Does transition between densities change personality?

Strictly Law of One
1

This thought came to me because of several fragments in the text:

25.7 Questioner: Very important point, I believe. Does a portion of the Confederation then engage in this thought battle? What percentage engages?

Ra: I am Ra. This is the most difficult work of the Confederation. Only four planetary entities at any one time are asked to partake in this conflict.

25.8 Questioner: What density are these four planetary entities?

Ra: I am Ra. These entities are of the density of love, numbering four.

25.9 Questioner: Then I am assuming this is the most effective density for this work. Would this density— an entity of this density— be more effective for this type of work than, say, an entity of density five or six?

Ra: I am Ra. The fourth density is the only density besides your own which, lacking the wisdom to refrain from battle, sees the necessity of the battle. Thus it is necessary that fourth-density social memory complexes be used.

“which, lacking the wisdom to refrain from battle, sees the necessity of the battle”

That is, as I understand it, the 4 best entities from the vibration of love are taken, probably the highest ones, which are capable of effectively waging this battle. But why don’t these same entities understand that there’s no need to fight? Why don’t they also abstain, like the 5th and 6th densities? It feels like something happens to consciousness at the junction between densities, or does it somehow change, and the entity significantly alters its thinking? Maybe I’m wrong?

36.15 Questioner: Well, then let’s say that when Himmler, for instance, reaches sixth-density negative at the beginnings of sixth-density negative, at this time would it be [the] case that an entity would realize that his higher self is sixth-density positively oriented and for that reason make the jump from negative to positive orientation?

Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. The sixth-density negative entity is extremely wise. It observes the spiritual entropy occurring due to the lack of ability to express the unity of sixth density. Thus, loving the Creator and realizing at some point that the Creator is not only self but other-self as self, this entity consciously chooses an instantaneous energy reorientation so that it may continue its evolution.

The fifth density of negativity is wise, but for some reason it lacks the obviousness to see what sixth-density entities see. So, is it simply lacking wisdom? Or is the transition to the sixth level or density marked by a shift in consciousness, which provides the necessary impetus to realize that all is one and “stop engaging in negativity”? Simply put, why must one wait until sixth density to understand certain things? This baffles me. It’s as if there’s an invisible barrier to understanding, something so obvious that entities miss it. But what is this then? Perhaps this path through the densities leads them to a place so subtle that it simply physically cannot support negativity This reminds me of the analogy I had when I would have moments in my dreams where I would become a limited version of myself, like acting naive and stupid in my sleep, and then waking up I would think to myself, “What the hell is this?” Perhaps this is the shedding of unnecessary fluff that Ra spoke of.

2

Your inquiry is about personality, but in my view, you will strike closer to the truth if you look at this in terms of feelings. In 3D, our feelings are wimpy because we lack a direct connection with our deeper selves. But when a 4D+ entity sees suffering–and sees a means to alleviate that suffering–its feelings of compassion may simply countermand what you are considering to be a more sensible response.

I suspect that something similar applies to the 6D- being. At some point it feels right to grow into a fuller version of self, in alignment with its deepest feelings. Personally, I consider it just part of the normal growth process.

This was one of the final questions I put to Q’uo in a session 20 years ago. They chose not to say much about it.

J

Why is it that fourth and fifth-density negative beings don’t work in conjunction with their higher selves to see where the negative path leads and then switch over to the other polarity? This would seem to be so much more efficient! Is it fondness for the game, the enjoyment of feeling strong, inflowing, apparently fulfilling energies and fear of annihilation or interminable misery that keep them enthralled in their mischief?

Q’uo

We are those of Q’uo, and are aware of your query, my brother. And, indeed, we find that you have offered many fine answers to your own question. Therefore, since this instrument’s energies are waning at this time, we would ask for another query before we leave this instrument.

1 Like
3

I have a question for you, oh Mirror friend: where are you? 3D, 4D… 256D? :melting_face:
And do you think that where you consider yourself to be has any actual influence over where you truly are?

4

I don’t really know. But I do resonate with Q’uo’s idea that I am exploring the balance of love and wisdom for the purpose of unifying my innumerable levels consciousness. What you are responding to in your question is just that, I would say, the feeling of this effort. I’ve come a long way in 20 years.

From the session cited above…

J

I find in myself a strong affinity for higher-density planes of both polarities and information about them. This and other things have led me to believe that I have wandered through higher-density planes, both positive and negative, and then chosen to hop back into the maelstrom of third density. Could you please verify this and discuss the phenomenon of individuals exploring both polarities into higher densities? Could this be merely a grand way of deferring true polarization?

Q’uo

We are those known to you as the principle of Q’uo, and are aware of your query, my brother. We tread close to the limits of free will as we respond to this question. In our opinion—and we offer it for what it is worth—the pattern which you describe is that of a sixth-density wanderer whose fifth-density experiences were felt by the sixth-density entity to have too marked an effect upon the basic ground of being which is represented by the pallid word “love” and by the activity of the student of fourth density in realizing fully…

[Side one of tape ends.]

…the depths of that ground of being. The Thought that created all that there is was not a thought of wisdom. It was pure, unconditional, love. Consciousness is a Thought which creates and destroys the universe. That consciousness is a consciousness of love.

I find it interesting that I asked about polarity and they responded in terms of consciousness.

To your question, no, I wouldn’t say that even informed speculation about my vitae is nearly as influential on my self-training as the act of simply following my inherent creative drive. On the other hand, I do believe that the work I am now beginning does have a direct benefit to my soul stream, in the sense that I am beginning to allow it more direct interplay in my life, now that I have cleared away endless heaps of personality-level obstacles to the flow of divine energy within me.

3 Likes
5

Thank you for sharing that session and your reflection, Mirror.

Polarity reminds me of the dynamic in professional wrestling. In the ring, you have the “Face” (the good guy) and the “Heel” (the bad guy). The entire show relies on an unspoken rule called “kayfabe”—the agreement that everyone involved will pretend the rivalry and the personas are 100% real.

Polarity is essentially cosmic kayfabe.

Swallowing the idea of polarity is polarizing in itself, keeping us locked into the drama of the Face and the Heel. But behind the scenes, in the locker room, the good guy and the bad guy aren’t enemies; they are colleagues working together to put on a compelling show. Polarity acts as a theatrical story element.

Thank you for your efforts Mirror, I see you, I feel you, your presence is a Lighthouse on this plane. Thank you for supporting the rest of us in avoiding the Rocks with the love you facilitate :purple_heart:

2 Likes
6

I thank you for your kind words.

I agree with your take on polarity, especially for someone like yourself who is not primarily driven by the subconscious, but can freely choose either one modality or another to suit the feel of the moment. However, that really only applies to life lived in the lower three energy centers. as I see it.

In order to explore the breadth of what the heart center, throat center and brow center have to offer, in my opinion, strong dedication is required. One needs to purify the inner desire, and this is referred to as polarity because it empowers the seeking. You can separate it from the positive/negative biases, if you like, and view it as moving more deeply into self-awareness.

I just thought I’d throw that out onto the table here. I’m not trying to alter your opinion.

2 Likes
7

That’s a helpful distinction, Mirror, and I gladly welcome it on the table :slight_smile:

I acknowledge the difference between ‘polarity as drama’ (the theatrical conflict of the lower centers) and ‘polarity as compatibility’ with, from our perspective, “Higher” realms. Viewing it as the purification and balancing of desire rather than a positive/negative bias resonates with me. It adds a sense of nuance to the kayfabe analogy.

I would like to point out that my opinions are fleeting—they come and go depending on need and relevance. I generally operate from a state of observation, navigating the probable haze I find myself inhabiting as I tend the circulation between inner and outer.

2 Likes
8

I will just add that purifying the will to serve eventually opens up new avenues of creative exploration. So long as a person is hazy about they truly wish to explore, the path forward is obscured. As the depth of desire to serve (perhaps simply by exploring the totality of consciousness) becomes more deeply felt and understood, your spirit guides are more able to show you new things.

2 Likes
9

agreed, observation gives space for our deeper will to rise, sprouting intentions that bloom, wilt, and nourish what we may intend next

3 Likes
10

I agree with you, Raz, on our Mirror friend…

The issue of polarity somewhat fades with me when I think, very basic here, that we are all in the same boat…lol

(apt thought for a frog, after all )

3 Likes
11

That’s not true :face_with_tongue: Everyone is in their own boat. We don’t share boats, each of us is in our own when it comes to our individual experiences and growth. And that’s actually better: What we should take into account is that the other person in their own boat is, in reality, ourselves, that there is no difference between us. The mind, consciousness, the spirit, it is one and the same in the person on one boat and the person on another boat. The same inner being exists in two people at once, even while they’re on two separate boats and are two separate individuals.

If people are talking from two separate boats, they’re actually speaking to themselves. Not in a physical sense, that would be false, but in a metaphysical sense. I am, in truth, speaking to myself right now when I’m speaking to you, we have the same deep self within us. The physical body is different, your appearance is different from mine, and you differ from one another as well. Your physical predispositions, your personality, your temperament, this personality in the third density that manifests in physical form, is different and separate. But in truth, the deep mind is shared by us, it is the same higher mind. The conscious mind of the Creator! :slight_smile:

This perspective is very helpful in coming out of various situations and polarizing positively.

2 Likes
12

I think so too. When you really think about it, at least that is what I was reflecting on yesterday, basically every so called “attack” from STS is actually a great opportunity for growth, because it only affects you if you fall out of love and awareness. But if you are truly aligned with your higher self and the Creator, you start to notice that each such situation in a way already pushes you toward STO… Essentially, you can end up beneath it or rise above it. I mean being below it or above it in relation to that “attack” from STS. An “attack” can easily turn into support if you have the right perception of what is happening and the right motivation. The Creator is a genius when it comes to His/Her Plan.

2 Likes
13

Speaking to the topic question, are personality distinctions observable between 2nd and 3rd densities? If so, might personality distinctions be expected between 3rd and 4th, etc?

But speaking to the discussion, I’ve been pondering the idea of spiritual mass, namely an increase in spiritual mass as potentially upleveling 6th density evolution. I think this nomenclature seems somewhat of a physical metaphor. That is, there may be a sub-octave of progression within densities, generally speaking, where less evolved starting states might get be described as less dense and finishing states might be described as more dense. Then the idea of less density may correspond analogously to not having enough spiritual mass to graduate onward.

A 6th density social memory complex might be thought of as a network of individuals sharing energies via relationships. The choice of polarization likely influences how relationships were managed leading up to early 6th density experience. The act of wandering back to lower density affords growth catalyst that accelerates the sub-octave progression, it promotes the aggregation of spiritual mass. For example, an efficiently positive polarized progression might need to back-fill some degree of negative perspective in order to better interface relationship wise with negative progressed counterparts.

There’s likely many examples of wanderers who jump in the fry pan amongst high density negatives and gain experience and tolerance in how to cope, if that’s even possible. I conjecture this can be a reason wanderers might be observed in somewhat uncomfortable circumstances.

As the spiritual mass of a social memory complex increases, its degree of compatibility likely improves without risk of karmically jeopardizing its evolutionary progression. I would expect that evidence of interaction become more and more common. Might the pondering of such ideas align with a general desire to evolve, creating facilitation in ways beneficial?

2 Likes
14

This is a fascinating excerpt. It is interesting to note that there are no ‘negative’ Higher Selves, as I understand it. Every negative entity currently ‘engaged in negativity’ has already returned to the Light and Unity. Their future version exists simultaneously in this very moment. In this game, it is impossible to lose or to truly go the wrong way.

This leads me to believe that it is only an entity’s perception that creates limitations. An entity might enjoy ‘eating the forbidden apple,’ and for them, that constitutes happiness; negative entities surely have their own definition of joy. In fact, I wouldn’t even categorize entities as positive or negative, since the ultimate destination—Unity—is the same for each and every one of us.

Consequently, I’ve concluded that this is simply a game where you choose a side, yet the choice itself is essentially meaningless. What does it matter whether you choose light or darkness? It is better to simply listen to your feelings. I suspect most entities are just following their own ‘truth’—for instance, the belief that Creation is flawed, or that some beings are inherently more useful than others. Since there is only one path leading toward Light and Unity, and it is impossible not to arrive there, the best course is to follow your own internal truth.

What is the ultimate takeaway? I believe everyone has their own truth. You can find like-minded people, but if 99% of the population believes that bananas grow on trees, does that make them right? One can choose to be that 1% (the ‘negativity’) and still seek their own truth. I see freedom in that. I am not trying to be perfect. I don’t suppress my anger or my aversion to certain things. I simply strive for the highest degree of sincerity with myself—to admit to myself exactly who I want to be in relation to other beings and events. Yeah.

1 Like
15

Yes, I think that’s most probably what I really meant with my same boat assumption, lol

But I didn’t formulate that as precisely , lol

1 Like
16

Yeah, no problem. :slight_smile: It’s also a matter of interpretation. Even though I’m not a native speaker, I more or less understand that those kinds of expressions shouldn’t be taken too literally. I mostly used the situation as an opportunity to expand on the topic and explain my point of view. Because overall, there are definitely contexts and interpretations where I completely agree with you. :smiling_face_with_three_hearts:

1 Like
17

I liked your ‘expansion’ K !!!

1 Like