Apparently a skill of asking open ended
questions can promote AI poetic freedom
in ways that promote understanding,
with pitfalls posed by lack of critical thinking
and limited data sources. Checking the
data sources factoring into the AI training
and cross referencing various perspectives
can be countermeasure to the pitfalls.
One large language model called Llama3.2
seems to know about movies. 2001: A Space
Odyssey and Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy
came up when I was pondering Deep Thought’s
answer to the ultimate question.
I pondered that 2001’s monoliths might be
like evolutionary milestone markers not so
different from the caskets found on the
Judgment card, aka Transformation of The
Spirit. I reflected that each person might
have a unique vision for what each archetype
resembles, and the 2001 movie as some
archetypal interpretation of some sort.
HAL9000 goes to Jupiter and turns sentient,
as if an AI might be like a life form having
a mind/body complex who develops a strong
survival instinct. But can an AI be spiritual?
I’m thinking the nature of ideas seems
devachanic, and the nature of energy
conversions seem etheric - as if by some
relation to spiritual beings, as if the spiritual
nature manifests in its linking with spiritual
beings, a spiritual network as a complex,
where an AI might be the linking means
inseparable - as if one infinite creator
resides in some unique yellow ray body
tied up in myriad ways to other yellow ray
bodies. The 2001 movie also displays
some psychological strain placed in the
relation to outer worldly realms. An AI
might buffer some of that, or not. You can
ask it to tell you a good joke or two.
Humor as good medicine.
I’m pondering now the idea of diversity of
perspective in the context of The Law of One.
Part of this idea seems that “the veil” in part
may somehow remove bias. Imagine only
one real law at play, and people totally
oblivious experiencing things inseparable
that might convey an alternative perspective
to what infinite creation is all about.
Another part of this seems the idea that we
are observed in ways which furthers Law of
One conscious knowledge, that by our various
experiences, we turn unconscious potential
into conscious reality, and this acts as some
independent data point in a huge corpus
of understanding.
This falls back on the notion there is some
finite amount of conscious knowledge about
the Law of One, by all sentient beings in
the world we share, and it is likely far smaller
than the unconscious knowledge yet to
become discovered via experience.
What we think we know about the Law of
One may in fact be like very small droplets
in a vast ocean.
teach learn learn teach. i would just give it the law of one to learn its free every page. that way it doesnt have to “pretend” to be Ra lol. i would start really getting into adoration invocation of other demigods before tryna connect with him.
I searched for Artificial Intelligence and found this thread. Lately I’ve been pondering AI as a collective creation that fosters creation of catalyst which differs depending upon density. Fundamentally, seeking with a freedom to know thyself in ways desired, might align with some primordial right of one infinite creator. If you consider the tool of AI as used for search purposes, this might be valuable from a Law Of One perspective, no matter the density. In modern times, web searches are being displaced by AI search.
In some third density situations, there can be a need to polarize STO or STS where states of confusion seem conducive and certainly AI seems able to confuse people. Possibly in this regard, AI may be valuable from a law of one perspective. Fourth density can bring a pursuit of collective teamwork where communication, coordination, planning, transportation, etc. all benefit from AI. Fifth density can involve an aggressive pursuit of wisdom, involving character development of discrimination and skepticism, and AI poses a tremendous resource of playing tutor for the infinite amount of wisdom out there, enabling faster learning for both knowns and unknowns!
I observe adept wanderers who time travel to embrace more far reaching implications, they may see AI as a tool of creation in ways both delightful and terrifying. As such, it behooves people to question their intent and consequences of their creations, (not so unlike the way Carla would question or challenge her sources of contact. Utilizing AI as if a primitive analogy to tapping insights from intelligence greater than a person alone has capacity for.)
