Raz,
OK, to me, I would ask, if someone is this nervous about disagreement, what happened in their childhood. “Distortions” that are troublesome can either come from childhood or biological problems like illness in my understanding.
Perhaps I am the one that is disproportionately comfortable with conflict. But, where I would look if I were to try and find what was up with someone, especially male, that was disproportionately afraid of conflict (You don’t know this person). I would ask, “did they grow up with a single mother?”, since single mothers often phrase conflict in a way, not like men do. For men conflict is “These are the rules did you break them?” and they have the backup of just glaring at people to keep them in line because we are afraid of men on a primal level. Women, without the backup of male physiology often keep their kids in line via “If you argue with me I will be neurotic and upset”. Leading to “You have to be super careful about my feelings which are as fickle as the wind”. I.e. walking on eggshells. So the child grows up with a deathly aversion to conflict. Especially if violence is a part of this.
This is the globalist agenda. This is why they get the father out of the house in every country they are in control.
It could also be a cowardly father. But these things are just a guess. This is the kind of ‘work’ that the Law of One talked about.
If you have something to say to me about something I have said then it seems productive to simply say that. It is unlikely that someone like me will be overly offended and afraid. In general, it seems to me the challenging and discussion of ideas should be pretty direct. It should be a knashing of teeth in some cases. Because ideas and debate are important, societies live and die on ideas, when bad ideas take hold literal genocides follow, and it is not a daycare.
Tree of Human Needs.
What you are talking about sounds very mildly like Gestalt therapy. Gestalt therapy is a modality that basically states that in therapy, when a person has an unmet emotional need all their perceptive filters change to meet that need. So they look for the meeting of that need in all circumstances. There are many therapy modalities that are interesting and a lot of people that seem to know what they are talking about, including potential eluding to it in my dreams, is parts therapy. But I kind of like Gestalt. I think it makes a lot of sense.
HOWEVER, I have noticed that the sixth density entities don’t really connect a great deal to outer philosophies. They don’t consume them like fifth density entities do and they tend to want to be the originator of their own ideas. The Law of One contact was the producer of such wisdom, perhaps it is some part of their energy.
I do not know what density you are that is just an observation.
I though, am fifth density, (probably Latwii, since that was obviously the fifth density entity involved in the Law of One trio and I seem to resonate along similar lines) and I tend to be quite content accepting and working on already established theories.
There is another set of theories that I think is unbelievably powerful called the human design system. To me, it is the second half of the Law of One. The Law of One comes in and states that the priority is to study archetypes and lays down some foundational laws and perspectives, the human design then comes in with a superior mechanism for studying said archetypes.
The Human Design system has too much information to summarise. But it not only establishes what needs someone is likely to have, and tendencies. But how likely that one specific person is likely to gravitate towards a specific need. The system is unbelievably complex so I won’t explain it any further, but I just wanted to summarise what my understanding of ‘The path’ is. So to speak.
Not sure if that picture uploaded but you can find it if you search google.
