual aid. The point here is to listen to the feelings your body gives you

I feel like you have to try to overcomplicate this lesson to not feel anything.Take the basket of fruit and place it somewhere on the first map. You’ll likely place it on greater good as that’s where it feels the most ‘right’

Then move the basket of fruit and put it on the greater evil and you should feel that distinct sense of ‘wrong’

Then you can move the basket around on the map to feel the lesser versions of good and bad

[Alisru]

This becomes important when moving to the second map with the perceptually inverted zone in the center. This is a product of the hegemonies fractal construction where one can construct the whole with smaller pieces of the same structure - not important to think about just know the inverted zone is structural, it represents the perspective from service-to-self, the functional 3rd density

Now, place the basket of fruit on the map and put them on the perceptual good zones, this should feel like a different sense of good and bad. For me I describe the perceptual zone as a stale quality, the point is that it now feels more ‘right’ to place the basket on the right hand side as opposed to the left

This is why people vote against their interests

The hegemony was discovered while developing free energy policy and development of an understanding of things by redefining the political compass into a question of “Who does this idea benefit” on a spectrum from everyone to only me

[Alisru]

People can only ‘see’ as far as they know, they can only detect things that are similar to the things they hold, that are similar in type to their senses, one can only detect information they believe is possible and impossible, so with a limited worldview of information service to self makes more sense. Really however this STS is rationalized as service to group, which is ultimately service to individual, it’s creating a conceptual wall of nutrients for service to self to feed from. Service to a single other creates a conceptual wall of nutrients that service to others feeds from. Ideas to solve problems can take root on either side, and if the solution doesn’t begin developing then the conceptual egg never gets fertilized, the problem cannot be solved so it ejects nutrients for both as an epistemic period, since what was there wasn’t working

You can think but also know in your core, where good or bad things have been rationalized as the opposite

Consciousnesses, sovereign entities are information structures, everything you know, are, have done, and will potentially do exists as an ordered structure as the map that you’ve explored relative to the objective field of information.The hegemony is an infinite and dynamic map of everything that defines you relative to others, and everything else. Simply an ordering principle of the mind, a geometry of definition

It puts a whole different spin on things like talking about ones face, if one is an information structure then in your geometry of definitions you present certain faces

Anyway, there’s much more to be said on what the hegemony is and why you can feel it, the point is that it’s a tool for discernment that’s incorruptible, impossible to use for evil without saying its being used for evil ultimately.

You can see it as something drawn to defend others “Let the first to harm another be the one he who is perfectly good” because if you harm another you become bad and not good

[Raz]

(post deleted by author)

[Alisru]

Good in this context is the expansion of potential available option space of things that ‘thing’ ‘can be’ over an arbitrary amount of time

Bad is the contraction of options over time

Evil is the termination of a good process before its natural completion

Words are simply labels for processes, and this is getting away from the point and overcomplicating it

Bad is putting your hand in fire.

Pray that we all agree that holding your hand in fire is objectively bad. Then we can see isomorphic fire or different kind of fires that are generators of distortion that take a thing as fuel and turn it into what its not, where hatred is a fire that burns love and goodwill and the fire of love burns hatred and aggression

This isn’t using whatever definition you hold in your mind for good and bad, but the definition relative to your body

@Raz

functional or dysfunctional, sustainable or unsustainable

Exactly, morality is relative to viability

This is the simple activity dynamics underlying the hegemony

[Raz]

@Alisru

Words are simply labels

Agreed. Words are wonderful tools for navigation, communication, and focus—yet symbolic language itself is part of the very mystery we apply it to.

I do, however, find that mapping the dynamics of our probable self tends to become stifling in the long run. Divorced from an environmental context (physical body included), rigid conceptual maps can be quite stagnating to live by.

I’ve come to a point where I prefer letting the dynamics of self unfold on their own terms, adjusting as best I can to the ebb and flow of our unavoidable growth.

Having said that, I still find conversations like these uplifting to participate in from time to time