Session 31.6: Fertilisation

You say that you are in the position of “patriarch” and want to control her in a sense. And you say that “this is the point of the traditions where the men controlled the women a great deal”. So speaking now as a so-called feminist, I want to inform all men that women do not need men to be protective over them and control them. I am morally against people sleeping around casually. But I know that these are just my own convictions and I want everyone (both men and women) to have the right to have their own moral compass and convictions. If these women are sleeping around a lot in their 20s, well guess what, the 20 year-old men are also doing the same thing. If men can do it and are not castigated for it, a woman should also not be told that she cannot do it. I respect everyone’s free will as long as it does not infringe on someone else to the extent that it results in rape, murder or some other serious offense. I think that men sleep around far more often than women do and for longer in their lifespan. They also have a higher number of sexual partners in their lifetimes than women on average do. Why is it OK for a man. It is becoming more rare these days, but there are still women out there who will not have sex before marriage. Far fewer men actually fit into this category.

In an idealistic world, every child would have both a mother and a father. The mother and father would instill morals and loving discipline in their children so that the children would not leave the house and become sexually promiscuous, get into drugs, or do other things that are harmful towards their life. If the mother and father both model these behaviors that they want from their children in their own relationship, then in this idealistic world, the children will not depart from what they have been taught. If a child does stray and become rebellious, then yes, it is painful for the parents to have to witness this, but they have already taught their child the right way to live so now they just have to let their adult child have their own free will and live their own life. This individual obviously is choosing to learn their lessons the hard way. If the child comes back to you like in the story of the prodigal son, you should welcome them back with open arms and unconditional love.

I also do not agree with you saying that your sister “should take her life seriously and attempt to move up in social status” by marrying young and having children. Yes, she does need to take her life seriously, but why does she need to move up in social status. If she finds a wonderful man who treats her well but he happens to be a sanitation worker, then I think she should find no shame in being with him. The only reason to get into a relationship to raise your social status is if you only care about yourself, money, or how you are perceived by others. Yes, her life and her future children’s lives would be easier and more comfortable if she married a man that had more money. But as far as marrying and having children while you’re young, WHY? A lot of women don’t fully know who they are until after the age of 25, and even then they don’t really fully know themselves until they are in their 30s. You have reflected this yourself by saying that a lot of women in their 30s will finally try to settle down. A man who gets married to a woman in her 20s will find out that she is not the same woman that she was when she reaches her 40s. Age changes everyone’s perspectives on life. I have a very close friend who got married at the age of 20 and had four children by the time she was 26. She absolutely loves her children, but she mentions to me and her other friends all of the time how much she wished she had never gotten married so young or had children. She wishes she had delayed her child-bearing by 7-10 years. She feels like she never got to live her life, and she went from being a child herself to then raising children. As a mother, once you have children, you are no longer the priority. Your children come first for at least the next 18 years. You are on duty 24/7 ,365 days a year times 18 years and never get a break. I have 13 nieces and nephews and I have been around a lot of young children. Young children will not let their mothers even have the time to go to the bathroom by themselves without interrupting them. Why not take the time for yourself in your 20s, and then when you are ready to settle down in your 30s, have your family. Personally, from the relationships that I have observed, the majority of the relationships where people get married in their 20s tend to end up in divorce because they were too immature at the time and did not fully know their partner. People who wait later and get married in their 30s and then start having children tend to have a more successful, long-term relationship. But the people who wait until their 40s to get married for the first time in their life have generally waited too long. If they do find someone to marry, this 40 year old person is already so set in their ways that it is very hard for them to accommodate living in the same house with another person when they have not done that for 40 years.This is just my own opinion, it may not be correct or based on fact.

You can give your sister your opinion, but then let her live her own life. Free will must always be respected. We do not need patriarchal rules to try to “protect “women. Yes, women do want and need to feel protected by their fathers and their husbands, but this should be done in a way that it does not infringe upon their own free will. You can tell them that dressing provocatively, or hanging out in a dangerous area may not be the smartest or safest thing to do, but it needs to be left up to them to follow that advice. If a woman truly respects her father or her husband, she would not be placing herself in dangerous situations where she would need to be protected and controlled. If I lived in an unsafe area, and I felt that I might be raped by just walking out on the streets, then I would appreciate my father, brother, or husband walking with me to make sure that I am safe. These types of protective measures I am OK with.

I should not have let down my guard with you. I really really shouldn’t. Answering your points now would involve further opening up and explanation to someone like you. I should have moved in for the kill after your last post.

Wow, so do you think in the decades of red pill thought they have not thought about this. I have seen this argument so many times and it doesn’t matter how many times it is responded to, it comes back unmodified. Like the wage gap.

As in the original chart. Did you even see it? This pattern is pretty much every woman. But it is a very small percentage of men. Not 20 year olds likely because as I said before, many of that age group of men are still virgins. These are the very rich and often older men.

Telling men about these patterns “for the good of women”. (Because womens choices is always mens fault if you can’t take any responsibility). Won’t work because most men don’t do these things. And the ones that are moving through women like a fat woman through tubs of ice cream, will not be the ones to listen. And, their choices are working for them most likely.

The choice, in the end, doesn’t work for the woman. It works for the small amount of men that are doing this. They will settle down and have kids fine.

So, what you are saying from this position is that even if your opinion is wrong, and probably not moral. So it is not positive and hence, you holding it could have a negative effect on your polarity and the lives of those around you. You are still going to hold onto it?

Well, at this point, why would I have a discussion with someone that is not moral?

I don’t feel that my opinions are wrong, and I know in my heart that they feel true to me. Therefore, I am not concerned with my morality at all. I have lots of flaws, but my opinions on these matters are not one of them. Therefore, I think we should just both agree to disagree.

Yes, well, feelings are not a legitimate determinant of reality. I feel x is reality so it is is the definition of narcissism. Below are statistics on one of my many DEI points: Native vs. Foreign born workers in the US since the lockdown.

Foreign born workers gained 4.4 million jobs and American born workers lost 833k jobs in the same period:

https://cis.org/Camarota/New-January-Data-Still-Shows-Most-Job-Growth-Going-Immigrants-88-2020-72-last-year

In relation to my sister and that argument in general. A few thoughts. No one said it was fair. Women have an unbelievable amount of attention in their twenties. If they make mistakes in their twenties then it effects the rest of their lives. Men get to make mistakes in their twenties. But that is biology. Until we have longer lifespans that will not change.

Nevertheless, it IS what it is. As I have explained it. From a guys perspective if a girl has been “having fun” in her twenties and is going to pine after the guy that she now can’t get that her sexual market value is not as high. He doesn’t have to wife her up in her thirties. There are two people in that interaction. After a woman has “had fun” in her twenties she probably isn’t going to be sexually adventurous anymore she has done it all. 1/3rd of marriages over the age of 40 are sexless.

Women do a LOT of social shaming to try and get men to wife up those sorts of girls. That is where the service to self comes in.

But yes, not that much more to say.

I don’t owe my sister anything to be honest. I have made a lot of effort to get to know her and she has pushed off every time. A lot of the elements that are relevant to our future are not able to be predicted. If I suddenly got money and got famous or something, I have no doubt she would contact me tomorrow. And I have no doubt I would ignore her. She seems to be basically out for herself.

For starters, I would like to say that this is going to be the last post that I am going to make on this particular thread.

You say that “yes, well, feelings are not a legitimate determinant of reality”, and again, I have to disagree. I think that someone’s feelings will absolutely determine the reality that they live in for them. I will give an example. I had a former female coworker, who was the most sensitive person that I have ever met in my entire life. Her feelings got hurt by absolutely everything. The things that hurt her feelings were to a “normal”person, the most ridiculous things ever. When she first started working the same shift that I was on, she found a group of three females that included myself who would listen to her go on and on about how so and so hurt her feelings. We would all try to explain to her how she should not let something like that upset her and she was misinterpreting the situation, and that is not what that other person meant. Because she continued to have these conversations with us multiple times a day, whenever her feelings got hurt, the other women finally got sick of it, and they would avoid her. This then hurt her feelings, and every time she saw the other two women standing together, she automatically assumed that they were talking about her. She would tell me that every time she walked into a room, they would immediately stop talking, which confirmed to her that they were talking about her. Every time she felt like one of these incidents happened, she would run off into a corner and start crying. People would run back in to the common work area that a lot of people shared to report that they would see her standing in a corner crying. Several times she was even seen out in the main hallways, staring off into space and crying. These incidents started to happen more and more, and the time that she stared off into space became more and more so that she started attracting the attention of people from other departments. Eventually, some of my coworkers had enough, and they would tell our supervisor on her. Several times he would have to come down to the emergency department and send her home for the day. People were wondering why she had not been fired yet. She finally confessed to me that she had FMLA and thus was protected. When she would come back to work after spending some time off, she found that her feeling that people were constantly talking about her was now actually reality. People were constantly talking about her, and they would shut up when she entered the room. At that point, I was the only one that would still talk to her because I felt sorry for her and recognized that she had a true mental illness that she did not need to be ridiculed for. I tried to talk to her in a subtle and kind way (because I knew how she was) about getting cognitive behavioral therapy help and anxiety medication for help with these feelings that she was having, but she seemed to disregard my advice in that area. She was completely unable to see that she had a problem in that area and instead blamed the other people for just being mean to her. Then I could tell that her feelings were starting to get upset by me implying that she might have a mental health disorder. She would insist over and over that she did not have a mental health disorder and that she did not need to go to a psych ward. She would say, why do people keep saying this to me. She eventually quit because she felt that all of the other coworkers were so antagonistic towards her that it became an unbearable situation for her to go to work in. And in fact, it was now reality because the other coworkers wanted her out so badly that they were no longer veiling their dislike towards her. But the point to the story is that because her feelings were so overwhelming in her, her feelings became her reality. In this illusion that she is living in in her current incarnative state, she has created a condition for herself, where her feelings are absolutely her reality. Her feelings are not the reality of other peoples, but she is stuck in this reality based on her own feelings that is absolutely real to her.

I would like to make another point. In a much earlier post, you said “Right, so you are saying that the police officers coming in are real world men that have had to deal with violent criminals and they have a poor opinion of certain races”. You also made a statement concerning DEI in your most recent post above about foreign born workers vs native born workers. And I believe that you asked me in an earlier post if I was OK with immigrants taking jobs away from my own countrymen. My response about these immigrants, foreign born workers, and violent criminals from certain races is that in fact, you are them, and they are you, if you believe in the law of one, which I do. I believe that every single one of these groups of people, you and I both, as well as everything else in creation, are all different cells that are living inside of the Original Creator’s consciousness. So when I think about these seeming others from that point of view, I don’t have as much of a problem with it as others seem to do. This world that we are both currently living in right now is but a small moment in time. It will end and the seeming problems in it will end. Eventually, everyone will make spiritual progress and evolve, and merge back into the One.

Lastly, I would like to apologize to you if I have made you angry, upset, irritated, or hurt your feelings in anyway because of the perspectives that I have shared here, and feel are true to me. I understand that my perspectives are not your perspectives that you justly feel are true to you. So I ask your forgiveness if I have done any of that to you, and I forgive you as well for any statements that you have made that I might have perceived to have offended me.

2 Likes

Sorry, this will be my last post. There was one more thing that I forgot to include in my post above and that is my advice to you. My advice is that you do not always have to like your sister, but you should try to love her always. Because of the way that she treats you, you do not need to have a relationship with her if it is not beneficial to you, but you still should have feelings of love for her in your heart and hope that she will change.

1 Like

That’s a great way of putting it :green_heart::dove:

2 Likes

Finally someone realizes that we are more than instruments in a game of polarities. I thought I was the only one who didn’t like this whole law of one thing, but according to RA, we are free to agree or not, allowing for disagreements, in theory.

This is not a real apology imo. This is a “holier than thou” apology. Similar to how Christian women say “I’ll pray for you” before plotting your downfall via gossip.

If you cared, even remotely what I thought or felt. Then when I said something, recounting my experience with my sister, and you moral highgrounded immediately afterward. You would have some curiousity as to why I then got upset about it. Because anyone would if they had legitimate empathy. If I say something to someone and they get angry I’d ask why that was. I also would have made an effort, if someone tells me something, to not moral highground in the first place.

What you are doing is known as “female intersexual competition”. It’s really designed for other women. Men are meant to be out hunting. But it’s just a process of pretending to be more “good” than the other person so you are supported by the tribe. Of course the true version of that competition doesn’t allow for virtue signalling. But we live in a fallen world where many women substitute different tactics for genuine virtue.

This also extends to your selective empathy in general. You are not virtuous by supporting immigration and open borders. You are just allowing the state to justify taxation. I.e. the welfare state, and cheap immigrant labour with no labour laws. You obviously don’t have empathy for the MANY Americans who are very upset that their tax has been used for this purpose. I have seen threads of them, enraged at USAID while they had to bring up children and couldn’t afford things for them.

Just like you want men to subsidise womens choices in their twenties. Empathy is selective. You don’t care about unjust marriage laws otherwise you wouldn’t support feminism. And also, divorces and stuff come from the dynamics I have described.

Empathy for who I like and who serves my personal need for power via virtue signalling is not empathy. Selective empathy such as that. Even Hitler had empathy for people he liked.

A true understanding of the Law of One means EVERYONE. Not just the groups that make it easier to virtue signal while exploiting through violence another group (i.e. the tax base).

I don’t quite know what you mean by this. I went to the posts you ‘liked’. But my outlook is very tied to the real world and what can actually be applied and stuff. Thanks for the compliment.

1 Like