Now, I know this idea has met controversy by a few others. I practice the law of one that i’ve spoken to but I believe that the negative opinions and the quick to react with a lack of supporting ideas
Is the reaction based off of the the negative opinions and bias opinions of what people believe are considered religions? And how they assume that some of the religions have been manipulated, and are manipulating and to call the law of one of religion is to somehow take away from it. But to get it reserved as a religion? Yes, a protected mind state is to make it illegal to erase the law of one from human history. This in my eyes would be the literal definition of saving this spirituality, which would make the people who register it massize of the law of 1 the second definition. One who saved the spirituality. So now that i’m in the correct place to voice, this idea, are there any ideas are arguments supported by facts or genuinely coherent opinions on why we shouldn’t get it on a list of which belief do you believe in?? It’s simple, really? You need an address for your temple. It doesn’t need to be a temple. It could be an address, a simple address. You need 3 signers in my country. Canada and you need to be Ah, in some kind of service, question answer service would be enough to describe the services that the law of one is offering, and you need to be a nonprofit organization. This will be give you the ability to receive and dispense monetary goods without taxation. As all religions are.
May the light and love of the divine creator be with us.
I understand your perspective and have reflected on similar thoughts. What guided me to this understanding was not the veneration of an entity through prescribed rules and rituals, nor through designated churches or sacred places. Rather, I recognized that everything and everywhere is an expression of the divine creator. Even Ra acknowledged the challenges faced here, as humans tend to create false gods and worship them. Perhaps more concerning is the part within ourselves that desires to be worshipped.
My point is that attempting to align the Law of One with familiar religious frameworks might lead to misunderstanding. Conversely, such comparisons might be precisely what enables others to discover that everything manifests as an expression of the creator. This eternal cycle of learning, returning to the source, and expanding again to experience different perspectives, transcends our current understanding.
The Law of One will never disappear. It exists beyond this density, this planet, and any organizational structure that might document it. Perhaps there is no need to explain our beliefs to others or categorize them under a specific name. What truly matters, I believe, is what resides within us.
I do not intend to discourage your chosen path. My suggestion is simply that the more meaningful approach may be to look inward, honor what resonates with us personally, and help others find their way by sharing the fundamental truth: we are one, and everything is interconnected as part of the same whole.