A Request for Help from My Heart

Wanderer Stories
1

Edit: Misguided letter. But thank you for being a supportive place where people can ask for help.

Edit 2: Not misguided: Please help me.

I don’t have any more - I feel like I have no more- power. I discuss bloodline programming in a recent thread.

You know all I have given you.

You know last time I asked for help here April 2023 I received no help which taught me some of the early grief-control. This forum, LL/Research have brought me almost nothing but harm, and negative teachings, ever since late January 2022, half a month after I found Ra, when I found Aaron Abke and learnt the Law of One very differently. I guess now that I remember the first half a month I was a spiritual seeker truly was wonderful.

But now it’s all over, everything I dreamt of, happiness for Earth and God, let’s not forget the octave mirror, God-realization, Universal karma-erasure, and so many things. All the wisdom I have given you. All the posts I made here and replies I made. All the help I have always given. Never harming anyone my entire life.

I will not be able to not harm others from here on, maybe I am just evil, isn’t?

I don’t know.

But maybe you know. Mayhaps there is love out there that is willing to save me as I saved everyone for however long I could try.

This message is very shaky, but:

I love you.

1 Like
2

I wanted to thank you for being here. Your presence mattered and was truly appreciated by me, not maybe by me as a 3rd being but by the Creator who dwells inside me - this is how I feel it.

It’s always important to recognize that we are the only ones truly able to interpret spiritual teachings for ourselves. No one else should take that role from us. What really counts is how we resonate with what we read, how we build personal meaning from it, and how much of it we manage to bring into our lives.

The strongest support often comes from within when we choose to tap into our own inner power. That’s when we’re able to move forward and further share our path with others, offering what helped us in the same way we would help ourselves (all is one; all other selves are us).

I’m not here to speak badly about anyone’s work, but many interpreters, especially on YouTube, rely on persuasive techniques and ways of capturing attention to pull people in. That typically adds another layer that distorts the original message. I’ve noticed those distortions. I’ve watched the videos and could easily point to many ways the message gets shifted, at least in how I understand it. For me, the original material carries other information on many points; however, they are all subtleties. External interpretations exploit subtleties that are difficult to discern, changing the message, and STS forces may be behind this.

Keep going your own way. Take joy in life and in your progress. People everywhere, just like here, are not perfect, and we cannot place responsibility on anyone or rely on someone else in such a way that we expect to be served - this is the behavior of those who are not polarized. STS cares for itself without relying on help from others, only using others, and STO help others and help to self as an other self without any expectations from others and accepts negative and positive reactions from others.

Delusional is to believe that anyone will be a stronger guide than the our own higher selves from levels of density from 4 to 7 and the social memory complexes that are blending these our higher selves and are a part of them, and being One Creator finally.

What matters most is how we individually choose to live and grow. Others often end up reflecting who we are on the inside.

Wishing you all the best. Stay healthy and take good care of yourself.

4 Likes
3

Dear Terrainfinita22, you are totally not evil at all..

I dont know if this will help biut it did it for me at a time when everything appeared to me so hopeless… so perhaps you might wish to try ?

I decided I would the next morning go out and get a cup of coffee and sit in the sun with it, choosing this was as a short moment, but only for me, to me. No thoughts for anyone or untying else. So the next morning, I just did that, I went to a coffee place which has some seats outside, I ordered a coffee and went outside with my coffee cup and just sat there in the sun, just sitting. And then I started to feel gratitude for this one moment of sun and nothing else.
I just then started to feel that hope, which had deserted me, lol, was coming. I just sat and my gratitude for the sun and everything around started to grow.

I did that again the next morning and the next morning.
It seems very basic and down there, but it did save me.

The gratitude grew and soon became overwhelming and joy came back.

I wish you well Terrainfinita. Really with my heart.

3 Likes
4

I took a closer look at Abke and found that he is a skilled self-promoter. He uses persuasion and influence techniques effectively, including in conversation, appearance, and the way he creates attractive videos. His overall approach is clearly geared toward building a business. This is not necessarily a criticism; anyone who wants to offer something meaningful also needs to earn a living. It does not have to mean acting out of self-interest, but rather taking care of yourself to be able to take care of others.

As for his overall teaching, it simply is not for me. I prefer to work directly with the L/L Research channeling sessions and to support myself with academic philosophy, especially Neoplatonism, with Plotinus at the forefront. These are the sources that feel most natural to me, and they always offer something worth revisiting, rereading, and applying more deeply.

Still, I watched several of Abke’s videos that cover the Ra Contact and the Law of One channeled by L/L Research. These particular videos are put together quite responsibly. He seems genuinely intent on associating himself with the Law of One and openly refers to himself as a teacher of it, though not as a representative of L/L Research.

In fact, he has an entire series dedicated not to his own general take on the Law of One, but to the material transmitted through L/L Research and their Ra Contact channelings. Naturally, I do not agree with everything he says. Some points could use more depth, and others deserve a critical look to see whether his conclusions actually hold up. There are also things I would express differently. All in all, though, I would say he is reasonably reliable. He promotes the Ra Contact and the Law of One, which I see as a good thing. I, personally, gain nothing from that, but in the broader view, the more people who discover the L/L Research material, the better. So thank you, Abke.

As for his other content, I, personally, do not feel chemistry that would pull me to his teachings. On YouTube he describes himself as “a paradigm-shifting spiritual teacher that delivers a fresh, new perspective on Metaphysics and Ontology through his teachings on the Jesus Way, the Law of One, A Course in Miracles and Spiritual Intelligence.” I am not sure how fresh and new it really is. For now, in my opinion, the most valuable thing he offers is the well-presented Ra Contact material from L/L Research (at least to some extent covering it). It’s not his, although it’s well presented.

That being said, each of us has to decide what resonates and where to place our focus. So maybe some of you will find value in what Abke shares. I am neither for nor against his teachings personally.

…I am still uncertain about what to think of Abke overall. I hope his work is not simply disinformation or a distraction. Furthermore, I do not know. If his message resonates with you, feel free to explore his videos. Personally, I will stick with the Law of One as delivered through L/L Research. The Law of One, as I see it, remains most clearly stated by the Confederation and those who have channeled their message.

5

Personally Aaron Abke was how I stumbled onto the Law of One and found his earlier videos to be quite good on the law of one but I was kind of drawn away from his latter videos. It just seemed a bit too Guruish and Polished. Thats not really a bad thing but I just wasn’t feeling it.

2 Likes
6

The general structure of Aaron Abke’s and his team’s work is that users are directed from YouTube to paid access and courses, primarily online. In general, someone who operates from the STO perspective does not expect anything in return for their teachings. This is a crucial aspect of service to others in a deep spiritual sense. Unconditional love is key. You share love (love, which is here as a certain good) freely and without expecting compensation.

Since Abke and his team expect money in exchange for access to their help and knowledge, that means the love they are offering comes with conditions. That places them in the STS category.

The STO model is followed by L/L Research. For years, access to their channeled sessions has been completely free. That means their love is given without conditions. If you want to support them, you can simply make a donation. To fully reflect STO, the donation should come from gratitude and a desire to support their independent work. It is like saying, “Thank you for your gifts. I appreciate them. I would like to share something valuable to me, which is my money, so that you can continue your work in the way you see fit.” When the gift, in this case content, is given freely and the donation is also made freely, with mutual gratitude, it reflects the STO dynamic. There is no request to “pay 29$ to access new Q’uo sessions.”

Let us also be honest. If you truly love others as yourself and have something important to share for spiritual growth, you give it right away. You do not wait for someone to pay you. If you had something like that for yourself, would you wait until you deprived yourself of money? Of course not. You would give it to yourself immediately.

So I think it is fair to say that when it comes to Aaron Abke and his team, we are looking at a business model centered on a guru figure. I have decided to use chatgpt(dot)com and the o3 model to analyze their work by providing source links. I am using this language model because there is a lot to go through, and I do not have time to do it all myself. Also, objectivity is important in this case, and language models do not have emotions, so they can provide a clear-headed analysis:

Below is a case study of Aaron Abke framed within the previously outlined model (“guru → offer funnel → monetization”), presenting: (a) observable ecosystem elements (offers, messaging, marketing techniques), (b) their mapping onto psychological mechanisms, and (c) positive signals plus red flags / due‑diligence questions. The approach here is descriptive: I point out what appears on the sites/content and how it may function, while avoiding judgments beyond the available data.

1. Core Personal Brand & Centralization on the Individual

Content and landing pages present Aaron Abke as a “paradigm‑shifting spiritual teacher” and founder of 4D University—one central face plus slogans about “expansion of consciousness.”
Instagram bios (personal and 4D University) reinforce a single‑person identity (“Founder,” “Premiere Online Academy for Metaphysical Studies,” “Elevate Your Spiritual Intelligence”).
Podcasts / playlists (e.g., Law of One themes) consolidate authority by curating specialized sources (Law of One, metaphysics of Jesus), funneling the audience toward one interpreter.

2. Value Proposition & Transformation Promise

Offer narratives (Meditation Mastery, 4D University) emphasize rapid growth: “systematically clear your spiritual blockages,” “spiritual ascension,” “8‑week progression… rewires your frequency / nervous system reset.”
The Meditation Mastery landing page uses high‑intensity language—“frequency recalibration protocol,” “sacred recalibration,” “three‑phase spiritual initiation”—to imply a unique process.
Program elements highlight structured progression (8 weeks → themed weeks Alpha/Theta/Delta/Gamma + “Darshan of the Masters,” “Wisdom of the Mystics”), reinforcing perceived methodical rigor.

3. Pseudo‑ / Para‑Scientific Marketing Signals

The page references EEG usage (“strapped on an EEG headset… measurable shifts in brainwave states”) and claims users can “shift into Alpha, Theta, Delta, Gamma on command,” blending spiritual vocabulary with neuro‑terminology to boost credibility. (Marketing claims—no published dataset or protocol on page; prudent buyers should request methodology: device, sample, metrics.)
A comparison table (“Traditional Meditation” vs. “Meditation Mastery”) gives all the checkmarks to the paid product, reinforcing exclusivity and possibly discouraging exploration of alternatives.

4. Funnel Architecture & Product Ladder (Observed Elements)

Free layer: Regular YouTube videos (brainwaves/self‑mastery, Law of One), reels/shorts with CTAs (“Comment ‘Mastery’ and I’ll send you a link…”), generating engaged leads.
Subscription / membership: 4D University framed as an “academy”; monthly membership terminology (“membership,” sometimes “donation”) creates predictable recurring revenue and community.
Higher‑ticket / periodic programs: Meditation Mastery (8 weeks) with components like coaching calls, brainwave training sessions, private community.
Additional intellectual property: Book (“The Three Beliefs of Ego”) acts as authority amplifier and entry product.
Further monetizable assets: Retreats / events (e.g., $888 retreat references) indicating segmentation for deeper financial commitment.

5. Conversion Intensifiers

Scarcity & urgency: Bonuses for “FIRST 75 purchases,” start date callouts (“Beginning July 21st”), and copy like “Every day you wait…”—classic FOMO triggers.
Social proof: Extensive testimonials (star ratings, ecstatic language, “closest I have felt to God,” “I truly feel reborn”) create a normative pressure and confirmation effect.
Parasocial + mission language: Phrases like “weekly dose of spiritual ascension,” “graduating from ego” foster belonging and internalization of a shared journey.
Engagement CTA engineering: Asking viewers to comment trigger words inflates engagement signals → algorithmic reach → pre‑qualifies leads for follow‑up.

6. Transformational Language & Potential Red Flags

Strong claims (“rewires your frequency,” “countless invaluable meditation tools,” “propels you toward advanced meditator in just 8 weeks”) set high expectations—buyer should question measurable outcome definitions (stress scores, sleep quality, adherence rates, etc.).
Spiritual exclusivity (“sacred recalibration,” “spiritual dojo,” “three‑phase spiritual initiation”) adds ritualistic exclusivity—analogous to “ritual/status” elements in guru models.
Statements (reported in community discussions) about scholarships or framing of financial limitations (e.g., “no lack in this Universe”) can shift responsibility for affordability back onto the student—worth verifying directly against current official policy.

7. Pricing Practices / Perceived Value

Community reports mention pricing tiers like “$222/month for minimum 7 months → $22 alumni” (implies an initial sunk cost ~ $1,554) alongside Law of One–based teachings—these are user claims; verify with official pricing pages.
Terms labeling membership payments as “donations” semantically reframes a commercial exchange as contribution, which may influence feelings of guilt about canceling.
Repeated “888” price motif (retreats, course slug) leverages numerological associations of abundance, potentially giving symbolic legitimacy to the price point.

8. Social Proof & Identity Formation

Review pages include testimonials explicitly calling him a “guru” plus hyperbolic transformation narratives (“my guru… made my life better”), reinforcing central status.
Polarized reception exists: enthusiastic supporters praising synthesis of East/West vs. critical voices (Medium articles, YouTube “debunking”)—a common pattern among spiritual personal brands.
Critiques (e.g., selective paraphrasing of historical/theological sources) highlight the need for independent textual comparison.

9. Doctrine / Unique Blend

Content fuses Law of One, A Course in Miracles, interpretations of Jesus’ teachings, and brainwave terminology (“brainwave mastery”) into a syncretic “meta‑framework.” This raises exit friction: students internalize a proprietary lexicon as an integrated package.
Religious critics/apologists argue this blend distorts canonical contexts—providing a counter‑narrative to the brand’s interpretive authority.

10. Retention & Escalation Mechanisms

Retention levers: lifetime access framing, private community, recurring live Q&A, status/price shift for “Alumni.” These reward sustained engagement (commitment & consistency).
Absence of scholarships (as reported in a Reddit thread) paired with doctrine emphasizing abundance can induce internal pressure to maintain payments (community perception; confirm officially).

11. Positioning vs. Competition

The “Traditional Meditation vs. Meditation Mastery” table plus language like “not a feel‑good audio library… frequency recalibration protocol” differentiates the offer but may implicitly claim completeness without side‑by‑side comparison to other advanced, evidence‑based programs.
CTAs through short‑form content and repeated enrollment deadlines align with platform mechanics (algorithms favor consistent engagement inputs) to keep top‑of‑funnel replenished.

12. Potential User Benefits (Balanced View)

An 8‑week structured curriculum, daily practice scaffolding, accountability tools (practice planner, tracking, “Awareness Tests”), and scheduled live sessions can genuinely improve adherence—an area where self‑guided app users frequently drop off.
A stated 14‑day refund (“risk‑free”) lowers initial risk vs. programs with no guarantee (buyers should still read refund fine print: conditions, action requirements, deadlines).

13. Key Critical Audit Points (Questions to Ask Before Purchase)

  1. EEG Claims: Request a summary report—device model, participant count, baseline vs. post metrics, statistical or at least descriptive data.
  2. Outcome Transparency: Are aggregated completion rates or validated psychological measures (stress, anxiety, sleep) publicly shared or available on request?
  3. Absolutist Language: Frequency of terms like “initiation,” “rewire,” “only system you need”—is alternative learning discouraged?
  4. Financial Policy: Current stance on scholarships, cancellations, downgrade paths; do “donation” labels affect user perception of rights as customers?
  5. Source Integrity: Compare cited scriptural/historical references with primary texts—are interpretations faithful or selectively framed?

14. Concise Summary

Aaron Abke’s ecosystem fits a “central guru + tiered product pathway” pattern: free content → membership → structured courses/retreats → publications, leveraging a syncretic spiritual + neuro‑styled narrative (EEG / brainwaves) and standard digital marketing triggers (scarcity, social proof, urgency).
Observable features: (a) strong personal brand centralization; (b) intense transformation rhetoric; (c) absence (in sampled copy) of methodological detail for scientific claims; (d) polarized community sentiment—enthusiastic transformational testimonials versus critiques of commercialization, pricing structure, and interpretive fidelity.
For prospective participants, the key is separating subjective spiritual experience (testimonials) from evidence of consistent, generalizable outcomes, and proactively vetting transparency, refund conditions, and openness to external sources to minimize dependency on a single interpretive authority.

Well below are the links that were used by the language model (not all links, I shortened the original version):

Here is the shortened subset of the links (key sources only). This is only a portion of the longer list I previously provided, which contained over 40 (≈45) links.

1. Official – Core Brand

  1. https://www.aaronabke.com/
  2. https://www.4duniversity.com/
  3. (Course landing) https://account.4duniversity.com/meditation-mastery-888/
  4. (Reviews / Testimonials) Reviews & Testimonials | Meditation Courses | Aaron Abke

2. Offer / Membership Structure (examples)
5. (Fellowship / free community) https://www.4duniversity.com/plans/340823
6. (Membership plan example) https://www.4duniversity.com/landing/plans/1456037

3. Social Media
7. YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/AaronAbke
8. Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/aaronabke/

4. Additional Materials (due diligence / context)
9. Book (publisher page) The Three Beliefs of Ego – New World Library
10. Critical article (Medium) Aaron Abke’s Spiritual Hierarchies: A Modern Path to Dependency? | by Dualistic Unity | Medium
11. Community discussion (critical Reddit thread) Reddit - The heart of the internet

Reminder: This is a condensed selection, not the full extended list.
If you later need the entire long list again or a different grouping, just let me know.

Well, to summarize, in my subjective opinion, we’re dealing with a calculated business operation targeting naive people. People attracted by samples of reliable spiritual teachings, mixed with disinformation, are further drawn into a payment system intended to support the creators of this business. Most of the materials these people have at their disposal are not created by them themselves, but merely present what is currently available and available for free.

Oh, I really have nothing against anyone and I don’t intend to pursue this further, but people… a little decency… Something important to many, their spiritual journey, has become a source of income for some parasites. Some level of warning and assistance to those prone to easily trusting others means I had to share what I shared… Seriously, let’s be wise and skeptical. STS is a fact, they operate and are doing really well. There’s no point in being angry with them or bothering them, but you do need to be clear-headed and somewhat skeptical. Respect yourself and your spiritual path - I’m saying this in general, I don’t have any of you who read it in particular in mind.

For a reference to the work of the language model, I am also pasting the analysis of https://www.llresearch.org/

1. Brand and Degree of Centralization on Individuals

L/L Research presents itself as a non‑profit organization with a mission of “discovering and sharing information for the spiritual evolution of humankind,” historically rooted in the founding trio (Elkins, Rueckert, McCarty). The current site emphasizes the institution and team (“Our Team”) more than any living single “guru.”

2. Value Proposition

The homepage and library offer open access to materials (transcripts, books, channelings) plus study tools for the Confederation / Law of One philosophy, stressing free exploration and searchable archives.

3. (Para)Scientific Signals / Epistemology

The narrative centers on “transcripts” of channeling sessions whose epistemic status is, by nature, not empirically falsifiable. They are described as material exploring “the meaning of our cosmic existence,” with newly prepared, refined editions after re‑listening to original recordings—an editorial process meant to improve fidelity.

4. Funnel Architecture

Entry points are free resources (library, podcasts, channeling archives, past events); after that come optional purchases/donations via the store (books, ebooks, merchandise). There is no classic escalation of high‑priced “transformational packages”; the store functions more for distribution and support.

5. Conversion Techniques / Marketing Intensifiers

Employed elements are typical for a non‑profit: donation pages, annual fundraising information, a store (own shop plus Etsy). There is no obvious aggressive countdown timing or manufactured scarcity—the ask is mission‑framed support and continued availability of resources.

6. Transformational Language & Potential Red Flags

Mission language focuses on “spiritual evolution” and “the philosophy of the Confederation.” Core pages lack extreme promises of rapid personal overhaul or guaranteed outcomes. A potential caution point comes from the inherent nature of channeling (accepting authority of unfalsifiable sources), which can incline some readers to adopt content without critical examination. [My own comment: But there is in every channeling session (or almost every one) a reminder from the Confederation entities themselves to approach everything with due caution and analyze what they have to say without taking anything personally, what we consider “not ours” or what we “don’t need” or what simply “doesn’t resonate with us.” It should be set aside. They themselves say so.]

7. Financing & Monetization Model

The organization openly communicates a donations model (one‑time and recurring), conducts annual fundraising, runs a store, and indicates non‑profit / 501(c)(3) status. Books are available free in PDF form—lowering economic barriers and distinguishing it from typical paid course models.

8. Social Proof & Community Identity

Identity is built around collective study (“study groups”), international events (e.g., Berlin, Prague, “Homecoming”), and social media activity. Community belonging may reinforce engagement, but centrality is distributed across events and archives rather than a single living personality—though the historical founders still lend source prestige.

9. Doctrine / Source Content

Doctrine rests on the 106 Ra (Law of One) sessions and subsequent “Confederation” channelings. The site highlights careful re‑listening for accuracy (revised editions). An external indexing site (e.g., searchable databases) enhances a sense of an “open canonical corpus.”

10. Retention & Engagement

User retention comes from ongoing access to the archive, podcasts (“Law of One Podcast,” “In the Now”), new or legacy channelings, and periodic retreats / Homecoming gatherings. Multiple formats (text, audio, events) create layered return touchpoints.

11. Positioning vs. “Competition”

Positioning leans on being the primary/original source repository (“Home of the Law of One”), archival authenticity, and non‑commercial accessibility (free PDFs). This differentiates the organization from later secondary teachers who create paid interpretations.

12. Potential Benefits for Participants

Open resources (free books, transcripts), long historical archives, and global meet‑ups support self‑paced, low‑cost study. Multilingual initiatives (invitations to translation) foster inclusivity and volunteer collaboration.

13. Due Diligence / Audit Questions

  1. Financial Transparency: Are annual reports, fund allocation details, reserve levels publicly accessible?
  2. Content Update Cadence: How frequently are podcasts and new transcripts released relative to community expectations (any concerns about stagnation)?
  3. Critical Discourse: How does the organization moderate or encourage critical examination versus passive acceptance?
  4. Quality Criteria: What editorial standards govern new channelings and revised editions?
  5. Usage Metrics: Are aggregate metrics (downloads, event attendance) published to demonstrate reach and stewardship of donations?

14. Concise Summary

L/L Research operates more as an archive‑driven non‑profit platform than a “person‑centric” sales system: open resources, free PDFs, transcripts, and community events are central; monetization is moderate (donations, book/merch sales) without pronounced pricing escalation or time‑pressure rhetoric. The channeling epistemology can still encourage some users to accept material with limited falsifiability, and community members sometimes raise questions about the pace of new content and resource stewardship. Overall, the model emphasizes accessibility and archival preservation over intensive commercial upselling.

Well… and this is simply fine. This is honest work. Consistent with the positive path.

2 Likes
7

Going through your post it seems like Aaron Abke’s courses are more of a money making scheme than anything. I don’t fault anyone for creating a business and making money but it seems like the real intention/focus is the money rather than trying to broaden peoples perspectives in trying to understand themselves. Its also a bit sad seeing this because people can get a wrong impression about the original source material provided by LL Research and be turned off by it. I guess thats part of the challenges of seeking. Leaving it on a positive I want to say L/L research has been a great caretaker to their channeled works and the teaching of the confederation.

3 Likes
8

There are various possibilities regarding what we’re really dealing with. It could be a consortium or some kind of connection to a deeper authority that provides orders and money for these kinds of things. They find the right people, give them instructions, and provide funds to launch and promote their work. In return for the startup money and the opportunity to earn more independently, these individuals follow the directives, which usually involve controlled disinformation. The goal is to capture people’s attention and keep them in a situation where they receive something that feels valuable enough to stay engaged. At the same time, they are fed misinformation that wastes their time and drains their resources. This creates a kind of loop. On one side, there’s something truly interesting that catches your curiosity. On the other, it ends up being a waste of time or even something that holds you back in your growth. It’s very deceptive.

Another reason behind such business operations might be to divert people away from a truthful source. By referencing the Law of One and making content about it, such as that YouTube series on the Law of One from Ra through Abke, people might get interested in the new project, thinking it’s from someone within the same soul community. Once they shift their focus to this new content, they often forget the original source of the Law of One. They feel like they’re still in the same stream of knowledge and that they’re still receiving legitimate teachings, when in fact it’s no longer the same thing. Often there’s also a narrative saying the original source has already lost its value, while this new group claims to be the rightful continuation of the teachings. I’m not saying Abke specifically did this, but this kind of shift does happen.

Another possibility is that people like Abke and his team are truly devoted to working in the spirit of Service to Others. But the reality is that it’s incredibly difficult to make a living doing what you love and staying true to your purpose without using some form of persuasion or manipulation. People don’t just come to you on their own. You have to get them to want to listen to you, watch you, and pay you. In this situation, people often give in to temptation more and more, especially once they realize how easy it is to make money from others. Eventually, this draws in various negative influences and creates distortions within themselves, which makes it very hard to stay on the STO path.

There are certainly other reasons why these types of businesses emerge. People can have many different intentions and goals that we might never even imagine. Maybe someone is actually a good person who resorts to manipulation because they’re trying to save a sick friend whose treatment is outrageously expensive. Or maybe someone experiences being popular and performing in front of others as a high that feels as intense as sexual pleasure, and it is only for these feelings that he does what he does. Situations vary so much that we shouldn’t judge anyone in advance. But when we notice something isn’t right, it’s good to just quietly go our own way without anger and let others walk their path as well.

From what I’ve noticed, the best things I’ve received in life have actually come to me entirely for free, including the material from L/L Research. That’s something worth holding on to. Anyone who truly has something to offer understands their responsibility toward others and is willing to share it without charging for it. The exception might be when someone performs a specific kind of service, like a therapist, who has to spend a great deal of time in direct contact with people, giving them individual attention over many hours. He (or she) has no other options or time to earn money and is forced to take the money because it consumes him completely, and he can’t do anything about it. Because he doesn’t really have appropriate skills, because he has no other realistic options to separate earning money from selflessly helping others. Such cases happen, and it’s understandable that someone would want to earn money on helping others in such a situation.

In general, we have to be cautious about what’s being published. Unfortunately, we live in a time where people who are not polarized or who tend toward negative polarization are doing quite well, making money and building their image. Meanwhile, those who lean toward positive polarization are often excluded, ignored, or pushed aside because they won’t break their own moral boundaries, even if they have a lot of valuable and uplifting insights and knowledge to share. Their interior is unknown to outside and they are only exposed to projections that come from these negative types who “purify” themselves.

However, I believe that their opportunity will come as well. Just a little more patience. In this world, on this planet, within our lifetime, those who remain unpolarized will face social collapse and may not even survive physically. Those who carry the genuine potential for either negative or positive polarization will have a chance to prove themselves. I truly feel this very deeply.

Just as right now those who polarize negatively and those who don’t polarize at all are leading, while the positive ones are falling behind. Soon it might be the different. Those who remain unpolarized could fall behind, and those who polarize, whether negatively or positively, will come to the forefront. This is still good news, even with the presence of negativity and negative polarization. After all, without negativity there would be no positivity; everything would simply be one. I believe positivity and the true and honest spirit of humanity will be reborn.

And the days will return when decent people can do something selflessly for others and be noticed. Maybe there won’t be any money then, and no one will truly have anything (well, not literally anything), but at least true spirit will remain, and everyone will always have something to survive and feel good about as part of a community and as someone whose basic needs are met. Without the online fight for attention and clowning around…

3 Likes
9

I used this too and it worked.

1 Like